Please explore selected examples of our evaluation and research projects
examining math learning and achievement below.
Not exact matches
In a recent study, Lynch and summer
learning expert James S. Kim, an associate professor at HGSE,
examined the effects of a summer
math intervention in which students were given access to an online
math program and asked to do three «playlists,» or worksheets, a week.
This meta - analysis
examines the impacts of technology on K - 12
math learning and finds it can have generally positive effects for technology integration.
We'll
examine how
learning trajectories can be used to monitor and support mathematical growth during engagement in rich, vibrant
math workshops in contrast to the use of textbooks, and how technology can be a powerful tool in providing differentiation and professional support.
The only answer that makes sense to us is for a state to make sure that its
math and reading standards are clear, coherent, and rigorous; that its tests line up with those standards; that its schools and educators are held to account for getting better results in terms of real student
learning; and that research is done to
examine the effectiveness of various curricular products.
And a still - newer 2015 CREDO analysis,
examining charter schools in 41 urban communities, found them, on average, achieving 40 additional days of
learning growth in
math and 28 days in reading compared to matched peers in district schools.
Located in the screening section of the website, FASTreading and FASTmath were specifically designed to be used in conjunction with the Screening to Intervention ™ (s2i) reports for reading and
math, because they allow teachers to
examine each student's individual
learning.
A recent study
examined how much of the achievement gap in
math between rich and poor 15 - year - old students can be attributed to what material the kids are
learning in school, and it found, across 33 countries, that schools are teaching rich kids vastly different
math content than poor kids.
We were interested in
examining whether the evidence teachers focused on was linked to the lesson
learning goal (s) as well as in the level of specificity of the evidence in relation to (a) mathematic content understandings and / or difficulties, (b) engagement in
math practices included in the curriculum standards, and (c) use of mathematics academic language.
Emphasis was placed on the current science landscape and how it supports and overlaps student
learning in
math, ELA, and social studies by
examining the skills of engaging in argument from evidence and supporting student discourse in the classroom in each of these content areas.
SRI is conducting a multi-year study that
examines whether and how an elementary digital
math curriculum can improve student
learning.
In the other schools, the process led teachers away from
math and toward
examining other barriers to student
learning.
The present study
examined whether indicators of
math learning disability are observed in 5 - and 6 - year - olds with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and in 5 - to 6 - year - old girls with Turner syndrome or
He also has one of the world's most
examined brains, having been the subject of leading neuroscientists in the U.S. and the U.K.. Here, he explains what science has
learned about him and about the brain in general, and he explains the techniques he uses to master language,
math, and memorization.
OBJECTIVE: To
examine how gradients in socioeconomic status (SES) impact US children's reading and
math ability at kindergarten entry and determine the contributions of family background, health, home
learning, parenting, and early education factors to those gradients.
This study uses nationally representative data from the US Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS - B) to
examine the magnitude of SES gradients in reading and
math ability at kindergarten entry and the independent contribution of factors in the family background, health, home
learning, parenting, and early education domains to these gradients.