Sentences with phrase «example do evil»

You said, «Omnipotence does nt mean the ability to do things that are logically impossible (God cant for example do evil)» So when god created everything, it didn't also create evil?

==================== @LinCA «You said, «Omnipotence does nt mean the ability to do things that are logically impossible (God cant for example do evil)» So when god created everything, it didn't also create evil?

Omnipotence does nt mean the ability to do things that are logically impossible (God cant for example do evil)

Not exact matches

Same thing IMHO with Google's unofficial «Do No Evil» motto — a perfect example of the law of inverse relevance: the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about iDo No Evil» motto — a perfect example of the law of inverse relevance: the less you intend to do about something, the more you have to keep talking about ido about something, the more you have to keep talking about it.

«Let no pleasure tempt thee, no profit allure thee, no ambition corrupt thee, no example sway thee, no persuasion move thee, to do any thing which thou knowest to be evil; so shalt thou always live jollily; for a good conscience is a continual Christmas.»

Or do you want to make an example of me, as the «evil Christian» with Sabio (much more Jesus - like) hovering over to make sure you hit the right note of bitterness?

sorry I did not realize I was on a Jewish site, I have been told, within your faith you believe in god but not the devil, I will try to explain god needed a play mate, to make up the opposite as we know, example, day un night, right and left, up and down, good and evil

Here is just one quote from the book that is an example: «evil and darkness can only be understood in relation to Light and Good; they do not have any actual existence».

No where in this article do you mention «how» you can tell if a person is being possessed by evil you just give examples from stories you've read and do you know why??

Gustav Aulen's contention, for example, that the New Testament teaching on Christ's death is teaching simply about his conquest of the devil — the «classic motif» falls into this category as does Karl Barth's understanding of evil conveyed in his term das Nichtige or Karl Rahner's «supernatural existential.»

For example, 2 Corinthians 5:10 says that we will all appear before the judgment seat of Christ to give an answer for the things done in the body, whether good or evil.

I'm sure many people would consider themselves pacifists but say that this is too extreme a definition, one might say for example that pacifism means «attempting to promote peace and making it a goal, but accepting that war is necessary in some cases to prevent greater evils,» however the way violence vs. following Jesus is being discussed in this context doesn't allow such concessions.

The Christian extreme bias that a person is evil simply because they don't think Jesus was any more than a good example of how humanity should treat each other, is a position non-believers know too well.

In discussing the classical free will theist's position, Griffin, for example, asks why a God who can occasionally coerce does not «do so occasionally, in order to prevent particularly horrendous evils?»

If all these examples don't convince you I don't know what will, I mean I have given you solid, 100 % proof and if you still disbelieve than you are just a puppet of satan and I have every right to refuse to listen to your evil lies!

If the declarations of God found in a book override your innate sense of morality, isn't that an example of otherwise good people doing evil because of religion?

To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....

If one would want to indict God for doing evil, à la Job or Ivan Karamazov, then a deistic God, for example, would have only one crime to answer for: creation itself.

If, for example, evil has been defeated from the very outset, and human history has already been secured by God in election, does this not render history a mere process by which God can effect the inevitable triumph of his grace, with human beings little more than the passive beneficiaries of his boundless and irresistible good will and grace?

Christianity is all about reversing the evil done in our «freedom to choose», and about extracting supreme good even from supreme evil, the quintessential example of which is the Crucifixion of God the Son on the Cross and the resultant victory over death in the Resurrection.

This is a perfect example of what we have been arguing in this book, that God takes the blame for that which He did not prevent, that God bears responsibility for evil things that occur on His watch.

Is it equally legitimate for Catholic apologists for legal abortion, and even its facilitation by public funding, to appeal to Aquinas» teaching about the toleration of evil, as Mario Cuomo, for example, has done?

Despite all the evil in the world, the evil for example of worshipping economic growth instead of God, God does not condemn.

So your example does nothing to support the evil kinds of judgment and weird ways of things later in the NT (i.e., from Paul) if that's what you were trying to prove here.

Obviously there are many, many Christian sects that do not preach that gays are evil, etc — look at the United Church, for example.

For example, Hobbesian parents tend to think that a child's nature is unruly, undisciplined, and selfish — not in an evil sort of way, more of a benign «they don't know any better.»

Ash vs The Evil Dead is the perfect example of how to bring life back into an old series, it takes all the elements from the past films, the gore, blood, violence, campy humour, cheesy dialog and absurdity and really does a great job modernising the franchise while sticking true to its past.

It certainly can be done — one example that comes to mind is Fede Alvarez» EVIL DEAD reboot, which was bloody fantastic.

Although its no surprise the mysteries of the universe are not unraveled here, The Shaggy D.A. does offer some silly fun, a positive family example, the opportunity for good to triumph over evil, and an underdog worth rooting for.

Consider, for example, a different strategy: One that says «We're not just going to say «Don't Be Evil» — we're actually going to Do Good.»

At its heart, Pokemon is a great example if «If it ain't broke, don't fix it» — collect eight badges and stop the evil team.

However, I personally don't think it's the finest example of the series ethos, it certainly has all of the qualities that make a great Resident Evil game but it just falls short when compared to the finest outing for the series.

Even if it was over hyped and despite being a good game it's core game we get day 1 is a 8/10 for EXAMPLE review sites wouldn't dare be honest, they'd give it a 9, 9.5 or 10/10 Did the same with GTA4, Final Fantasy 13, Resident Evil 5, Halo 4, Assassins Creed 3 etc..

I'm not saying reviews don't matter at all though, but how many people follow a project that interests them like Journey, XCOM or next year's Tomb Raider right from its inception to release and not buy it because of reviews, perhaps Journey & XCOM are bad examples because they're pretty much the only contenders for GotY2012, maybe Resident Evil 6 & NfS: The Run instead, where both titles received nothing but middling reviews but sold very well.

Do nt know why there is some bad Transformers game in OCTOBER when there should be a game like The Evil Within for example, But RE1 is pretty good.

Resident Evil is truly is a timeless classic that every generation should enjoy, and a perfect example of how to do survival horror without decking players out with a full armoury.»

Resident Evil HD is a great example of a remastered classic done right.

The Evil Within 2 is a prime example of a sequel done right.

The Evil Within is the perfect example of the old cliche «If it ain't broke, don't fix it».

With no real previous example to refer to (we didn't uncover the fact that Resident Evil Revelations 2 had taken this approach until a week or two into the season), we were pretty much «making shit up» as we went.

While that is certainly a broad example of how a game like Resident Evil 4 showed the BioShock team what did - and didn't - work for their vision, the game's influence can also be felt in smaller ways.

Don't you find it a bit interesting he sarcastically refers to «Evil Oppression and bullying from the Konsensus Kops» toward Judy where presumably it means there is no such thing, that she is using that as a false example of what she has experienced because of her ability to reach tenure?

But to be certain, the «lessor evil to prevent a greater evil» example does not apply, in any way, to the simple immoral behavior as displayed by Mr. Rawls.

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

And even though Adams seems to tolerate on the same page the convenience of «and / or» as merely «one of the more benign drafting evils» (in appropriate circumstances where it does not result in ambiguity), he «tends to avoid using and / or» in his own drafting (he also provides more commentary, and examples, in his book A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting, 2d ed (Chicago: ABA Section of Business Law, 2008) at paras 10.56 to 10.60).

The Best of PS3 collection is by no means all - inclusive (for example, the Capcom collection doesn't include Resident Evil 6 or Devil May Cry 4), however, there are still plenty of games offered in the sale.