Were there any notable
examples of hoaxes we missed here?
WABBetaInfo, which spotted the feature, gave
an example of a hoax chain - mail message that prompts the warning:
Not exact matches
Might one or two
of these
examples be «
hoaxes»?
That means a
hoax warhead — where one variety
of uranium was swapped for another, for
example — won't pass the test.
And despite Zuckerberg's initial assertion that it's «extremely unlikely
hoaxes changed the outcome
of this election,» Facebook is taking more steps to fight the problem — by making it easier to report fake stories, for
example, and considering the addition
of warning labels to stories that readers have flagged as phony.
One
example of this is the «motivated rejection
of science»; if you are personally convinced that global warming is a
hoax, you are likely to reject any scientific information to the contrary — regardless
of its accuracy.
There is plenty
of evidence
of online shenanigans and tricksters, and recent
examples, such as the Manti Te'o fake - girlfriend
hoax, are littered across popular culture.
The New York Times Editorial Board, for
example, writes that «the bill is a cruel
hoax that would help the wealthiest Americans at the expense
of the poorest.»
If this is a
hoax it will be used to smear, demonize, and be held up as an
example of how low climate sceptics will stoop.
In the first presidential debate, though the moderator disappointingly failed to ask a question about was is arguably the single most critical issue facing human civilization today — human - caused climate change — the Democratic nominee for President, Hillary Clinton, forced the issue herself by calling out Donald Trump for his denial
of climate change, noting that he, for
example, in a past tweet dismissed climate change as a
hoax perpetrated by the Chinese (indeed Trump has posted at least a half - dozen climate change - denying tweets over the past few years).
I do admit, though, there are a lot
of your fellow luke - and non-warmers who apparently believe the world's scientists are engaged in some massive conspiracy to perpetrate a
hoax (see previous comment for
example).]
Dr. Gleick and his apologists are a classic
example of the lengths to which the global warming — now called climate change — conspirators have been willing to go to maintain the
hoax.
This whole «Greenhouse Effect» conjecture (It ceased being a hypothesis when it caused everything and everything was proof
of it) is the saddest
example of «post modern» science ever seen, what a complete and total
HOAX, it makes the Piltdown Man look respectable and peer reviewed......
President Donald Trump, for
example, has claimed global warming is a «
hoax,» and he has named well - known climate deniers to lead the Environmental Protection Agency and Department
of Energy, among other posts.
For
example, 67 percent
of respondents, including 48 percent
of Republicans and 72 percent
of independents, said they were less likely to vote for a candidate who said that human - caused climate change is a
hoax.