Not exact matches
Take for
example Michael Hebb, the founder of Death over Dinner, a nonprofit that brings together
people — over dinner — to reflect on the consequential event that happens to us all, but that no one likes to
talk about.
A mastermind is simply this: a gathering of similarly - minded
people (entrepreneurs, for
example,) who get together every once in a while and
talk about what's going on in businesses.
(Bloomberg, for
example, has long
talked up the idea of a «
people index.»)
Dao points to the hypothetical
example of a company that wants to improve customer service ratings, but which has an extensive automated phone tree before customers can
talk to an actual
person.
In a recent TED
talk, for
example, American health guru Ron Gutman, founder of the Wellsphere blog network and the HealthTap site, pointed to studies of old pictures — ranging from yearbook headshots to mugs on baseball cards — that found
people who smiled in youthful photos turned out to live better and longer lives than folks who didn't.
This point might seem semantic when we're
talking about resources that
people uniformly value — like money for
example.
Our products, for
example, help
people drive safely while
talking on mobile phones.
For
example, Reed says that if the employee in question recently «made complaints of racial or gender discrimination, yet the behavior or performance problem does exist, it's a good idea to
talk to an attorney about how you might approach that
person.»
Sometimes scientific findings of such head - slapping obviousness —
talking on the phone makes you a worse driver and men generally favor large breasts, for
example — that they make the average lay
person wonder how anyone ever got funding to investigate the question in the first place.
For
example, if a customer runs into an issue while depositing a check online, he or she might pick up the phone to
talk to a
person at the bank.
He previously tried to
talk to his 13 - year - old daughter about data privacy and social media — even providing
examples of how much the tech companies know about
people and what they can do with that information.
It gives specific, practical
examples of
people and organizations that are doing the things discussed, and
talks about ways to adapt the techniques to a variety of situations.
For
example, a lot of
people try to get into content marketing because they hear a lot of successful marketers
talking about it.
And it just goes to show a lot of
people's edge, and in his case, I think, for
example, is that is his ability to stick to his system, you know, much like you
talk about in blackjack where he says, «Look, this is what I do and realize there's gonna be times of underperformance,» and not changing his whole approach when markets are down or he's doing poorly.
And so for
example, if you look at U.S. government debt, which is the one almost everyone always
talks about, most
people aren't sitting there worrying about how much debt does Amazon have, when you look at government debt, interest payments on government debt as a percent of GDP or as a percent of tax revenue, currently because interest rates are relatively low, are very low, are running half, literally half of what they were in the second half of the»80s and the first half of the»90s.
I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide
examples of lay
persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.
Dalahast; you said «I think Bostontola is making a point that both creationism and atheism provide
examples of lay
persons talking about a science they don't fully comprehend.»
In his Restoration Therapy model, he lays out four simple steps to help
people create change, and it is a great
example of self -
talk, which is the practice of speaking truth into your life.
Talk to a traffic policeman, for
example, for these are among the world's most disillusioned
people.
The pastor also
talked about (and gave
examples of)
people in need tithing and then having good things happening like a relative dying and leaving them some money.
Jolsteen, Graham and
persons like these, are the worst
example of the freedom to express yourself, but they can be bought, why would they
talk to a Cult if they think it is a Cult.
Athiests always
talk about religious intolerance as an
example of how terrible religions are, yet here they are, the biggest bunch of hateful
people attacking other
people's beliefs because they don't believe.
For
example, despite his insistence that what he does is different than what goes on in an Institutional Church, he still describes a group of
people who sit in chairs arranged in a square, sing some songs from a book, and
talk about spiritual things.
For
example, although Paul does use first -
person pronouns and the present tense, he did not use this sort of grammar in Romans 6, the first part of Romans 7, or on into Romans 8 where it is perfectly clear that Paul is
talking about regenerate
people.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded
people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for
example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was
talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for
example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
Except, Brenda, that
people do exactly what you suggest: they go in to a room,
talk to their god, and come out convinced absolutely and unequivocally that their god has commanded them to, for
example, fly hijacked jets into buildings.
Religion = Sentient power In the article's
example «When I
talk about God, I mean love and justice and reconciliation, not a man in the sky»; that
person still views these things as a sentient force.
After
talking about how the false teachers are bringing destruction upon themselves, Peter is going to give several
examples from biblical history about other groups of
people who were destroyed.
For
example, if these three parables are
talking about how Jesus goes out to find unsaved
people, and the lost sheep, coins, and sons therefore represent all the
people of the world, what is keeping us from a universalist interpretation of this passage, since Jesus doesn't stop searching until he has gathered all 100 back into his fold?
Beyond those
examples, of course, one can
talk about the way in which our present economic system negatively affects the lives of so many
people.
For
example, when someone is
talking about a death and tells you what the
person said before they died — That does imply it was said immediately before their passing.
So if Paul's concluding «Application» is that
people who were formerly at odds with one another (in an accusatory violent way) can now live at peace by following the
example of Jesus, it only makes sense that in the «Solution» section, Paul
talks about how Jesus brought the warring groups together and showed us how to live in peace.
The doctine of original sin is surely an aberration of what the bible really
talks about and could be said be an
example of «doctrine before
people»; I guess Augustine was a child of his times in that sense.
In any case, Austin is a prime
example of why Christians are hated by so many other
people — crazy hypocrites who can't think their way out of a wet paper bag yet who have no problem
talking endlessly about their imaginary gods who don't exist.
I've been
talking to a lot of
people about this and looking all around Central America for
examples of private investment in coffee farms.
Coffee and immigration
talks about the connection between the coffee crisis and
people abandoning their farms and heading for the U.S. border... another
example of how helping to improve living conditions in source countries (by paying a fair price for high - quality coffee) is beneficial in many ways.
Coffee and immigration
talks about the connection between the coffee crisis and
people abandoning their farms and heading for the U.S. border... another
example of how helping to improve living conditions...
My idea of a hero is a student / individual who: «cents Helps a
person with special needs «cents Takes time to
talk to the new kid «cents Asks someone how they are doing «cents Stands up for those who aren't strong enough to do so themselves «cents Makes sure others know that they care about them «cents Is a leader who sets an
example that treating others negatively is wrong «cents Isn't a follower when others are being treated unfairly
That is why, when
people talk about all time greats I have massively more respect for those players who did it the hard way — Maradona going to Napoli is a stand - out
example.
yep and @ozgunner and @rkw i do nt see why it angers and agitates you so much when i insult fans who abuse wenger, look i am not the kind of naive guy who thinks everybody should be nice to eachother of course that would be nice, but when i hate some opinions of some
people i do get annoyed a lot of times and i do show it and its truth i am not a supporter of the belief that one has to respect all opinions equally because i am firm believer that there are dump opinions for
example when a conservative
talks about homophob things i am pretty sure that i will insult him and some will say its wrong and will say its right its your opinion but back to your point..
For
example I remember
people talking about Bellerin last season saying he needs 2 seasons on loan before he'll be ready for the first team.
Some of the players
people talk about we simply can not reach, Cavani, for
example costs as much as our annual revenue: how could we make that deal?»
Arsenal Football Club is an
example of a successful business model and football club that
people will
talk about for years to come.
How do you expect
people (and I'm
talking about those who can not attend games, for
example) to express themselves?
If you see
examples of
people being bullied on TV or in books,
talk with your children about it.
For
example, Parent Match hosts a monthly Twitter chat where we bring together
people such as leading adoption attorneys or the heads of organizations like Help Us Adopt to
talk to adoptive parents quickly and easily online.
For
example, a teen who thinks, «I'm ugly and no one likes me,» is less likely to
talk to
people.
For
example, a child starting to want to spend the night at other
people's homes raises, no matter how much we don't want to
talk about it, the fact that your child could be subjected to inappropriate touching from the friend's family members, including and most commonly, from an older sibling of the friend.
For
example,
people talking about how much they hope I have a girl may be indicative of how much they enjoyed having a daughter of their own or wished they had.
For
example, you can try saying the following: «I don't like having to
talk to new
people either.