Sentences with phrase «examples of principled decision»

To non-Indigenous people it may not be apparent how a story contains laws, but further engagement can reveal complex interrelationships, precedents for problem solving, and examples of principled decision making.

Not exact matches

Obama went on to frame decisions as disparate as ending tax breaks for the wealthy and defending foreign aid as examples of biblical principles in action, quoting Jesus» teaching that «for unto whom much is given, much shall be required» and invoking the «biblical call to care for the least of these.»

In a nutshell, our claim in that du Pont and his colleagues reach counter-intuitive conclusions (for example that the EU has made a more «equitable» pledge than either China or India) by way of a cascading series of decisions that, taken together, skew their approach towards various kinds of grandfathering, while, at the same time, appearing to be derived from a balanced and comprehensive set of high - level equity principles.

The decision provides a useful summary of the principles upon which a Norwich Pharmacal order will be granted and is an example of how the courts will apply European and national law to claims involving electronic media.

For example, Madam Justice Deschamps wrote a concurring opinion in Alberta Teachers» Association on the view that judicial deference is based upon the principle of relative expertise or experience in a particular area, and thus a bare assertion of a presumption of deference simply because a statutory decision - maker is interpreting its home statute pays too little attention to whether the statutory decision - maker actually has sufficient expertise or experience to justify deference to its determination of a legal question (Alberta Teachers» Association at paras 82 — 89).

For example, it concedes, in principle, that some questions of bias or procedure might not be questions of general law of central importance to the legal system but rather questions of discretion, policy or interpretation of a decision - maker's home statute to which a deferential approach should be applied.

This means that online repositories of court and tribunal decisions can not be mined for personal information; however, personal information can be used without consent to further the open courts principle (for example, a reporter gathering information to use in a newspaper story).

But courts of appeal have a discretionary power to make exceptions to that principle, in particular when a change in the state of the law changes after the trial decision is delivered, for example due to a declaration of unconstitutionality issued in a separate case.

While the principles set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in Gordon v. Goertz are (and were intended only to be) a good general direction to look at in determining what is in the best interests of the child in considering a major change in residence, fortunately other Courts have given some additional specific examples of things that should be looked at in making this decision.

They also explore principles of fairness (for example, the problems with an «eye for an eye» or «first come, first served») and the issues and problems involved in appealing to consequences and duty when making moral decisions in everyday contexts.