He is helped enormously by three
excellent actors giving their all in the lead roles.
Not exact matches
The other characters are
given very little in terms of depth, but the
actors portraying them do an
excellent job in endearing themselves to the viewer.
Everyone knows about different acting methods and a lot of people knew about what Carrey did on the set of Man on the Moon but obviously we never saw it, but that's what this documentary is and although it's not spectacular or anything, it
gives another look at the work of the
actor and it becomes an
excellent companion to the film and especially serves as a testament of one of Jim Carrey's best acting jobs.
We are instead
given a number of impressive, but token flashy performances by veteran
actors in tough guy bit parts (Pete Postlethwaite and Chris Cooper as irredeemable lifelong criminals) and newcomers in «dramatic stretches» (The Hurt Locker's Jeremy Renner who is good (again) but not as great as the star - makers would have you believe, and most notably, Blake Lively,
excellent as a drug - addled neighborhood floozy).
Not the fault of the
actors but when you have the
excellent Danny Huston (30 Days of Night) playing an evil German officer then there is the potential to create a proper villain, a mad genius with grand plans for world domination during a time of great sorrow for the rest of the world, and instead his General Ludendorff is resorted to cracking open gas tablets that
give him Hulk - like strength for no real reason and never really pays off in any way; in one scene he locks a group of people in a room with a deadly nerve gas and then decides to snort on his magic capsule before cackling and running off - camera like Jack Nicholson's Joker.
The movie features that
excellent Japanese
actor Hiroyuki Sanada, who
gave a performance to treasure in Yoji Yamada's The Twilight Samurai (2002)-- but is wasted here in a minor, bad guy role.
It's not necessarily the
actors, bother Gyllenhaal and Heath Ledger
give excellent performances, it's that there's just a real lack of chemistry between the two.
Both young
actors give excellent performances, but earn plenty of assistance from the adult cast members (including Edward Norton, Bill Murray, Bruce Willis and Tilda Swinton).
With
excellent technical specs and two of the finest
actors in the business in the lead roles, American Gangster is not unlike Frank Lucas himself, a polished, professional effort that
gives the people what they want when they want it, without diluting the product.
The
actors in the movie are universally
excellent — pleasantly surprising is Gary Oldman
giving his best performance in years with Gordon's beefier role in this film — but the one that will be remembered is of course Heath Ledger's Joker.
Others in the cast, including such
excellent actors as Christopher Walken and John Turturro,
give surprisingly weak performances.
The topnotch cast, composed of a couple indie film stars and several
excellent Native American
actors (particularly Graham Greene and Gil Birmingham)
give stellar performances.
Yeah, I think that's the going «grade» that many are
giving this movie It was visually impressive and had some great
actors in it (Cumberbatch and Swinton were
excellent in it.
The screenplay is
excellent, and I also think all the other supporting
actors do wonders with what they're
given, most of all Barbara Hershey.
Both Kheda Gazieva as Aminat, Ramasan's still beautiful but exhausted - looking mother and Aslan Elbiev as the ambivalent, mysterious Isa, who was wounded in the conflict (the
actor really is missing some fingers which
gives the character's dexterity as a handyman an added prurient fascination) are
excellent, and the supporting cast of local neighbors, Austrian police officers, social workers and schoolchildren are perfectly cast too.
As a result, many of the
excellent actors are not
given the chance to show their talent (Whoopi Goldberg, Jared Leto, and Vanessa Redgrave are two examples).
The voice acting is nothing short of
excellent, with each
actor giving it their all.