Sentences with phrase «excellent climate science»

The recommendation that this approach be «whole government» (drawing on the government's excellent climate science skills) is wise, but one thing will become really clear quickly.

Not exact matches

Mike Hulme is the author of the excellent Why We Disagree About Climate Change, which was one of The Economist «s four science and technology books of the year in 2009.

«When it comes to climate change, for example, there are many excellent real science sources, but also many political or pseudo-science sources that sound convincing to some people.»

It is an excellent paper, whose science column and news reporting have accurately and carefully carried the story of global climate change.

There was an excellent talk by Emily Levine, Interpretive Supervisor at Muir Woods, about the health of redwoods and how the science and study of these beautiful trees is helping us learn about the effects of climate change and what it means for our collective future.

Here's an excellent example of how to write really well and thus communicate effectively to the public and others in authority the issues related with climate science denial and the few academics and scientists who choose the other team.

And I concur with Chris McGrath that between you and Weart, your «offerings» lay an excellent groundwork for understanding the science of climate change.

I had a bit of an «a-ha» moment reading this paper by the excellent Australian political scientist Clive Hamilton, in which he argues that a great many American conservatives have come to see climate science as a threat to their core ideological identity.

Following the all - too - familiar pattern, this deeply flawed paper was heavily promoted by special interests as somehow challenging the scientific consensus that humans are altering the climate (an excellent account is provided by science journalist Dan Vergano of USA Today here).

Eric Berger of the Houston Chronicle has weighed in with an excellent post on the letter, noting that none of the complainants are climate scientists; that NASA's position as an agency reflects the brunt of science pointing to a human - heated planet; and that the personal stances of high - profile NASA scientists, Hansen, for instance, are indeed likely to damage the agency's credibility in the eyes of a public divided on global warming.

ESR's advice to software hackers is excellent, but he apparently hasn't applied it to his own understanding of climate science:

I think it is excellent if top scientists from other fields make methodological contributions to climate science.

I would also refer you to the excellent ongoing discussion of climate science issues by a team of climate scientists at RealClimate (www.realclimate.org).

Addendum; Everything I see in climate alarmist science is, after 25 years when one would think after the hundreds of billions spent on climate research there would be huge benefits already appearing, is always sometime in the future as in the excellent «future will do this or that» examples just above.

Bjorn Lomborg has an excellent column today on the forthcoming (extensively leaked) IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on climate science.

The reality is that climate science has had excellent public and free access to data (and code) and the situation is improving all the time.

We have three excellent participants joining this discussion: Bart van den Hurk of KNMI in The Netherlands who is actively involved in the KNMI scenario's, Jason Evans from the University of Newcastle, Australia, who is coordinator of Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and Roger Pielke Sr. who through his research articles and his weblog Climate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modClimate Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and Roger Pielke Sr. who through his research articles and his weblog Climate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modClimate Science is well known for his outspoken views on climate modclimate modelling.

Given we are starting a whole new year of bringing the science to people who have doubts about the veracity of some claims in climate science, this seemed like a good opportunity to run this excellent...

Here are three great videos debunking contrarians with excellent historical overviews of the science by Dr. Naomi Oreskes: «The American Denial of Global Warming», «Merchants Of Doubt», and «Answering Climate Change Skeptics».

BTW, Schneiders book (co-authored with Randi Londer) is an excellent addition to any library on climate science.

An excellent and necessary summary of the science — the hard science as opposed to the political «science» — pertinent to global climate change.

Roger Pielke Jr also has an excellent post, aptly titled Fixing the Marcott Mess in Climate Science.

A new book, Climate Change: the Science of Global Warming and Our Energy Future, serves as an excellent, long - needed primer on the workings of earth's cClimate Change: the Science of Global Warming and Our Energy Future, serves as an excellent, long - needed primer on the workings of earth's climateclimate.

Excellent new post at ClimateAudit by the indefatigable Jean S, on the «Black Tuesday of Climate Science» — it is harder than ever to believe that Michael Mann can win his defamation lawsuit against Steyn and others.

Congratulations on what looks like (on a very quick reading) an excellent contribution to climate science.

That's the premise of this excellent introduction to the science behind understanding climate change.

Thanks for all you do for climate science and for excellent posts here and the Guardian.

ABC in Australia has aired an excellent summary of links between extreme weather and climate science research and study.

With that in mind, I note that Matt @ 9 makes an excellent point in noting that Howard draws «no meaningful distinction between climate activism and climate science.»

Seems like an excellent idea in climate science as well.

I am only a humble member of the public, but I have a brain, an excellent earth science education, 28 years professional experience in the earth sciences and I have read a lot of relevant climate science papers, including MBH98 / 99 and others that followed; rebuttals by MM; Steig09 and rebuttal by O'Donnell etc and many, many others.

The excellent science and statistics blogger Tim Lambert has proposed a game called» global warming skeptic bingo,» in which all of the various discredited arguments that are repeatedly used to undermine the consensus view of human - caused climate change are arranged in a series of squares.

While the United States continues the ridiculous debate on the science of climate change (see «Climategate» scandal, which is a result of hacked e-mails from a British research institute, but seems to be getting most play in the United States; but see also this excellent response by the U.S. scientific community organized by a colleague), little such doubt lingers in China, a country governed by technocrats with degrees in engineering and science.

There have been some excellent examples of science communication to the general public recently: the superbly executed Years of Living Dangerously documentary series; Neil deGrasse Tyson's excellent Cosmos shows; and the very clearly written and beautifully laid out Third National Climate Assessment prepared by American scientists with the help of communications specialists.

Unfortunately, as Blair King writes «it actually represents a quite excellent example of how science is misrepresented to the public in the climate change debate.»

IMHO it's an excellent summary of the likely consequences of the USA's withdrawal from the Paris agreement; and good work by NBC News in presenting climate science to a mass - meeja audience.

Governments fearful of climate change action have abused their powers of IPCC editing and review, as Stephen Schneider describes in his excellent book Science as a Contact Sport.

The two of us just got back from the excellent «Open Science Conference «organised by the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) in Denver Colorado.

Jeremy Thanks for an excellent synopsis of the disinformation and misrepresentation of climate science in Joanne Nova's Skeptics handbook.

This book chapter gives an excellent overview of the scientific methods, and how climate science stacks up against it.]

An excellent analog of Galileo's science to climate science is that right - wing attacks on climate science are acting quite similarly to the inquisition attacks on Galileo.