This rally has not enticed the public to spend more and in fact, retail sales are off 6 % and still falling, thus, no recovery
except in the minds of Wall Street and Washington.
Today they are secular crimes not sinful disobedience
except in the minds of the deluded since the Bible is ABSOLUTELY SILENT on the matter.
So the rejection does not cast doubt on the Gospel, it affirms it,
except in the minds of the lost.
However, faith does not guarantee that a «god» exists,
except in the minds of believers.
There is no rule that prohibits
this except in the minds of the scholars and academics of the Church.
There is no question of the form pre-existing «in the abstract» for St Thomas -
except in the Mind of God from all eternity.
The above is a lie We all know god does not exist,
except in the minds of fools And note, I am happy in a loving relationship for many years now, seems your god does not want to hurt me?
Come on imaginary idiot belief, show us you don't truly exist
except in the minds of idiots.
What has been for thousands of years with the Catholic Church is still the same today... Truth does not change
except in the minds of those deceived by the evil one.
Except in the minds of Paterno's most ardent supporters, it will not fully restore the coach's reputation.
This time period is, of course, unknown, since such a pairing of species never occurred,
except in the minds of certain religious folks and cartoons.
Adding a modifier in front of the breed name is not correct, as there is no such thing as a miniature or teacup Chihuahua, and smaller dogs of the breed are not any different or more valuable than the larger examples
except in the mind of some buyers.
Nor has glacier melt been tied directly to GW
except in the minds of the catastophists.
But there's also a potential synergy: sodium - air batteries / fuel cells (there's not a sharp dividing line,
except in the minds of researchers) could easily «breath» air in but essentially pure O2 out.
This is no scandal
except in the minds of the scandalous, who, I imagine, go looking for it either because they're bored with their lives or have some other interest.
Christian does not necessarily equal Creationist —
except in the minds of those who oppose anyone holding any belief they don't like.
There's no doubt,
except in the minds of you and those who are foolish enough to pay attention to your ignorant ramblings.
The black swan had no problem with its exisetnece
except in the minds of the finest academics of the day.
Apple was never likely to buy Nest
except in the minds of tech journalists.
Not exact matches
I hope you're managing to stay cool —
except those
of you
in SF; never
mind ya'll; — RRB -.
For how much longer can the reality
of an acknowledged shortage for physical gold and silver go on
in the face
of an unprecedented and growing supply
of worthless fiat, where the former have a historic intrinsic value and the latter has no value, whatsoever,
except in the mindless
minds of the users?
There is no such thing as a «liberal» Christian, it does not exist,
except in the vanity
of their
minds.
What boggles my
mind is that people debate / discuss something (god) that has never been proven to exist
except in the one that believes
mind... once that person is dead their god ceases to exist since it has nowhere else to exist regardless
of what they would like to wish... they will soon be worm food...
... switch from using a mac to using a pc and expect the same thing... or go back to religion and get the same shunning from the atheists that you got from whatever church that was that you blindly followed... now you get to be the poster child for atheists the same way a repentant drugged up rock star gets to be the poster child for church...
except from the atheists» arrogant point
of view, you went from uneducated, ignorant, bigoted, intolerant and stupid to being sophisticated, intellectual, open
minded and free thinking...
in their opinion you were formerly a stupid a s s...
This is not an indictment
of any particular business person
except insofar as that person tends to embrace
in some manner the view
of humanity that Dawson associates with the bourgeois
mind.
I won't say much about that today,
except to mention that it's worth keeping
in mind that these words were spoken
in an intimate setting among Jesus» closest disciples, so we should be careful
of interpreting them as applicable only to those who believe differently than we do.
There is not a trace
of any succession; there is no temporal sequence at all —
except on the psychological level,
in the
mind of a student groping for the conclusion, not
in the logical structure itself.
Like Matthew, Luke says «lost its taste» instead
of Mark's «lost its saltness,» suggesting that the ordinary use
of salt for seasoning is
in mind; but instead
of Matthew's «It is no longer good for anything
except to be thrown out and trodden under foot» Luke has «It is fit neither for the land nor for the dunghill; men throw it away.»
Unlike the Christian god that wouldn't ever change his
mind or doctrine...
except for cursing the world for eating an apple...
except for telling Abraham to sacrifice his son, but then stopping him... and
except for killing nearly all life on Earth and then because
of the guilt says I'll never to do that ever again -
in exactly that way... and except for deciding that 2 of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and except for forgiving all sin, when «In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for.
in exactly that way... and
except for deciding that 2
of himself (Father and Spirit) weren't enough any more, and creating / fathering / spiriting as Son... and
except for forgiving all sin, when «
In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host of others... and except for... and except for.
In the beginning» he had cursed the universe for the eating
of an apple, by having his creation torture and kill his only begotten Son... and
except for having to repeat himself about the unchanging eternal rules, to Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Saul / Paul, Mohammed, Joseph Smith, Bahá «u «lláh, David Koresh, and a whole host
of others... and
except for... and
except for...
Working with Colin McGinn's ideas on consciousness Charlton illustrates the inconsistencies
of philosophers who view
mind as explainable by science, while suggesting himself that «the presence
of mind in nature is not something invisible and hidden
except to introspection, but the most palpable thing there is.
I can't add much to this flood
of advice
except to submit, with humility, that
in my view we don't have much choice about our fundamental emotional attitude; it is a matter
of personal character (body chemistry and the close culture
of family and schooling), but this need not affect our choice
of creed and code if we have independence
of mind.
Yes every body is hallucinating
except for Marx, Lenin and so on... But any body says God is hallucinating... only God rejectors and disbelievers are the one's are
in full presence
of mind and
in control...!?!
I am perfectly comfortable taking my chances that what I believe is right and true, so there is no «danger» at all,
except in your
mind (perhaps because I'm not validating you by agreeing to your version
of God?)
Because the exaltation
of Jesus to be the Lord
of men is a conviction which can be apprehended only by faith, it is hard to see how such a conviction could have grown
in their
minds except in the same way as similar convictions about God had always emerged
in the past.
Also, bear
in mind King Josiah's reforms to the hebrew bible not to mention the convenient «discovery»
of one
of the lost books
of Moses during his reign, ie Deuteronomy (which most scholars agree was not written
in the time
of «Moses»... provided Moses even existed... no evidence he or any
of the Patriachs ever existed...
except David) when you start to look at the evidence and history
of judaism and christianity it becomes quite clear that these religions are not what they claim to be.
The principal points Paul made
in that address are (1) to recall to their
minds the character and quality
of his ministry to them; (2) to remind them
of the trouble the Jews gave him and the anxiety and suffering he underwent
in their behalf; (3) to state that he preached repentance and faith
in Jesus Christ as the essence
of the gospel; (4) to testify that he went now to Jerusalem not knowing what would happen to him there
except that he knew by the Holy Spirit that afflictions awaited him; (5) to assure them that nothing concerned him, not even the loss
of life itself, so long as he could testify to the grace
of God
in Jesus Christ; (6) to say that he had no regrets about his ministry to the people
in Ephesus, for he was clean
of the blood
of all the people there, for he preached the full gospel to all
of them; and (7) to admonish them to be diligent
in their oversight
of the Ephesian church and to feed the church
of God there, which Christ purchased with his own blood.
The source
of the Bible's power to stir men's
minds and fire their imaginations is no secret,
except as all things human are ultimately clothed
in deepest mystery.
He will, like every man
of sound
mind and body
in the country (
except for the extremely religious), continue
in this way to fulfill his obligation as a member
of the reserve until he is fifty - four years old.
But
except for the specific details, many others have fought and lost to the same things — if not those things, then other things
of equal weight
in their heart and
mind.
If the nineteenth century presupposed the detailed historicity
of the Synoptic Gospels
except where «doctrinal tampering» was so obvious as to be inescapable (they had
in mind such things as «Paulinisms» and the miraculous), the twentieth century presupposes the kerygmatic nature
of the Gospels, and feels really confident
in asserting the historicity
of its details only where their origin can not be explained
in terms
of the life
of the Church.»
Also, I as an Atheist would tend to believe if evidence was
in fact provided... but your assertion that this would never happen is moot because the evidence you speak
of that would supposedly convince Atheists
of the existence
of god does not exist
except in your own
mind.
No one can know the
ins and outs
of your
mind except for God.
Such faiths
of singularisms bewailings are just what the preacher s do all hope and pray for,,, Singled
minds that is,,,, never to rise up
in unity
except when the preachers do beckon them!
Dr. J. A. Hadfield, one
of the most distinguished psychologists
of my generation,
in an essay on The
Mind and the Brain argues on a scientific basis «that in the course of evolution the mind shows an ever - increasing tendency to free itself from physical control and, breaking loose from its bonds, to assert its independence and live a life undetermined except by the laws of its own nature.&ra
Mind and the Brain argues on a scientific basis «that
in the course
of evolution the
mind shows an ever - increasing tendency to free itself from physical control and, breaking loose from its bonds, to assert its independence and live a life undetermined except by the laws of its own nature.&ra
mind shows an ever - increasing tendency to free itself from physical control and, breaking loose from its bonds, to assert its independence and live a life undetermined
except by the laws
of its own nature.»
Such faiths
of singularisms bewailings are just what the preacher s do all hope and pray fro,,, Singled
minds that is,,,, never to rise up
in unity
except when the preachers do beckon them!
The store
of memory, carried along out
of mind in ways that are the object
of active research, undoubtedly contributes most, by activation
of its components, to the unification,
except in the rare cases
in which two independent stores are built up, giving the basis for dominance at different times
of one or the other
of two personalities.
There was no reference to any role
of mind except in a paragraph immediately before the summary
in which I indicated both my philosophic position and what I considered the necessity for restriction to deterministic and probabilistic statements
in a scientific treatment.
The scholastic
mind of the middle ages called this materia prima and recognised that it can not exist
except in relation to a principle
of form - a principle
of organisation and identity.
When Whitehead quotes, he regularly uses the Authorized Version
except that
in one case (103) he seems to have the reading
of the English Revised Version
in mind.
He puts it this way: «the form
in the mode
of universality
in the
mind -LSB-...] has nothing to do, ontologically speaking, with the form as causa essendi,»
except for the fact that it is, must be for our knowledge to be true, the same identical form.