Among these practices have been illegal attempts to
exclude special education students.
This also
excludes Special Education students since they are specifically funded.
Not exact matches
We looked at differences among the states in terms of their placement rates into
special education — often one way to
exclude students from state tests — and at whether these differences were related to the introduction of state accountability systems.
I would submit that the teaching resources devoted to
students,
excluding teachers of
special education and limited - English speakers, is close to unchanged since 1970.
Students classified as learning disabled were excluded from the analysis, as they are eligible for a more generous voucher through the McKay Scholarship Program, and the FTC program should therefore have had no effect on schools» efforts to retain these students (see «The Case for Special Education Vouchers,» features, Winte
Students classified as learning disabled were
excluded from the analysis, as they are eligible for a more generous voucher through the McKay Scholarship Program, and the FTC program should therefore have had no effect on schools» efforts to retain these
students (see «The Case for Special Education Vouchers,» features, Winte
students (see «The Case for
Special Education Vouchers,» features, Winter 2010).
Before 1999,
special -
education students were
excluded from state accountability measures, but since then
special -
education students who are receiving instruction on grade level are also included.
In 2013, Maryland's scores were found to be inflated after it was determined that the state
excluded high percentages of
special education students from the reading exam.
Maryland's scores on a national reading test may have been inflated because the state's schools
excluded a higher percentage of
special -
education students than any other state, according to data from the U.S. Department of E
education students than any other state, according to data from the U.S. Department of
EducationEducation.
Maryland, which has allowed
special education students to use calculators on state tests for some time, previously had been
excluding special -
education students because of that rule.
While suspensions are sometimes necessary and appropriate, these policies are particularly troubling when they disproportionally
exclude students of color,
special education students or lower - SES
students.
The 9 percent of
excluded students were from the overall sample of
students tested in Austin, not from the smaller pool identified as being in
special education or English - language learners.
But as the National Assessment Governing Board, the U.S. Department of
Education division that oversees NAEP notes, states that
exclude more
special ed and ELL
students tend to have higher scores (and performance on NAEP) than those that
exclude lower numbers of kids.
Note: Table reports expenditures from all funds (General, State
Special Education, Combined GF &
Special Education, Total Governmental, Total State Grants, and Total Federal Grants); Statewide totals include expenditures from public charter schools Variable costs include expenditures for Instruction,
Student / Instruction Support Services, Other Support Services, and Fringe Benefits; They
exclude Operational Expenses, Total Property Expenses, Assets / Reserves, Debt Service, Transfers, and other miscellaneous expenses
Their approach is to reduce
special education staffing, add
special education to the work of regular classroom teachers, and
exclude high - needs
students from regular classrooms and schools.
Last year, Maryland led the nation in the percentage of
special -
education students it
excluded from the NAEP.
Special education students in grades K - 2, 9, 11 and 12 who aren't retesting are
excluded from this data.
The 9 percentage point spread (36 percent New York City district public schools vs. 45 percent charters) narrows to 7 (43 percent vs. 50 percent) when
special education students are
excluded.
ALEC bills also allow schools to loosen standards for teachers and administrators,
exclude students with physical disabilities and
special educational needs, eschew collective bargaining, and experiment with other pet causes like merit pay, single - sex
education, school uniforms, and political and religious indoctrination of
students.
(Wash.) A second study on enrollment trends in a major metropolitan area further absolves charter schools from complaints they systematically
exclude too many
special education students through admission or other academic policies.
Graduates are defined as those
students earning either a Local or Regents diploma and
exclude those earning either a
special education (IEP) diploma or GED.