Sentences with phrase «excludes damage caused by»

A traditional renters insurance policy excludes damage caused by earthquakes.

Covers damage caused by fire, windstorms, hail, lightning, and vandalism but typically excludes damage caused by flood or earthquake.

According to the adjuster, her policy excludes damage caused by machinery breakdown.

If you live in an area where floods may be a problem check whether your policy covers flood or excludes damage caused by flood;

Many all - risks insurance policies exclude damage caused by a contractor's faulty workmanship.

When Precision presented the claim, its insurer denied coverage arguing that the policy excluded damages caused by the release of pollutants.

However, many policies exclude damage caused by a utility service interruption, including resulting power surges.

While most homeowner's insurance policies exclude damages caused by aircraft, drones are technically considered «model or hobby aircraft,» and so they'd be covered.

Most homeowners insurance policies usually exclude damage caused by earthquakes and flooding.

Not exact matches

This suggests that the absence of DJ - 1 was unlikely to have strongly accelerated mtDNA damage caused by the Polg mutation, although we can not exclude a more subtle effect.

In particular we will not be liable for any damages that we cause unintentionally and we will not be liable to you for any actual, incidental, indirect or consequential loss or damage however caused, provided that nothing in this Agreement will be interpreted so as to limit or exclude any liability which may not be excluded or limited by law.

Note: Rust Damage and failure caused by rust is expressly excluded.

Under no circumstances will Carphone Warehouse (or its parent, subsidiaries and affiliated companies) be liable (unless such liability can not be lawfully excluded) for any losses, damages, costs or expenses arising from or in any way connected with any errors, defects, interruptions, malfunctions or delays in the Incentive Promotion and it excludes liability, to the fullest extent permitted by law for any loss or damage caused to participants arising out of these rewards.

But several dog breeds are excluded by insurers, meaning they will not cover the cost of injuries or damages caused by that dog.

«Industrial operations» are generally excluded, but it's possible that even if the fire itself isn't covered under the responsible party's policy — perhaps the fire was caused by an illegal methamphetamine lab, and the criminal acts exclusion applied — but your damage in a separate home or apartment from the smoke caused by the fire may still be covered under your own renters insurance policy.

Just like with the other cards, damage caused by illegal actions is excluded.

Some policies may exclude coverage for damage caused by wind or hail.

Believe it or not but damage caused by intentional acts — such as vandalism or a criminal act — or often excluded from coverage under a homeowner's insurance policy.

For instance, damage caused directly or indirectly by war is excluded, as is damage caused by an invasion or by an act of a foreign enemy.

Damage caused by an intentional criminal act is excluded, but the intent is to stop an insured from benefitting from a criminal act, not to penalize unintended victims.

Damage caused by personal liability or illegal activity are also specifically excluded.

Just like with the other cards, damage caused by illegal actions is excluded.

An «inherent bias» in scientific journals in favour of more calamitous predictions has excluded research showing that marine creatures are not damaged by ocean acidification, which is caused by the sea absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal recently confirmed in Acciona Infrastructure Canada Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Co. [1] that a Workmanship / Design Exclusion does not exclude the costs to remedy damage caused by defective workmanship.

The insurer relied upon the Alberta Court of Appeal decision in Ledcor Construction Ltd v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co. («Ledcor»), [5] which excluded from coverage the cost of replacing glass windows that suffered damage during the cleaning process caused by the faulty workmanship of a trade contractor on the basis that repairing the windows would be «making good faulty workmanship» since the damage was the direct result of the cleaning carried out by the trade contractor.

on B.C. Court Of Appeal Finds Costs To Remedy Damage Caused By Defective Workmanship Is Not Excluded By Workmanship / Design Exclusion

The clause also contained language that stated contact damages were limited to direct damages only, excluding losses caused in any way by acts, omissions or misrepresentations (but excluding «any fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation» committed in connection with the agreement).

Lawyers will also argue that even if policies exclude flood - related damage, the policies still cover wind - related damage — and that the losses were caused by high winds, as high as 140 mph, rather than water.

Plaintiffs argued that evidence of failure to use a seat belt should be excluded because that conduct could not have caused the accident, and a plaintiff should not be required to anticipate negligent conduct by the defendant; the Court rejected that argument based largely on the language of the proportionate responsibility statute, which focuses on the various parties» roles in causing «the personal injury» or the «harm for which recovery of damages is sought,» rather than simply the occurrence that led to the injury.

Also excluded is the damage to the windows being worked on at the time, which damage was directly caused by the cleaning activities that constituted the faulty workmanship.

This works to limit a defendant's liability so as only to cover damage caused by their action, excluding damage that would have occurred regardless of their action.

However, this was reversed by the Court of Appeal which held that s 2 (1) of R (D) A 1886 provided «a right to compensation for all heads of loss, including consequential loss, proximately caused by physical damage to property for which the trespassing rioter is liable at common law, save to the extent that they are excluded by the statute».

The waiver typically excludes coverage for damage caused by speeding or driving on unpaved roads.

They also exclude loss or damage to money or securities by any cause.

To reject your claim, your insurer has to prove that damage was caused by flood which is excluded under the policy.

In fact, many recreational vehicle polices exclude intentional loss or damage caused by those you have entrusted your property to.

The insurance policy will often exclude «wear and tear» and damage caused by the failure to maintain the home.

Commercial Insurance has an exclusion called the «Aircraft Exclusion» that excludes the coverage of liability for damages caused by aircraft.

The Alberta automobile policy excludes loss or damage «caused by the conversion, embezzlement, theft or secretion by any person in lawful possession of the automobile under a mortgage, conditional sale, lease or similar other written agreement.»

The plans benefits shall not cover any loss, destruction or damage to any electrical and / or electronic machine, apparatus, fixture or fitting (excluding fans and electrical wirings in dwellings) arising from or occasioned by overrunning, excessive pressure, short circuiting, arcing, self heating, or leakage of electricity, from whatever cause (lightning included)

If your insurance company hasn't broadly granted this sort of permission, your policy probably excludes loss or damage caused by tenants and / or occurring while they're occupying the premises — leaving you unexpectedly at risk of financial consequences if claims for damage by your tenants are denied.

What many find out too late is that home insurance policies specifically exclude coverage for damages caused by floods.

All homeowner's insurance policies exclude water damage caused by flood.

Most commercial property policies cover damage to covered property caused by any peril that isn't specifically excluded.

Water damage caused by a leak due to rust or a failed seal is most likely excluded.

Many homeowners policies cover damage caused by «just about anything,» unless specifically excluded.

«Industrial operations» are generally excluded, but it's possible that even if the fire itself isn't covered under the responsible party's policy — perhaps the fire was caused by an illegal methamphetamine lab, and the criminal acts exclusion applied — but your damage in a separate home or apartment from the smoke caused by the fire may still be covered under your own renters insurance policy.

Most commercial property policies cover damage caused by any peril that is not specifically excluded.

The coverage shall also exclude any accident loss damage and / or liability caused sustained or incurred whilst the insured vehicle is 4 towing a greater number of vehicles than is permitted by law.

It provides coverage for the property lost, damaged or destroyed by any cause, other than those specifically excluded in the policy, necessitating replacement or repair.