The students visit their Partnership School every Friday afternoon during term time,
excluding study leave during examination periods.
Not exact matches
Women who had a vaginal delivery (n = 142,592) or underwent a repeat cesarean delivery (n = 27,619) were
excluded,
leaving 38,484 women who had a primary cesarean delivery as the
study sample.
Research has been limited since the previous definition
excluded overweight patients,
leaving them out of
study populations.
Although the bill's supporters might argue long - term
studies would not be
excluded, the law's language would likely
leave the term «reproducibility» open to interpretation.
For NHANES 2005 - 2010, we started with 16089 nonpregnant adults and
excluded 826, 1733, 1358, 952, 265, and 327 individuals, respectively,
leaving a
study population of 10628.
For NHANES 1999 - 2004, we started with 13422 nonpregnant adults and
excluded the following numbers of participants for the same reasons described for the 1988 - 1994 data: 740, 1560, 931, 757, 352, and 296, respectively,
leaving 8786 participants for
study.
Four
studies were
excluded because assignment to treatment was not random, 16 — 19 one because it was an interim analysis of an ongoing
study, 20 and 11 because they involved children with depressive symptoms and not depressive disorder.21 — 31 This
left six randomised trials of cognitive behaviour therapy for depressive disorder in young people.32 — 37 Two of the trials were conducted by the same research group 32 34 but it was clear from the trial descriptions that they were based on different samples.
The children
excluded from the
study were more likely to be living with one parent only (41.5 % vs 21.2 %; df = 1, χ2 = 8.41; P < 0.01) and their parents» education levels were lower (χ2 = 6.74; df = 2, P < 0.05), i.e. there were relatively more parents with 9th - grade
leaving certificates (10.8 % vs 2.9 %; P < 0.05).
Methodological inclusion criteria are listed as column headings in Table I and
excluded studies are listed in the
left hand column with the reason for exclusion denoted by the position of «no» under the methodological inclusion criteria that the
study did not meet.