Sentences with phrase «exclusive breastfeeding seem»

Those extra two months of exclusive breastfeeding seem to make a significant difference regarding these health issues.

Exclusive breastfeeding seems to decrease the risk of infectious diseases in infancy.

Exclusive breastfeeding seems to really smooth out the transition to solid foods.»

Exclusive breastfeeding seemed to drop the odds of ROP by 75 percent compared to exclusive formula use.

Not exact matches

And do breastfeeding advocates, who mostly seem to have found breastfeeding so straightforward and simple that they are at a complete loss as to why other people find it difficult, really understand what it is like as a new mum — with an overwhelming instinct to calm and nurture their baby — to deny their baby food in the name of «exclusive breastfeeding».

Exclusive breastfeeding (meaning no solid food, formula, or water) for at least six months seems to offer the most protection.

In an effort to promote exclusive breastfeeding as the optimal way to feed babies, we seem to have forgotten that it's not always easy or even possible for some people to do it.

When given exclusively, breastfeeding reduces the risk of infectious diseases in infants in developing countries.21, 22 In industrialized countries, exclusive breastfeeding during the first 6 months seems to decrease the risk of gastrointestinal tract infections, compared with exclusive breastfeeding during only the first 3 to 4 months.23, 24 On the basis of these and other reports, the World Health Organization recommended in 2001 that all children be exclusively breastfeed for 6 months instead of 4 months.

Some of my academic friends in the UK seem to think that we should return to 4 months of exclusive breastfeeding...

«A lot of the protective effects we see in pregnancy [such as fewer relapses, which is also associated with exclusive breastfeeding] do seem to be hormonal — one theory suggests this may be mediated by changing levels of estriol during pregnancy and postpartum,» noted Lucassen, who was not involved in the study.

But, as often seems to happen, a reasonable idea morphed into the weird restrictive idea that bonding needs to take place under specific circumstances and at specific times or it will be fatally flawed (right after a natural childbirth, exclusive, extended breastfeeding, attachment parenting, etc.)-- and that so obviously is not the case.

Exclusive breastfeeding does not seem to have been understood or respected in recorded history, however — which goes back only for a few hundred years in most cases and for a few thousand years in a few.

Although some SIDS experts and policy - makers endorse pacifier use recommendations that are similar to those of the AAP, 272,273 concerns about possible deleterious effects of pacifier use have prevented others from making a recommendation for pacifier use as a risk reduction strategy.274 Although several observational studies275, — , 277 have found a correlation between pacifiers and reduced breastfeeding duration, the results of well - designed randomized clinical trials indicated that pacifiers do not seem to cause shortened breastfeeding duration for term and preterm infants.278, 279 The authors of 1 study reported a small deleterious effect of early pacifier introduction (2 — 5 days after birth) on exclusive breastfeeding at 1 month of age and on overall breastfeeding duration (defined as any breastfeeding), but early pacifier use did not adversely affect exclusive breastfeeding duration.

The duration of the intervention also seems to be an important factor for exclusive breastfeeding.

The authors note the effect of exclusive breastfeeding «seems to be plausible» since disease activity returned in the second half of the postpartum year in exclusively breastfeeding women, corresponding to the introduction of supplemental feedings and the return of menstruation.

Seems unlikely considering she didn't react to it during the exclusive breastfeeding stage.