I was not always happy with the revisions of old readings - they sometimes seem to
excuse human responsibility - but in the end evil is called evil and good is called good while an overly simple generalizations are avoided.
Not exact matches
To avoid facing up to this reality we argue that these conditions are exceptional, temporary, the result of personal inadequacy, necessary for national security or simply a reflection of «
human nature» — the prime
excuse for escaping
responsibility and avoiding action.
I think it would help to see two things: First, when the stakes are big, we ALL should live up to our
responsibilities as
humans: scientists don't have any real
excuse to only go to «B» and not to «C», «D', or whatever it takes to bring about responsible action.