In 2017, Republicans gained control of both houses of Congress and the White House for the first time in a decade, but unified GOP control of the legislative and executive branches didn't lead to a burst of lawmaking.
The executive branch did not that they would like a few changes to be made or considered in advance of this bill going forward to be approved
At that point all that would be needed is an all - powerful Executive Branch and a Supreme Court to ratify whatever
the Executive Branch does.
Yet another source of law is the Executive Order, where the president can decree that such and such will be the case (as long as it has something to do with what
the executive branch does).
Not exact matches
Just look at our current political situation: those worried about Trump have to contend with the fact that the power of the
executive branch has been dramatically expanded over the decades; we place immense responsibility and capability in the hands of one person, forgetting that said responsibility and capability is not so easily withdrawn if we don't like the one wielding it.
Karen Holdhouse, an analyst at Goldman Sachs, asked
executives on the corporation's first - quarter conference call what they would
do from an operational perspective if changing the company's communication strategies were not successful, and in particular, if the company planned to extend «an olive
branch» to Canadian Tim Hortons consumers or to its franchisees.
Shortly before his inauguration, The Washington Post noted several additional ways employees in Trump's
executive branch could
do so: Trademark disputes, for instance, will be adjudicated by judges appointed by his Commerce secretary, while the EPA could roll back environmental regulations that reduce profits at his golf courses.
Federal law
does not prohibit the president's involvement in private business while in office, even though lawmakers and
executive branch officials are subject to conflict - of - interest rules.
I thought it helpful to provide a rundown of the remaining legislative days» events and offer a bit of commentary about what Congress and the White House /
executive branch will be
doing between now and November.
It's very difficult to manage inflation just by determining whether government liabilities take the form of cash or government bonds (which is what the Fed
does) if you can't control the explosion of government liabilities itself (which only Congress and the
executive branch can
do).
In order to facilitate appropriate congressional oversight, the
Executive Branch may entrust classified information to the appropriate committees of Congress, as it has
done in connection with the Committee's oversight activities here.
TPA
does not provide new power to the
Executive Branch.
Non-examined czars, fast and furious, benghazi, iranian missiles, fiscal cliff — what has congress
done to protect American from corrupt
Executive Branch over the yeras?
He was a professional journalist, and though he had served in the
executive branch, he had
done so as a public - relations man.
In other words, an attempt by the Democrats controlling the House, Senate and
Executive branch, should never have attempted to «
do God's work» by trying to help the unisurable, uninsured and underinsured people in America.
What we object to is, first, the judicial manufacture of constitutional law to displace without constitutional warrant the duly enacted judgments of the people and their elected representatives, and, second, the idea of judicial supremacy that treats the
executive and legislative
branches of the federal government as impotent to
do anything but bow down before unconstitutional exercises of judicial power, however blatant and destructive of the constitutional order.
For our part, we, the people, will
do well to remember that every constitutional restraint, textual or judge - made, on the powers of the legislative and
executive branches is ipso facto and necessarily a transfer of power to the Court and the courts.
I don't see that as a «political» stance — that's a «I don't want a compromised person running the
executive branch of our government» stance.
But the reality of corruption in the
executive branch of government doesn't mean that allegations of corruption in the National Assembly especially as they relate to budget padding and constituency projects, should be minimized or ignored.
Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II «natural born citizen» based on the Kenyan / British citizenship of Barack Obama's father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a «citizen» born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having
done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all
Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to «support and defend the Constitution of the United States» as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II «natural born citizen».
But the President is the head of the
executive branch, so if he and an
executive branch official disagree on need - to - know, the President wins (it's less «checks and balances» and more «the boss can tell his subordinates what to
do»).
The full U.S. system is «
doing its thing,» and the result of that decentralized, bottom - up — and sometimes chaotic — process, which involves not only the three
branches of judiciary, legislature, and
executive, but also civil society, will ultimately result in a correction of draconian policy.
That doesn't mean a member of Congress or a judge can just demand to see some piece of classified information; they're not exempt from need - to - know (access to classified information requires both a clearance and need - to - know that information), and if they and the
executive branch disagree on need - to - know it can be resolved like any other interbranch conflict.
And that happens when the legislative
branch provides oversight of the
executive branch, which it is clearly charged with
doing.
We are
doing the
branch registration after that we are going to
do the
branch elections and every
branch will be required to elect its 9 member
executives and so when this
branch re-registration closes we will announce the date for
branch elections and when the date is announced for the district assembly
branch election of the Bole Bamboi constituency, I will be here to vote» he explained
«We don't have a parliament; we have two
branches of the
executive, one for proposing laws and taxes and loans; the other for dutifully approving them,» he stated in a Facebook post.
that explains what specifically
does - or
does not give the US
executive branch the right to choose to default on specific portions of debt despite having non-empty treasury?
The [Independent Counsel] Act, taken as a whole,
does not violate the principle of separation of powers by unduly interfering with the
Executive Branch's role.
«He's
done everything he can to kind of remove oversight form the
executive branch,» McMahon said.
Both sides will benefit, Democrats would get Downstate (which in my humble opinion should be called the Commonwealth of New Amsterdam after the most progressive city in Europe and in reference to the city's history), a guaranteed two seats in the US Senate (+1 because Gillibrand
did well Upstate in the last election, so 3 seats for the Democrats), guaranteed control of the Judicial, Legislative, and
Executive branches, and the once in a lifetime opportunity to write a state constitution to their own liking (firearms rights applies only to military and police, right to choose for women, protections for LGBT New Yorkers, etc)
When the Saxbe fix was used for Hillary Clinton, who had the same problem, there was some debate over whether it would be valid, due to the timing of when the raise by the
Executive Branch took effect compared to exactly when Clinton resigned from the Senate and when her term of service began at the State Dept.. The Constitutionality has nothing whatsoever to
do with Clinton's personal actions and these particulars would hold for others too if the timing was similar.
Nor
does the Act impermissibly undermine the powers of the
Executive Branch, or disrupt the proper balance between the coordinate
branches by preventing the
Executive Branch from accomplishing its constitutionally assigned functions.
That is what the indictment alleges Menendez
did when he met with or contacted officials in the
executive branch, purportedly to lobby on behalf of Melgen's business interests.
Or it might have risen from the manipulative county
executive branch, which controls more votes on the committee than
does the majority.
They believed Cuomo controlled the commission, and would have it focus only on alleged corruption by the legislature, and turn a blind eye to any allegations of wrong
doing from the
executive branch.
«I don't know many leaders of the
executive or legislative
branch anywhere that ignore millions and millions of people and think it will not have a consequence,» he said.
«Oversight of the
Executive Branch should not be
done by the
Executive Branch,» said Reinvent Albany
Executive Director John Kaehny, referring to a university whose board is controlled by the governor being investigated by an office headed by a Cuomo appointee.
While the
executive branch has to provide data on the racial and ethnic makeup of its staff for the public record, there is no rule mandating that congressional offices
do the same.
ICYMI: One of the 25 Moreland Commission members, Onondaga County
Executive Joanie Mahoney, said during a CapTon interview last night that the corruption - busting body is unlikely to train its sites on the executive branch, despite multiple calls (largely from legislators)
Executive Joanie Mahoney, said during a CapTon interview last night that the corruption - busting body is unlikely to train its sites on the
executive branch, despite multiple calls (largely from legislators)
executive branch, despite multiple calls (largely from legislators) to
do so.
Note that my derivation of the separation of powers from the rule of law
does not specify the extent to which the
executive branch is answerable to, or drawn from, the legislative branch; thus it neither endorses nor rejects the Westminster system per se, although it does warn against tight party discipline that results in a domination of Parliament by the E
executive branch is answerable to, or drawn from, the legislative
branch; thus it neither endorses nor rejects the Westminster system per se, although it
does warn against tight party discipline that results in a domination of Parliament by the
ExecutiveExecutive.
how is it democratic that Donald Trump is leading the
executive branch while he lost the popular vote (in which case it means that he
does not have the support from majority)?
Sam George invited me to a hotel around Dawhenya and requested me to work with him as an individual because of my personal capabilities which I declined and asked him to
do the right thing by inviting the entire
branch executives so we work for the good of the party, but not in our individual capabilities.
Flanagan also
did not rule out hearings into the
executive branch — something he has previously been hesitant to
do in the past.
@MichaelKingsmill - while what you said is technically true as far as passing laws, how
does that have any bearing on policy, which is
done via
executive orders and interpretation of laws passed by
executive branch for actioning?
Lawmakers could cry foul in court, saying that act doesn't apply to them given the separation of powers between the
executive and legislative
branches.
«I don't believe the
executive branch should have total say as to where these millions and millions of dollars of infrastructure repairs should go,» Skelos said.
Cuomo
did not seem bothered by the fact that a Moreland Act commission had never before been used to investigate the Legislature as an institution, and scholars suggested
doing so would likely be challenged for breaching the separation of powers between the legislative and
executive branches.
Flanagan
did not rule out hearings into the
executive branch, something he has previously been hesitant to
do.
«It makes little sense to establish a new
executive branch prosecutor to oversee a procurement process that takes place almost entirely within the
executive branch, rather than empower the attorney general — an independent statewide constitutional officer — to
do so,» Schneiderman wrote.
There's no reason to believe these items aren't related to the SAFE Act — but taking them away won't
do anything to stop the
executive branch from enforcing the law.