Sentences with phrase «exercise individual judgment»

Not exact matches

In particular, when you applaud the exercise of autonomous judgment or freedom by some individual, group, or company, ask whether you would still applaud it if the individual, group, or company had values different from your own.

These determinations can be murky, individuals may have multiple affiliations, and Daniel and I did this as an engaging but unfunded exercise — and I'm sure some of our judgment calls are eminently contestable.

They practice teamwork and collaboration with colleagues, while exercising individual inventiveness and judgment in their work with students.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General receives a complaint in writing signed by an individual to the effect that he is being deprived of or threatened with the loss of his right to the equal protection of the laws, on account of his race, color, religion, or national origin, by being denied equal utilization of any public facility which is owned, operated, or managed by or on behalf of any State or subdivision thereof, other than a public school or public college as defined in section 401 of title IV hereof, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly progress of desegregation in public facilities, the Attorney General is authorized to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section.

(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.

Power companies would be allowed to exercise their own judgment (subject to the normal regulatory oversight by individual states) as to whether electricity from natural gas would be more cost - effective than coal or wind or solar.

Most attempts at suppression rest on a denial of the fundamental premise of democracy: that the ordinary individual, by exercising critical judgment, will select the good and reject the bad.

Each member exercises its own individual judgments on all client matters.

In addressing this interest, both courts acknowledged that a state has an interest in: (i) preserving life in general; (ii) preventing deaths that occur as a result of errors in medical or legal judgment; (iii) preventing exercise of undue, arbitrary, and / or unfair influences over an individual's decision to end his / her life; (iv) safeguarding interests of innocent third parties such as minor children and other family members; (v) assuring the integrity of the medical profession; and (vi) avoiding the adverse consequences that might ensue if physician - assisted suicide were declared a fundamental right.

This wording incorporates two important Community law principles which are explained further in the same judgment: «It is settled case law that in the absence of Community rules governing the matter it is for the domestic legal system of each member state to... lay down the detailed procedural rules governing actions for safeguarding rights which individuals derive from Community law, provided, however, that such rules are not less favourable than those governing similar domestic actions (the principle of equivalence) and do not render virtually impossible or excessively difficult the exercise of rights conferred by Community law (the principle of effectiveness).»

To the extent that large law firms are no longer able to offer their lawyers meaningful opportunities to exercise and develop practical wisdom and professional judgment, that is, insofar as they are not able to sustain a credible promise to produce high quality work and provide quality training and mentorship to their associates, and as the number of large law firms continues to grow, decreasing the ability of each individual firm to represent a high number of elite clients, the large firms may find themselves unable to sustain a credible claim to elite professional status.

Furthermore, when a covered entity can not practicably obtain an individual's agreement before disclosing protected health information to a relative or to a person involved in the individual's care and is making decisions about such disclosures consistent with the exercise of professional judgment regarding the individual's best interest, covered entities must take into account whether such a disclosure is likely to put the individual at risk of serious harm.

We believe that any health professional, not just one of the individual's choice, will exercise appropriate professional judgment.

(i) A licensed health care professional has determined, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the access requested is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the individual or another person;

In the first case, a covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, must believe that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims.

The rule waives the requirement for individual agreement if the victim is unable to agree due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance and: (1) The law enforcement official represents that the protected health information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on such disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, determines that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

(A) The covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, believes the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or other potential victims; or

The final rule waives the requirement for agreement if the covered entity is unable to obtain the individual's agreement due to incapacity or other emergency circumstance, and (1) the law enforcement official represents that the information is needed to determine whether a violation of law by a person other than the victim has occurred and the information is not intended to be used against the victim; (2) the law enforcement official represents that immediate law enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure; and (3) the covered entity determines, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

In these circumstances, we believe it is appropriate to rely on the covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, to determine whether the disclosure is in the individual's best interests.

First, a covered entity need not inform the victim if the covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, believes that informing the individual would place the individual at risk of serious harm.

Procedures for disclosures to next of kin, other family members and persons assisting in an individual's care are also discussed in § 164.510 (b), which allows the covered entity to exercise professional judgment as to whether the disclosure is in the individual's best interest when the individual is not available to agree to the disclosure or is incapacitated.

When the individual is present and has the capacity to make his or her own decisions, a covered entity may disclose protected health information only if the covered entity: (1) Obtains the individual's agreement to disclose to the third parties involved in their care; (2) provides the individual with an opportunity to object to such disclosure and the individual does not express an objection; or (3) reasonably infers from the circumstances, based on the exercise of professional judgment, that the individual does not object to the disclosure.

Covered health care providers may, in some circumstances and consistent with any known prior preferences of the individual, exercise professional judgment in the individual's best interest to not disclose directory information.

In exceptional circumstances, where even this informal discussion can not practicably take place, covered entities are permitted to make decisions regarding disclosure or use based on the exercise of professional judgment of what is in the individual's best interest.

By allowing covered entities, in the exercise of professional judgment, to determine whether such disclosures are in the individual's best interests, the final rule recognizes the importance of the provider - patient relationship.

Under § 164.510 (b), when an individual is present and has the capacity to make his or her own decisions, a covered entity may disclose protected health information only if the covered entity: (1) Obtains the individual's agreement to disclose protected health information to the third parties involved in the individual's care; (2) provides the individual with an opportunity to object to such disclosure, and the individual does not express an objection; or (3) reasonably infers from the circumstances, based on the exercise of professional judgment, that the individual does not object to the disclosure.

First, as in the proposed rule, covered entities may deny individuals access to protected health information about them if a licensed health care professional has determined, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the access requested is reasonably likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the individual or another person.

Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.

Third, the exception applies to protected health information created or received in treatment situations where there are substantial barriers to communicating with the individual and, in the exercise of professional judgment, the covered provider clearly infers from the circumstances the individual's consent to receive treatment.

As stated in the preamble, we intend for this exercise of professional judgment in the individual's best interest to account for the potential for harm to the individual in cases involving domestic violence.

(B) In the individual's best interest as determined by the covered health care provider, in the exercise of professional judgment.

(iii) The request for access is made by the individual's personal representative and a licensed health care professional has determined, in the exercise of professional judgment, that the provision of access to such personal representative is reasonably likely to cause substantial harm to the individual or another person.

Section 164.510 (b) of the final rule, disclosures to family or friends involved in the individual's care, states that when an individual is unable to agree or object to the disclosure due to incapacity or another emergency situation, a covered entity must determine based on the exercise of professional judgment whether it is in the individual's best interest to disclose the information.

(i) The covered entity, in the exercise of professional judgment, believes informing the individual would place the individual at risk of serious harm; or

Ability to actively listen and exercise good individual judgment.?

• Extensive experience of operating presses, with excellent ability to monitor production • Outstanding knowledge of quality control analysis • Excellent ability in exercising judgment and decision making to choose relevant action • Skilled in thinking critically to identify strengths and weaknesses of actions • Experience in troubleshooting to establish causes of production errors • Documented success in selecting the right equipment for the job • Competent at planning and organization with a strong ability to prioritize to meet tight deadlines • Familiar with industry standards as well as OSHA requirements • Well - versed in repairing press machines • Exceptional multitasking skills, with powerful ability to respond to multiple simultaneous requests • A self - motivated individual with ability to manage production cell when needed • Familiarity with solving complex problems to ensure operations keep running smoothly • Excellent hand - eye coordination aimed at handling press operations with profoundness and excellence • Effective communication and listening abilities, targeted at working with the team to ensure understanding and hence efficient production

Consistently exercise discretion and judgment to analyze, interpret, make decisions and decide what actions are necessary based on the varying facts and circumstances of each individual case.