Sentences with phrase «exist as human beings»

Even if these characters have love interests, the main point of their identity is to exist as human beings in their own right.

Ever since we exist as human beings on this planet, the idea of finding the love of our life has always been rooted deeply in our consciousness.

***** Every week I receive two or three e-mails asking me whether Jesus existed as a human being.

My existing as a human being tomorrow does not entail that I shall exist having a broken leg tomorrow.

All my existing as a human being entails is that I exist in some concrete state or other displaying those abstract properties by virtue of which I am a human being, plus whatever other contingent properties that state includes.

To exist as human is to exist as an instance of «becoming» or developing (for better or worse) and also to belong with others of our kind in a great enterprise to which each one of us makes her or his contribution, for good or for ill.

To exist as a human being is for better, for worse to be an ethical creature.

The title given this book, Becoming and Belonging, indicates the general approach that I have taken: to exist as human is to exist as an instance of «becoming» or developing (for better or worse) and is also to belong with others of our kind in a great enterprise in which each one of us belongs and to which each one of us makes her or his contribution, for good or for ill.

Not exact matches

As human beings, we frame new phenomenon using our existing mental models, which means we need to think differently in order to succeed in this new era of digital change.

Debbie Cook, the former mayor of Huntington Beach, California, was one of the first investors: «I thought, How can I invest in something that will actually be an asset for as long as humans exist and grow their own food?»

A similar trend likely exists in human fathers, to the point some researchers think elevated levels of vasopressin in dads helps explain why they tend to be more tactile and stimulatory with infants as opposed to soothing and comforting (as is more typical with moms).

Its power is based on the simple human desire to be connected and the tools that now exist to enable you, as an individual to fill that desire.

First, he would have to have existed, then be reborn as a human, then killed as a human to pay some ransom price he set on our heads for the sin of eating his fruit from the tree he happened to plant right next to the hungry humans he just made.

But the most amazing thing of all is how some people interpret this very human knowledge as proof that their god exists.

if the first pair would nothave sinned they would still be here and all human kind would know is the ways of almighty God and existing on a paradise earth — wich still is comming.the reason he didn't destroy Satan immediately is because he posed a Question as to almighty Gods right to sovereignty..

When I ask them, «How many of you think something in addition to evolution accounts for humans being on earth as we now exist?»

To me the world has been predetermined ever since the beginning of time with programs such as evolution and expansion set up just right, as a perfectly aligned series of dominoes, so that humans could come to exist.

I believe God Does Exist and we as humans are exploring this universe and trying to figure out how He Did It thus making sicence a full time commitment..

I am offended when human beings, such as Pastor Dan, believe they have some special authority to know who would go to hell if it existed.

We conservatives think that nature exists to be used well by the human person, just as we think that human nature isn't an oxymoron.

Maybe the Bible is a total human invention and God, should he exist, created the universe just as science sees it, leaving zero trace of his existence?

Yet, thinkers from Edmund Burke to Russell Kirk have shown the deeply anti-conservative bases of the social contract theory of Lockean (and Hobbesian) origin, one that is premised upon a conception of human beings as naturally «free and independent,» as autonomous individuals who are thought to exist by nature detached from a web of relationships that include family, community, Church, region, and so on.

LOL: The Christian perspective is that God does indeed exist, and because of that, all human beings (including the ones who deny His very existence) are still endowed with some of the gifts He's given us — such as some capacity to reason, create, and love, though all imperfectly.

There is no other way, in fact, for us to exist as true community... the ultimate community being the whole human race.

Then you might understand that Christian god as described in the bible is not loving, doesn't give a hoot about human suffering, and in fact does not exist.

If human life is only a part of the cosmos, then it exists for the sake of the cosmos — as surely as an arm functions for the sake of the whole body.

(Matt 5:3) The universe and all life is evidence that someone who is surpassingly greater than us exists and we as humans are an essential part of his «eternal purpose».

This was because the fallen angels (sons of God) existed before creation (before man) had intermarried with the human race (daughters of man) as a devil's plan in order to stop, corrupt man's seed which was God's plan to that seed will bruise Satan's head.....

Let us now reflect on what mathematics is: in itself, it is an abstract system, an invention of the human spirit which as such in its purity does not exist.

Acts 17:24 - 28 «24 The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; 25 nor is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all people life and breath and all things; 26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation, 27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; 28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, «For we also are His children.»»

I am grateful that integrity, loyalty, compassion, tenacity still exist as human traits.

For he is determined finally and forever to be reconciled with the human race, and the enmity which exists can only be overcome if he takes all wrath — his as well as ours — up into himself.

God is evolution in His process of will implementation, humanity change in this process but not necesarily aware because our existence is very limited in time.and we are not as individual the ultimate objective, but God himself, Our existence is just part of the process for Him to become Himself in the future.We exist only in our time of existence.From pure Energy which is Him 13.7 billion years ago, to us humans 200,000 years ago, to what we are now today, to super humans in the future, to what He will be in the far Future.THE ULTIMATE HIMSELF Is the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOis evolution in His process of will implementation, humanity change in this process but not necesarily aware because our existence is very limited in time.and we are not as individual the ultimate objective, but God himself, Our existence is just part of the process for Him to become Himself in the future.We exist only in our time of existence.From pure Energy which is Him 13.7 billion years ago, to us humans 200,000 years ago, to what we are now today, to super humans in the future, to what He will be in the far Future.THE ULTIMATE HIMSELF Is the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOis very limited in time.and we are not as individual the ultimate objective, but God himself, Our existence is just part of the process for Him to become Himself in the future.We exist only in our time of existence.From pure Energy which is Him 13.7 billion years ago, to us humans 200,000 years ago, to what we are now today, to super humans in the future, to what He will be in the far Future.THE ULTIMATE HIMSELF Is the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOis just part of the process for Him to become Himself in the future.We exist only in our time of existence.From pure Energy which is Him 13.7 billion years ago, to us humans 200,000 years ago, to what we are now today, to super humans in the future, to what He will be in the far Future.THE ULTIMATE HIMSELF Is the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOis Him 13.7 billion years ago, to us humans 200,000 years ago, to what we are now today, to super humans in the future, to what He will be in the far Future.THE ULTIMATE HIMSELF Is the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOIs the objetive, you are just part of the process you IDIOT.

His point was that human language could convey knowledge of God, which meant that any form of revelation communicated the truth as it existed objectively first in God's mind and then in the structures of the world.

The human being, has been expropriated of his basic rights: as a «human resource», he / she only has the right to exist as a function of profitability and of what is now known as «employability», a concept which has replaced that of the «right to work».

If something so important for each individual is dependent upon accepting / rejecting a supposed scriptural «truth» (as you define it) then make the case for how it makes any sense at all that humans would be judged negatively for rejecting something they have no idea exists!!

As emotionally compelling of an idea as a soul may be, there is absolutely no evidence what - so - ever that a soul exists outside the cognitive functions of the very material human braiAs emotionally compelling of an idea as a soul may be, there is absolutely no evidence what - so - ever that a soul exists outside the cognitive functions of the very material human braias a soul may be, there is absolutely no evidence what - so - ever that a soul exists outside the cognitive functions of the very material human brain.

Unless we are totally blind to human situations as they really exist, we can not avoid the conclusion that without a revolutionary quality of living the human race is doomed to an endless process of unproductive suffering or even of total extinction.

Once God has ceased to exist in human experience as the omnipotent and numinous Lord, there perishes with him every moral imperative addressed to man from a beyond, and humanity ceases to be imprisoned by an obedience to an external will or authority.

At the peak of that unfolding equation, matter is gathered into ontological unity with directly created spirit to form human nature, which exists in direct and personal relationship to God who is the Living Environment of grace and providence for every human being and for mankind as a whole.

Insofar as such structures and institutions are of legal character they may, of course) be regarded as merely human and thus mutable, not necessary laws, because they did not always exist but have been — or have still to be — established.

Undoubtedly a certain insight was promoted in regard to such questions as how the papal primacy and the episcopacy founded by Christ can exist and work together in the Church, how the necessity of the Church for salvation is compatible with the possibility of salvation of a human being who does not belong to it, how in the realm of grace each of the regenerate can depend on every other and so above all on Mary, while there is nevertheless only one mediator between God and man, Jesus Christ.

As created by God, human destiny is to exist in the image of God, a destiny visible in human «openness to the world.»

Now, Gudorf contends, present inroads on this tradition insist that: «1) bodily experience can reveal the divine, 2) affectivity is as essential as rationality to true Christian love, 3) Christian love exists not to bind autonomous selves, but as the proper form of connection between beings who become human persons in relation, and 4) the experience of bodily pleasure is important in creating the ability to trust and love others, including God.»

That said, the case has been made that if the Christian god exists, then «God should be detectable by scientific means simply by virtue of the fact that he is supposed to play such a central role in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans», with the conclusion that» [e] xisting scientific models contain no place where God is included as an ingredient in order to describe observations.»

Interestingly, even secular non-believing historians have debunked the «never existed» myth... Jesus is still under attack today as He was two thousand years ago... Efforts to rid human history of His existence, and reason for coming here have failed, and continue to fail.

If the marks of God's intelligent design are ubiquitous and if human beings know intuitively that God exists, why are they so unresponsive to the world as the theater of God's glory?

It is people like these who need to rediscover their humanity through Christ; the human beings who are defined and described in our theological abstractions exist only as idealized, abstract specimens of humanity.

In taking this sixth step, Christians affirm that the «tendency toward the human and the humane (toward «Christ») in the ultimate nature of things» which has existed since the beginning of time «has become evident and clear only now in the new order of relationships just coming into view» in the Christian community To be sure, «any community which becomes a vehicle in history of more profoundly humane patterns of life» can be a part of this new order, but the events around Jesus have at least a kind of priority as its first clear manifestation.

This is wrong: (1) it might not be possible to «judge» human laws in a supernatural way, especially when the supernatural hasn't been shown to exist; (2) we as humans judge human laws all the time — we do it through philosophy, political science, and economics, for instance.