It is the manifestation of
existence of a particular kind that is important, not its activity, or lack thereof.
Not exact matches
And it should at once be noted also that as long as such a Church law is in
existence, the character
of its obligation, the possibility
of being excused or dispensed from it, the possibility
of discussing its expediency or the need to change it, the possibility
of knowing oneself not bound by it in a
particular concrete case etc., are
of quite a different
kind from any case in which an immutable divine commandment is involved.
If
existence is identified with process, which is the questionable move in all «process philosophies,» all existents can only be analyzed in terms
of the consequences
of this temporal direction as applied to each
particular kind of existent.
He chooses to give it the broadest possible sense: «Any
kind of stabilized organization (
of matter) implies the
existence of teleological dimensions»; thus, «virtually any
of the main aspects
of our world can be taken as a
particular case
of teleology.»
What in an older
kind of philosophy would have been called the chain -
of - cause - and - effect is here seen as being very much richer; it is a congeries
of occasions, events, pressures, movements, routes, which come to focus at this or that point, and which for their explanation require some principle that has brought and still is bringing each
of them, rather than some other possible occurrence, into this
particular concrete moment
of what we commonly style «
existence».
It is obviously true that the
existence of an expert consensus on any scientific theory does not constitute any
kind of logical proof that that
particular opinion is correct.