In the longer term they predict
the existence of an anthropogenic global warming we must all try to reduce by emission control.
[1] It is probably the best known and most frequently quoted petition used by those who wish to deny there is a scientific consensus in respect of
the existence of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
ts why it's perfectly possible to «believe» in
the existence of anthropogenic global warming without feeling the urge to bomb the global economy back to the dark ages in order to mitigate it.
REMOVING THE LINEAR EFFECTS OF ENSO AND VOLCANIC AEROSOLS HELP TO SHOW THE TIMING OF THE WARMING Many papers and blog posts that attempt to prove
the existence of anthropogenic global warming remove the obvious linear effects of El Niño - Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events and of stratospheric aerosols discharged by explosive volcanic eruptions.
Not exact matches
The underlying problem in all
of this is that a large number
of scientists have an incredibly strong vested interest in the «
existence»
of anthropogenic global warming.
Somehow, we are to believe that the mountainous scientific corpus that overwhelmingly demonstrates the
existence of global warming and its
anthropogenic genesis is a vast conspiracy, one involving thousands
of scientists and other professionals.