But it will preview what some experts call a potentially
existential threat to the power grids of the United States and other nations, and the populations that depend on them.
Not exact matches
The challenge for Albany reformers is that the most important reforms are almost impossible
to win because they are perceived by the
powers that be as an
existential threat.
Some Murdoch papers are running an ad that seeks
to guarantee > 1.5, by claiming the world needs 1,200 more coal burning
power plants
to stave off the
existential threat of the next Ice Age
The real
threat, the
existential threat, is that climate change will gain so much momentum that humanity loses what remaining
power it has
to slow or stop it, even by reducing carbon emissions
to zero.
The
powers that be are not prepared for this and the general population is unknowingly being exposed
to this
existential threat.
If «progressive leaders» of the 1990s really believed that CAGW is an
existential threat, then centralizing
power to solve that particular problem was not out of character for «progressive leaders».
If you believed there was a real
existential threat to the planet, my guess is you probably wouldn't have a problem with strong, concerted government action using centralized
power to address it.