Not exact matches
extend the
existing right
for an employee to request flexible working
arrangements to new groups of people,
for example parents of older
children and carers of sick and disabled adults.
If the other parent doesn't agree, you can request a court to hold a hearing, where you can lay out your justification
for altering the
existing child support
arrangement.
Exceptions
exist for children born in multiple births, adopted
children, non-parental care
arrangements and what the Government call «non-consensual conception», more commonly referred to as the rape exception.
Stand
for Children exists to challenge the conventional power
arrangements of the K - 12 public education system, organizing parents at the grassroots level to advance a school reform agenda.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the
child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the
child; (3) the preferences of each
child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the
child with each parent, the
child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the
child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent
child relationship between the
child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the
child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the
child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the
child; (10) the
child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the
child's
existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial
arrangement is not in the best interest of the
child; (13) the
child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the
child or a sibling of the
child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or
child abuse or the effect on the
child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the
child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the
child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated
for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.
Thereafter,
existing Child Support Agency cases will be gradually closed and by around 2018 they will all have extinguished with the resident parent having the option to apply to the
Child Maintenance Service or to go
for a consensual
arrangement.
Individuals seeking court ordered changes to
existing Child Custody
Arrangements will be required to file custody modification forms that specify details of the reasons
for the request and the proposed solution.
If you are facing separation or divorce, or need to change
existing agreements, family mediation can help you sort
arrangements for children, property, finance and other important matters:
[13] He considered (1) the
existing shared parenting
arrangement and the relationship between the
children and Ms. G; (2) the
existing shared parenting
arrangement and the relationship between the
children and Mr. S; (3) the desirability of maximizing contact between the
children and both parents; (4) the views of the
children, which had not been canvassed; (5) Ms. G's reason
for moving; (6) the disruption to the
children of a change in custody; (7) the disruption to the
children consequent on removal from family, schools, and community; and (8) various other factors, such as Mr. S's economic stability, the importance of the paternal grandparents, the location of the proposed residence at Moyie Lake on a leased lot at an RV park, the girls» relationship with Mr. G and his
children, and Ms. G's inflexibility.
Having parents break up is difficult enough
for children; judges are very reluctant to force additional trauma by radically changing an
existing custody
arrangement.
If an
existing court order no longer reflects current
arrangements for a
child, it should be changed.
If an
existing parenting order no longer reflects current
arrangements for a
child or the other party can not reasonably comply you can ask the court to make an order to vary the
existing order.
In order to determine if such a shared custody
arrangement existed, the court stated that the critical factor in making such a determination is the division of time regarding «each party's responsibility
for the custodial functions, responsibilities and duties» normally performed by the
child's primary caretaker.
A verbal or written agreement (that wasn't entered with the courts) sometimes
exists and makes
for perfectly fine
arrangement for child custody, without going to court.
The pressure is often applied to a non-custodial parent, usually the father, despite the fact that they may have a very compelling case
for a shared parenting (50/50
child custody) or a change in the
existing child custody
arrangement.
Generally, those factors include the parents» wishes and ability to provide
for the
child, in addition to the current
child custody
arrangement and the
child's
existing relationship with each parent.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the
child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the
child; (3) the preferences of each
child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the
child with each parent, the
child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the
child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent
child relationship between the
child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the
child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the
child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the
child; (10) the
child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the
child's
existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial
arrangement is not in the best interest of the
child; (13) the
child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the
child or a sibling of the
child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or
child abuse or the effect on the
child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the
child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the
child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated
for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary
The possible sanctions include: compensatory time with the
children; economic sanctions
for costs incurred by the non-violator parent due to the other parent's custody or parenting time violation; modification of the
existing transportation (pick up / drop off
arrangements)-- including changing the exchange location to a public place; ordering counseling
for either or both of the parties and / or the
children at the expense of the violator; ordering a temporary or permanent modification of the parenting time and custodial
arrangement if under the circumstances this relief is in the best interests of the
children; ordering the violator to participate in a community service program; incarceration of the violator with or without work - release; issuance of a warrant to be executed if the violator persists in failing to comply with court orders; any other appropriate equitable remedy.
In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity
for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need
for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits
for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein
for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any
children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other
existing debts; (14)
child custody
arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.