Not exact matches
The AI scientists claim the university is developing
autonomous weapons, or «killer robots,» whereas university officials say the goal of the research is to improve
existing defense
systems.
Based on these touchpoints, states should be prepared to explain how control is applied over
existing weapons systems, especially those with certain
autonomous or automatic functions.
These questions do not however
exist only for LAWS, but also for enhanced
autonomous functions of
weapons systems in general.
[3] The US affirmed in November 2015 that «there is broad agreement that lethal
autonomous weapon systems do not
exist» and do not refer to «remotely piloted drones, nor precision - guided munitions or defensive
systems.»
These could include, inter alia, the ability of a fully
autonomous system to conform to
existing law (including international humanitarian law, human rights law or general international law); potential problems associated with the design of future fully
autonomous weapons that could require disarmament action, or the ethical limits to robotic autonomy in deciding on the life or death of a human, to quote just a few.»
At this week's CCW Fifth Review Conference, China for the first time said it sees a need for a new international instrument on lethal
autonomous weapons systems, as it questioned the adequacy of
existing international law to deal with the challenges posed.
The US and others state that lethal
autonomous weapon systems «do not
exist» and do not encompass remotely piloted drones, precision - guided munitions, or defensive
systems.