This raises a red flag with your creditor and they have every reason to be cautious because
the existing evidence points to that direction.
Not exact matches
Your case should include clear, hard, indisputable research and
evidence that a real problem
exists in your marketplace that
points to only one reasoning: that you (the expert) have the solution.
Most cryptocurrencies are still up a considerable amount since the start of last year which some will
point to as
evidence that they have a lot further to fall and others as
evidence of the belief that still
exists in the space.
All of this is beside the
point, however, because the default position in any belief is
evidence — meaning, something
exists if there is
evidence for it, otherwise the default position is to believe only what has been proven to
exist.
You start out so strong... As you
pointed out, there's no reasonable
evidence that a historical Jesus even
existed, so to suggest that this is
evidence of some «error» doesn't make sense.
As an atheist I have no problem saying «I don't know» if someone asks me if god
exists or not, but the
evidence points so far that god is fictional and I operate within a world were there isn't a god.
What I actually do is
point out that is, in fact, no
evidence or reason to believe such a being
exists.
You spend a lot of words reiterating this statement, but aside from
pointing to the Bible, you offer nothing but your claim that
evidence exists.
At this
point I won't invest time or energy seeking God for the same reason I won't invest time and energy digging up my yard seeking buried treasure, traveling to Ireland seeking leprechauns, or traveling to the North Pole seeking Santa Claus: Until I see some
evidence any of these
exist I see any of these pursuits as a complete waste of time.
Perhaps you didn't mean what you wrote, but that clearly implies
evidence exists that
points to flaws in the reasoning and logic specific to atheism.
There is no
evidence to
point to baby jesus being born any time sooner than spring (if he
existed at all).
In reference to your disdain for
pointing out «lies», please provide verifiable
evidence (with references, of course) that your god
exists.
My biggest
point is that an almighty god left no solid
evidence that Jesus ever
existed, let alone was the Messiah.
While all
evidence, logic and reasoning
point to a Creator and absolute truth, you prefer to hide behind relativism and a theory of evolution which does not, in fact, describe the creation of the universe at all, or why concepts of good and evil or morality
exist.
As a matter of fact, there doesn't
exist any book that has
evidence and guidance like the Quran in the world today (and up until this
point).
I made an illusion to the fact that there are other things that obviously
exist without
evidence to others and asked for him to prove his
point.
Sorry kermi, A soul is pertinent to your religion / religion in general and no
evidence exists for it, so your
point is moot.
As for failure to show that God
exists, as I've asked elsewhere, just what kind of «
evidence» are you looking for, and just how long do you think it is going to be before you begin to contradict yourself, when it is
pointed out to you that your empirical demand for «
evidence» will only take you so far when it comes to knowing anything?
To this
point no one has ever shown any
evidence that any gods
exist.
I suspect you don't believe in Zeus, Odin, or Vishnu and yet you have no
evidence that they do not
exist — your (valid)
point would be that no
evidence has been presented to show that they do.
The literary
evidence that the expectation of a «Messiah,» in so far as such an expectation
existed at all, took these several forms is indisputable, although at
points meager, and can be found cited in Charles and other writers on Jewish eschatology.
In fact, the
evidence points more towards the idea that he did not
exist.
In
point of fact, no
evidence whatsoever is offered to prove that this couple was maritally successful in any way; actually a great deal of
evidence exists to the contrary.
@HS: Your god does not
exist and until you can provide the
evidence (which you have been asked for on numerous occasions), you have no
point.
Indeed, the direct
evidence that in fact
exists, and it is not slight, contradicts, almost
point for
point, each of Ford's attributions.
Perhaps if humanity survives it's religious zealots and
exists for many millennia to come, we may gather enough
evidence to
point us in the right direction to answering that huge question about what caused the Universe to be.
When you provide
evidence that your god or jesus
exists, then you can spew your distaste of this woman but until that
point, let her rest in peace and have some respect for the deceased!
Point and match goes to Voice of Reason, mainly because the universe has
existed for quite some time without
evidence for God.
Michael Behe (in The Edge of Evolution)
points out that there is abundant
evidence for «microevolution» (smaller population change), but there is a boundary at which the
evidence for microevolution stops and
evidence for macroevolution either doesn't
exist, or any clues that do
exist are beset with problems so serious that explanatory attempts boil down to «just - so - stories.»
Black holes do indeed
exist... we even have photographic
evidence of stars whipping around an invisible (thus black) massive gravitational
point at the core of our own galaxy.
Without a battalion of secretaries to gather all the things I could bring together as a body of
evidence, I am cast upon the shores of typing arguments on the internet trying to
point at enough solid facts that directly correlate to the definite impossibility of any god
existing as gods are defined.
No research
exists at this
point to know whether a child would find better things to do with his or her time if all screens were turned off, although
evidence suggests that the child would hear more adult speech and talk more.6 Heavy media use is defined as the television being on always or most of the time.
Grandeau
pointed to one member, Touro Law Dean Patricia Salkin, as
evidence this new entity, like others, was too closely connected to the
existing infrastructure of state government.
Others, like me, are convinced that no theoretical or empirical
evidence exists for such a claim, and that a widespread belief in the existence of such a
point of no return threatens to push ecological science and its application in the wrong direction.
Lead author Caroline Roullier emphasizes that although her genetic analysis alone doesn't prove that premodern Polynesians made contact with South America, it strongly supports the
existing archaeological and linguistic
evidence pointing to that conclusion.
In an opinion piece in the journal, Dr Early and her colleagues suggest an innovative framework, based on
existing evidence, that provides guidelines on other characteristics that might
point more accurately to which species are likely to survive.
He is quick to
point out that much of the
existing research around vitamin D was poorly executed and consists of poor quality
evidence.
The researchers
point to the speed at which each subject recovered voluntary movement as
evidence that there may be dormant connections that
exist in patients with complete motor paralysis.
A number of scientific results suggest a biological basis for sexual orientation, but these results do not
point to one simple biological or genetic explanation.2 Perhaps the best recent reviews of the scientific research relevant to this issue are found in a special issue of the journal Frontiers of Neuroendocrinology, the official journal of the International Neuroendocrine Federation and the American Neuroendocrine Society, that was published in April 2011.3 The papers in the special issue make clear that substantial
evidence exists in animals for biological bases of sexual partner preference based on sex.
The costs of paying new teachers on the
evidence - based schedule while keeping
existing teachers on the traditional schedule would peak after 10 years, at which
point savings associated with the flattened rewards for experience would begin to outweigh the costs of higher salaries to younger teachers.
Evidence gathered indicates that learners want a simple single
point of destination for this interaction, so integrating a social learning element with an
existing Learning Management System (LMS) is the optimum solution.
And while all the
evidence points to an unfortunate fall, Maisie soon finds that plenty of possible motives
exist for Nick's murder.
While academics
point to a large body of
evidence in support of EMH, an equal amount of dissension also
exists.
As I have
pointed out, there is no
evidence that the claimed global trend in aerosols
existed.
Simonjm, the depressing part (or perhaps the encouraging part) is that after all the abuse I've taken, after JQs proud boasting on the top of the page and his claims that I'm in denial about the reams of
evidence that he has claimed
exists, the total amount of
evidence that has been offered (not put up and rejected, but offered) in support of Prof. Quiggins claims has been... well, not to put too fine a
point on it, the total of offered
evidence has been zero.
They are always able to come up with an explanation for any scientific data
pointing to the world
existing for longer than 6000 years; and they will never be convinced by any
evidence because they «know» that come what may the Bible is always true.
Supporters
point to 20 reviews, mainly of
existing literature, held in various countries that have found no conclusive
evidence linking turbine operations with poor health.
It is
pointed out only on the basis of how strong the
evidence is that it has reached a level of near unanimous scientific agreement (just as a consensus
exists that gravity
exists).
We just question the certainty of how much warming has occurred, whether CO2 is the «thermostat» which overides natural variation in temperature and don't see enough
evidence that the Earth is somehow «out of whack» and on the verge of some «tipping
point» if such a thing
exists at all.
No matter how well informed you are, no matter how many peer - reviewed studies you cite, or how many times you
point out the overwhelming agreement based on the
evidence that
exists among climate scientists that global warming is real and is principally caused by human fossil fuel use, you will get no where.