Sentences with phrase «existing fact made»

Not exact matches

Demand for Exxon oil exists despite the fact that using it makes many consumers feel guilty.

It had to partner with more than 300 food vendors to make those «clean» menu changes, a process that Panera director of wellness Sara Burnett said took a lot of time but was made easier by the fact Panera often worked with existing vendors to make the switch.

The DOL's former head of wage enforcement, David Weil, recently suggested that weighing whether gig economy workers should be classified as employees or independent contractors is not so different than making the same determination for workers at brick - and - mortar businesses.84 Existing legal tests to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor are multifactor, fact - based exercises based on the level of control a company exerts over the workers in question.

Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period, or if they relate to facts and circumstances that did not exist at the acquisition date, are recorded in the Company's provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.

Changes to these uncertain tax positions and tax related valuation allowances made subsequent to the measurement period, or if they relate to facts and circumstances that did not exist at the acquisition date, are recorded in our provision for income taxes in our consolidated statement of operations.

So even if we can plausibly imagine that a slightly better Morsi and a slightly more disciplined opposition might have existed and could have made better choices over the course of the last year, and thus allowed the fragile shoot of democratic compromise to take hold, these choices weren't made, and so the chasm between the liberals and the faithful, and the dependence of the former upon the army, are now simply the facts of Egyptian situation, the ones that one must now work from, right?

You said, «You have every right not to believe in God, but there are no facts that make it obvious that God doesn't exist.

Taking everything we know it boils down to the fact that you can't make something from nothing so we must believe that something always existed, the choices are matter or a creator.

The fact is you do not make the rules, the world exists with or without you.

@fimilleur from time to time mankind experiences the presence of God, there have been and continue to be events that testify to the presence of Him.The multiple gods you continually point to have an unique difference from the God who first revealed His presence to ancient men i.e. the Hebrews.The particular gods you mention roman etc. are all man made and in many instances men themselves i.e. hercules, but even the ancient greeks realized the limitations of their understanding and included an «unknown» God in their worship structure.many cultures did likewise, having a glimpse of God but not the fullness of understanding that was given to the Jews.Whether or not «we» believe, does not alter the fact that God exists as an unique being, whether or not «we» acknowledge Him «we» will stand before Him.You do not choose to understand, but we are actually standing in His presence right now as He is much bigger than the doctrines and knowledge man ascribes to Him those things you find so questionable are the misconceptions and misrepresentations of God made by men throughout history.

But Science is Can be Proof in If You Have The Time, Equipement and knowledge you can try to disprove every scientific Conclusion ever made if you have the time and resources.The Fact that the God Is A Unknown Fills Me With skepticism.No Hard Proof He exist Makes I Flawed science

If it is not necessary that there be finite actualities, and if in fact they have not always existed, it makes no sense to talk about necessary principles governing their mutual relations and therefore limiting what God can do with them.

The onus (look it up, dear) is on you to prove your god exists if you're going to make statements of fact.

And, what are we to make of the fact that we have learned that the «original sin» that you required the torture and murder of your own son / self was a mere myth about a couple who never existed?

Since we can manipulate the mind well enough to make you believe illusions are real and the fact that you can not prove that you exist without referencing something outside yourself (which might be what is being manipulated), you can not prove you exist.

No doubt there have been and are many people who have come to America simply to transplant their existing culture onto new soil — in fact, you can make the argument that that was how America was founded in the first place.

That said, the case has been made that if the Christian god exists, then «God should be detectable by scientific means simply by virtue of the fact that he is supposed to play such a central role in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans», with the conclusion that» [e] xisting scientific models contain no place where God is included as an ingredient in order to describe observations.»

A serious problem exists, because nobody has in fact succeeded in making this kind of a theory.

By contrast, since what makes the statement «I exist» true is a wholly contingent state of affairs, it is in fact falsifiable, even though I myself could never falsify it, insofar as none of the other statements that would have to be true in order for it to be true would be an unavoidable belief for God or a statement that would necessarily apply through his experiences.

I made an illusion to the fact that there are other things that obviously exist without evidence to others and asked for him to prove his point.

The fact that not having a God would make something difficult does not mean that a God must therefore exist.

but even if you were right, the simple fact that only one can be right, doesn't make the existence of God any more or less likely — your leap from a particular religion might be wrong to God does not exist is not maintainable.

The fact that vampires don't exist doesn't prove that God does, of course, but it does seem to shore up the anthropic principle, making the fine - tuning inference more reasonable and probable than its alternative.

It's a good thing god loves you Tim Tebow and not the people who could actually use his assistance (if he in fact existed, which he doesn't, but hey, continue fooling yourself... its making a lot of people very powerful and rich).

If change really involves self - transcendence even, in certain circumstances, to a new essence, even though only in virtue of the dynamism of absolute Being, which of course does not, let it be repeated, alter the fact that it is a question of self - transcendence; if matter and spirit are not simply disparate in nature but matter is in a certain way «solidified» spirit, the only significance of which is to serve to make actual spirit possible, then an evolutionary development of matter towards spirit is not an inconceivable idea.15 If there exists at all by virtue of the motion of absolute Being, a change in the material order whereby this rises above itself, then this self - transcendence can only occur in the direction of spirit, because the absolute Being is spirit.

A lack of fact in proving the existence of a god and a lack of fact proving that there is no omnipotent being who does not want to be made known but would rather have us develop faith in said omnipotent being, but since there are those who say well since there is no proof that such a being exists then I will conclude that no such being exists even though there is no proof established to verify that claim either.

The fact that there has in fact been no showing makes the notion that the Abrahamic god ever existed preposterous on its face.

The fact that Germany is doing well does not prove a god or jesus... you have to prove they exist (ed) first to make such a claim.

The point I am making is that in whatever sense he believes the universe will no longer exist FOR HIM upon his death, he has no proof that this in fact is true, So even if he thinks the universe will continue to exist after his death, but because he will be dead he will not be able to perceive its existence.

So im confused as to why the final resolve is always «prove god exists, and ill believe it» when in fact, the very concept of this proof is that it falls apart, and does nt make it true.

European concerns about Hollywood films are largely based upon the existing trade deficit with the USA in audiovisual trade and the fact that over half of the movies exhibited in European cinemas are made in the USA against only 2 % European films released in the USA.

But encountering a 500 - page book listing hundreds of apparent biblical contradictions, half of which I didn't even know existed before, did not have the desired affect and in fact only made things worse.

What frightens all reasonable people is the fact that we see about us, in our own neighborhoods, some of the same factors which, existing in greater degree, made that object lesson actual.

Science proves that the literal translations can not be true (all of those animals could not fit in the ark)... But instead of those simpleton congregations admitting their beliefs are mistaken, they attack the science that exposes their misleading dogma and make ludicrous statments (dinosaurs didn't exist) when the fact is, science can not prove god does not exist.

If we look at just facts alone, make everything completely objective, then the simple answer is the god of the bible does not exist.

It makes no sense to me that there would be a omniscient, all - powerful being watching every move I make and judging all my actions, yet this supposedly loving being will consign me to eternal hell if I don't believe in him, regardless of the fact he's shown me no evidence he exists or cares about me or the millions of people he supposedly put here, many of whom are starving and dying.

Olson makes much, for example, of the fact that dispensationalism's popularity «does not exist despite its pessimism, it feeds off it.»

Even though it flatly contradicts astronomy, geology and biology, Morris attempts to defend a literal reading of his textbook on the facts of nature: «The Bible teaches that the earth existed before the stars, that it was initially covered by water, that plant life preceded the sun, that the first animals created were the whales, that birds were made before insects, that man was made before woman.»

Good diversity is the fact that different gifts and talents and personalities exist in the people in the Catholic Church, yet those people make use of their unique qualities within the unity of the truth that the Church safeguards.

As a NeoPagan — Polytheist, I routinely offer my thought - prayers to a pantheon of Deities... I have NO physical / other scientifically quantifiable «proof», as such, that any deity actually exists but I am left with the supposition / fact that IF a Deity / deities exist, it is more - than - conceivable that for whatever reason (s), such a deity might choose to make themselves remote from scientific / other investigative efforts!

Improved pedagogy and revised educational processes may make existing schooling function better educationally, but they will not of themselves make it more adequate to the facts of pluralism or to the need for unity.

He wrote it rather to point to a reality, a reality which is so real in the actual events that occurred that he needed only supply the connecting links in the spirit of the existing facts and sayings in order to make it complete.

The fact that melody does not exist at an instant does not make it unreal; on the contrary it shows the fictitious character of durationless instants.

(1 John 5:19) Knowledge of this fact makes it easier to understand why bad situations exist.

That such a tradition as Käsemann describes existed in the early Church is clear enough, and that these sayings are at home in it is shown both by their form, the two - part sentence with the same verb in each referring to present action and eschatological judgement respectively, and by the fact that a Christian prophet makes use of one of them in Rev. 3.5 b («I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels»).

Either way, the recipe originated here so it's every bit possible that a copy was made over there (either because Epicurious is running an excerpt from The Smitten Kitchen Cookbook, where this recipe also exists, as a promotional thing, or because one of their users submitted the recipe — which they would have done without my permission, which is a copyright infringement) but it doesn't change the fact that the recipe is copyrighted by Smitten Kitchen.

I adore the stuff, despite the fact that it pretty much doesn't exist in Australia, and so I keep forgetting to make it.

In fact, a closer look at Smiths career shows that he has made a healthy living off playing characters who battle things that do nt exist including Space Aliens, zombies, space aliens, his own sons acting abilties, iRobots, space aliens again, racism in golf, and the unrealistic expectations of upward economic mobility.

But unfortunately for you and your inferior opinions, that's not the case, Also, she said that she would fight Gina Carano at a higher weight even when that division didn't exist in the UFC, and those facts make your second paragraph moot...

I very much doubt that Real would pursue Sanchez unless they were contemplating moving Bale, planning to play Ronaldo centrally this season and willing to upset their delicate wage structure... of course anything is possible, but this appears to be unlikely... the bigger question is the fact that Wenger was willing to risk losing the first few games of the season because he hasn't settled the Sanchez dilemma in a timely fashion... no one believes he was too injured to play so this is not too dissimilar from the Liverpool game last season, except for the fact that Sanchez was in street clothes and not in his warm - ups (much like Coutinho for Liverpool today)... we're existing in such a fragile environment because of Wenger and Kroenke... in the game yesterday, when Leicester scored to make it 3 - 2, you could cut the tension with a knife... can you imagine just for a second what the reaction might have been if we had failed to score in the last 10 minutes