-LSB-...] We can create a better, happier, more just existence for everyone by nurturing the common good and respecting our interdependence, instead of always focusing on moving up one rung in
the existing hierarchical power -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
«Empowerment Voice» is exhibited in an actor possessing, at various degrees of capacity, an ability to command the institutional form and language of the
power structural arrangements in which the conflict arises, sufficient to effect long term distributive concessions, sometimes permanent, however, like Protest Voice, actors engaged in Empowerment Voice are unlikely to achieve reconstruction of the
power structural arrangements, instead they are more likely to engage in an effort to preserve the
existing power structural arrangement to maintain perceived socioeconomic advantage, or to be unable to identify how the
power structural arrangements might be reconstructed in a way that does not perpetuate the underlying source of conflict, namely the imbalances of inclusion and equity resulting from the hyper - segregated
hierarchical power regime.
This maturation in conflict voice enables the actors to mutually reach contrition and forgiveness, by which capacity the actors are enabled to pursue the consensus goal of transforming the
existing hyper - segregated
hierarchical power regime, which defines their respective institutionalized
power positions outside the mediation process, to sustainable democratized
power structural arrangements embodying institutionalized inclusion and equity.
This spatial
power relationship is generally observed as
existing within a hyper - segregated
hierarchical power regime, characterized by socioeconomic divisions defined by class categories or tribal based constructs, manifesting along bloodlines, ethnicity, race, religion, political identity, language, and cultural traits.
The achievement of the deconstruction of the
existing hyper - segregated
hierarchical power regime, and therein the transformation of the
existing power structural arrangements, results in the institutionalization of mediation processes within the new democratic
power structural arrangements, which in turn ensures that future conflicts among the actors do not reach impasse or rise to a level that threatens the broader society in which the actors reside.