These ideals seem to be more fed by peer - group comparisons than by comparing oneself to
the existing ideals of beauty.
Not exact matches
In an essay on Heinecken written in 1976, abstract photographer and colleague Carl Chiarenza wrote: «He uses
existing photographs... and their reproductions because they have littered the world and our minds with unlimited examples
of every conceivable image
of truth,
beauty, banality, eroticism, brutality, pornography, consumerism, political idea, personality, idol, and
ideal.
Since it has no reference to objects that
exist, or to
ideal objects, such as circles and squares, his work must be considered from the point
of view
of expression through the integration
of rhythm, color and design, which he feels
beauty is composed
of.
«When I think
of beauty being dark, you think
of people, and women, so to speak, around the world, who are constantly augmenting and adjusting themselves for an
ideal that does not
exist.»
Another
beauty is that our profession
exists to be a reflection
of society's
ideals.