Sentences with phrase «existing laws in the country»

Despite existing laws in the country such as the Milk Code which prohibits the promotion of breastmilk substitutes, the culture of breastfeeding is still not ingrained in families.

Adegboruwa also pointed out that though the Ekiti lawmakers and the governor had a good intention, the new law was unnecessary as, according to him, there were already existing laws in the country that criminalise unathourised use of weapon and murder.

As per the existing laws in the country, all the investors and traders have to...

Not exact matches

Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments of the aerospace industry, levels of air travel, financial condition of commercial airlines, the impact of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization of the anticipated benefits of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope of future repurchases of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level of other investing activities and uses of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits of diversification and balance of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact of the negotiation of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect of changes in U.S. trade policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017), environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence of events that may give rise to a right of one or both of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects of the announcement or the completion of the merger on the market price of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.

Canada's regulatory system and securities laws, however, are not a real factor in why such a large difference exists between the two countries response to equity crowdfunding.

Far more extensive change to marriage laws would be necessary to allow polygamy — in no other country where equal marriage for gay people exists has this come up.

Does the «right» to free speech exist anywhere in the laws governing the country where the attacks occurred?

n 1797, the United States Senate ratified a treaty with Tripoli that stated in Article 11: As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.

«As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.»

Atheist believe in nothing but they still exist, Most Atheist believe in Global Warming, Our EPA regulations, laws are higher than any other country, just implement's the laws on the books and we will be fine.

«As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.»

«As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.»

That sort of law does exist in some countries, although I would not agree with your proposition that most countries have it, because those sorts of laws have been repealed in a number of countries in recent years.»

Animals are exported to countries where laws do not protect them from extreme cruelty and in some cases, where no animal protection laws exist at all.

In addition to bringing in new laws or other regulatory measures where none exist, legislation in many countries needs to be amended to include World Health Assembly Resolutions on infant and young child nutritioIn addition to bringing in new laws or other regulatory measures where none exist, legislation in many countries needs to be amended to include World Health Assembly Resolutions on infant and young child nutritioin new laws or other regulatory measures where none exist, legislation in many countries needs to be amended to include World Health Assembly Resolutions on infant and young child nutritioin many countries needs to be amended to include World Health Assembly Resolutions on infant and young child nutrition.

Compulsory education laws exist not only in the United States, but in many other countries.

WHO recognizes ongoing progress being made in various countries since 2011, in terms of passing laws, strengthening existing laws or improving monitoring mechanisms.

The problem we have in this country is implementation of our existing laws, because none of these people have been prosecuted by states before that is why they keep doing it.

Many of the children appearing in New York courtrooms have legal recourse to stay in the country under existing law, due to the dangers they faced at home, Mr. Annobil said.

While Lord West's review has found no systematic failings in our procedures for checking potential suspects, it has highlighted the importance of enhancing existing cooperation to share more information between police and immigration services and internationally across countries: - within the EU to enable British law enforcement authorities to access immigration information on existing EU databases; - bilaterally with other member states to mutually exchange information; - and joining up criminal records databases throughout the EU so that our authorities can quickly identify individuals charged with crimes, no matter where in Europe they are convicted.

To be fair, if those laws didn't exist every quack in the country would claim that they could cure cancer with a variety of non-effective treatments and many people would die unnecessarily (although many people are being injured from conventional therapies).

But the laws governing school facilities were written a century or more before charters existed, when there was only one kind of «public school» in this country.

What needs to happen to make sure that laws and policies do not reinforce existing inequality in our country and in our communities?

When we demanded an explanation, we were told that the meetings were held to develop changes to the existing Pennsylvania Charter School Law that State Auditor - Gener DePasquale called one of the worst in the country.

The court systems in this country exist so that all people can be assured that their rights are protected — which means that courts are always opening new cases to explore new aspects of the law.

In most countries cryptocurrencies are not recognised as legal tender and are only regulated to the extent that they fit within existing laws, such as tax laws.

Hatley argues that «existing laws could be effective in discouraging the use of TNR and cat colonies as a way to attempt to manage the free - roaming cat population in this country.»

In fact, existing laws and regulations mandate a safe procedure for importing animals and preventing rabies and exotic diseases from entering the country.

Speak to your veterinarian or local authority to establish what laws exist in your country with regards to the rabies vaccine.

Properly applied, these existing laws could be effective in discouraging the use of TNR and cat colonies as a way to attempt to manage the free - roaming cat population in this country.

And so under this existing binding international law, nations have the ability to make choices that make sense for them on how they will keep their GHG emissions at levels that in combination with the GHG emissions of other countries will prevent dangerous climate change.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

They need an excuse to override any country's existing laws and constitutions, such as ours, all in the name of some great pending catastrophe.

For example, ECO could use the «freedom of information» laws that exist in many countries to locate theinformation and submit it to the UNFCCC, as a courtesy to transparency and the «V» in MRV.

@AdamZerner: Yes, the protection [which exists in common law countries only] explicitly extends to sworn testimony (more so than in other circumstances, but let's not get into that).

At first sight, this seemed a done deal, given the CJEU's existing case - law holding dividend withholding taxes contrary to that provision in the event comparable domestic situations were exempted from such a tax, as cases like C ‑ 379 / 05 Amurta (from one Member State to another), [4] C ‑ 521 / 07 Commission v. Netherlands [5](from a Member State to EEA - countries [6]-RRB-, C ‑ 190 / 12 Emerging Markets Series of DFA Investment Trust Company (from a Member State to third countries) show.

All common law systems that exist today are descendants of that medieval system, and so often, but not always, principles that apply in one common law country will apply in another.

The law provides a framework for the United States to enter into bilateral agreements with other countries in relation to how data can be demanded / shared, but it also provides additional rules in absence of the bilateral agreements (none of which exist at this time).

This would be a means of recognizing in our most fundamental law that Quebec existed in our country as a distinctive part of it with unique needs in such matters as language and culture and that courts would need to take the existence of this «distinct society» into account when analyzing provisions under constitutional challenge.

In principle, in a civil law country there exists a definitive code of laws that can be examined to determine the legal consequences of any given actioIn principle, in a civil law country there exists a definitive code of laws that can be examined to determine the legal consequences of any given actioin a civil law country there exists a definitive code of laws that can be examined to determine the legal consequences of any given action.

Additionally, the provincial and municipal governments across the country have a large role to play as they have been explicitly given authority by the federal government to fill in some of the legislative holes (e.g. as the law will relate to retail and distribution) or to alter some of the existing baselines set out by the Cannabis Act (e.g. the minimum age for purchase and consumption).

While animal rights as such are still not recognized under the law, animal welfare laws, notably those against cruelty, do exist in Canada and other countries — a clear indication that animals are not considered «mere» chattels anymore.

It can be argued that for the EU, a specific obligation of international law existed in the context of the WTO, to the extent that the Doha Article I Waiver, granted to the EU by the Ministerial Council in 2001, expressly bound the EU to reach a mutually agreed solution on imports from MFN countries.

The oldest English law firms have existed for longer than any of the political parties in this country, longer than virtually all of the modern states in the developed world, never mind the mayflies of the business world.

I don't think there's much of a difference in how people approach legal hacking from country to country because issues like access to justice, the integration of technology into law practice, and the relationship between existing laws and emerging technologies are all global issues.

However, the court would review the following four issues if challenged by the respondent: (1) whether the foreign court lacks jurisdiction pursuant to Taiwanese laws; (2) whether a default judgment is rendered against the losing defendant, but the notice or summons of the initiation of action had been legally served in a reasonable time in the foreign country or had been served through judicial assistance provided under the Taiwanese laws; (3) whether the performance ordered by such judgment or its litigation procedure is against Taiwanese public policy or morals; and (4) whether there exists no mutual recognition between the foreign country and Taiwan.

And, the hearsay rule does not exist in civil law countries.

Insofar as section 15 (2) of the policy permits disclosures that might be permitted under American ethics rules but are not permitted under Canadian ethics rules, the proposed policy risks conflict with the existing law governing lawyers in our country and could create a messy situation for lawyers trying to determine how to conduct themselves in accordance with the law.

Democratic procedures exist primarily in order to ensure that the Parliament which makes those laws includes members of Parliament who are chosen by the people of this country and are accountable to them.