Improved budgeting and forecasting processes significantly reducing
existing modeling errors and turnaround by one week.
Not exact matches
A new method developed by scientists on the Florida campus of The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) takes another tack entirely, combining
existing formulas in a kind of algorithmic stew to gain a better picture of molecular structural diversity that is then used to eliminate
errors and improve the final
model.
Errors may
exist in data acquired from third - party vendors, the construction of
model portfolios and in coding related to the
His
error, however, is in suggesting that this discovery (with limited understanding of its magnitude) somehow throws into doubt
existing models of AGW (which are based on much more firmly established physical processes with trends in different climate forcings that are directly testable against the historical temperature record).
Only one of the parties involved has (1) had their claims fail scientific peer - review, (2) produced a reconstruction that is completely at odds with all other
existing estimates (note that there is no sign of the anomalous 15th century warmth claimed by MM in any of the roughly dozen other
model and proxy - based estimates shown here), and (3) been established to have made egregious elementary
errors in other published work that render the work thoroughly invalid.
In addition to «
modeling errors,» much of the Clack critique is aimed at the assumed ubiquitous deployment of technologies that either don't yet
exist or are only lightly tested and can't be scaled up to the huge scales envisioned.
One might (or might not) argue for such a relation if the
models were empirically adequate, but given nonlinear
models with large systematic
errors under current conditions, no connection has been even remotely established for relating the distribution of
model states under altered conditions to decision - relevant probability distributions... There may well
exist thresholds, or tipping points (Kemp 2005), which lie within this range of uncertainty.
Previously reported discrepancies between the amount of warming near the surface and higher in the atmosphere have been used to challenge the reliability of climate
models and the reality of human - induced global warming... This significant discrepancy no longer
exists because
errors in the satellite and radiosonde data have been identified and corrected.
General Introduction Two Main Goals Identifying Patterns in Time Series Data Systematic pattern and random noise Two general aspects of time series patterns Trend Analysis Analysis of Seasonality ARIMA (Box & Jenkins) and Autocorrelations General Introduction Two Common Processes ARIMA Methodology Identification Phase Parameter Estimation Evaluation of the
Model Interrupted Time Series Exponential Smoothing General Introduction Simple Exponential Smoothing Choosing the Best Value for Parameter a (alpha) Indices of Lack of Fit (
Error) Seasonal and Non-seasonal
Models With or Without Trend Seasonal Decomposition (Census I) General Introduction Computations X-11 Census method II seasonal adjustment Seasonal Adjustment: Basic Ideas and Terms The Census II Method Results Tables Computed by the X-11 Method Specific Description of all Results Tables Computed by the X-11 Method Distributed Lags Analysis General Purpose General
Model Almon Distributed Lag Single Spectrum (Fourier) Analysis Cross-spectrum Analysis General Introduction Basic Notation and Principles Results for Each Variable The Cross-periodogram, Cross-density, Quadrature - density, and Cross-amplitude Squared Coherency, Gain, and Phase Shift How the Example Data were Created Spectrum Analysis — Basic Notations and Principles Frequency and Period The General Structural
Model A Simple Example Periodogram The Problem of Leakage Padding the Time Series Tapering Data Windows and Spectral Density Estimates Preparing the Data for Analysis Results when no Periodicity in the Series
Exists Fast Fourier Transformations General Introduction Computation of FFT in Time Series
Because the full suite of physical processes at the grounding line (e.g., Walker et al., 2013) in general is not represented in modern
models, the possibility
exists that rates produced by extant
models under strong simulated forcing may be greatly in
error (Nowicki et al., 2013).
One is related to the systematic
errors that are known to
exist in
models.
The potential
exists for spurious numerical dispersion, when combined with
errors in parametrizations and incompletely
modelled processes, to produce erroneous entropy sources.