Sentences with phrase «exists as a concept»

Somebody should tell «Christians» who usually know absolutely nothing about the Bible, that one man, one woman marriage based on love didn't exist as a concept until the 20th - century.

So it still exists as a concept, that's not what I want to hear.

When we launched in June 2016, very few people we spoke to had any idea that document automation existed as a concept.

Not exact matches

Some of the concepts will piggyback off of existing TV brands such as House Hunters or Chopped, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Quickflix and DVD Direct have concentrated their marketing online, targeting existing Internet users, but both companies say they are pleased by Telstra's entry into the market, as it will increase awareness of the business concept.

Aristotle's First Principle Thinking is also an essential element of approaching the world as a Quantum Leader because both concepts share the presumption that all possibilities exist, including those yet to be imagined.

This is not a new concept as there have been speed, information and skill advantages since markets have existed.

The company's large existing services business includes breakthroughs in the concept and delivery of modular services, as well as expertise in infrastructure consulting and software - as - a-service.

Self - directing buyers will radically change the concepts of messaging as we know it and call into question the relevance of existing messaging tactics with buyers - who are more knowledgeable than ever before.

Spinoza'a concept of God as with Einsteins seems to fit your view (with the exception their view sees the observable as divine) «complete law and order in a world which objectively exists».

Blessed are the Cheesemakers You are doing it again, arguing your concept of god against God who in fact exists in form and substance as expressed.

However, it does not exist based on all evidence and there is no such thing as non existence in substance or concept

Or that such a thing as your concept of Objective Morality actually exists.

The language simply does not exist for you, as a sighted person, to explain to a blind person the concept of «color,» much less specific colors.

But if that concept is never introduced as a young child and / or you're casually told that they don't exist and keep the mindset into adulthood, do you fit into one of the study's categories?

The Christian concept took Sheol as ceasing to exist on earth but you are resurrected to be punished in Gehenna or resurrected to Paradise to be rewarded.

Dante's concept of «monarchy» (synonymous with «empire») as a current possibility, however, exists only as an ideal.

The human being, has been expropriated of his basic rights: as a «human resource», he / she only has the right to exist as a function of profitability and of what is now known as «employability», a concept which has replaced that of the «right to work».

Here then is a theology that either means nothing certainly identifiable (without supernatural grace or high genius in the art of reconnecting with experience concepts carefully divested of relation to it) or else means that the world might exactly as well not have existed, or as well have existed with far more evil or less good in it than it actually presents.

But insofar as in this boundary - concept becoming is thought of as lacking all determination (although in the concrete there exists only a determinate becoming), it is, in its relation to form, just as radically to be thought of as potency, as Aristotelian «primary matter.»

Because those concepts» goals, like Christianity, do not include absolute non-violence as a result of existing.

Whatever doubts may exist about the sources of this democracy, there can be none about the chief source of the morality that gives it life and substance... [From the Hebrew tradition, via the Puritans, come] the contract and all its corollaries; the higher law as something more than a «brooding omnipresence in the sky»; the concept of the competent and responsible individual; certain key ingredients of economic individualism; the insistence on a citizenry educated to understand its rights and duties; and the middle - class virtues, that high plateau of moral stability on which, so Americans believe, successful democracy must always build [Seedtime of the Republic (Harcourt, Brace, 1953, p. 55)-RSB-.

I can accept the notion that a God just exist, and if those want to play on that concept we can take it even further and say why could God not have come out of a Big Bang as well.

I do believe that God created concept and the idea to have a Heaven and Earth by granting everything to have free will and set everything in motion as he allowed time to do so, because I think without time nothing that we know it really exist, and Carbon Datings would say otherwise.

If someone were to approach you today and propose the concept of religion as it has existed throughout human history, you'd laugh at them for having such a silly idea.

By «metaphysics in the strict sense,» one properly means metaphysica generalis, or ontology, although from the standpoint of a neoclassical theism there can be no adequate distinction between ontology, on the one hand, and theology and cosmology, as disciplines of metaphysica specialis, on the other.1 From this standpoint, ontology is also theology in the sense that its constitutive concept «reality as such» necessarily involves the distinction / correlation between the one necessarily existing individual and the many contingently existing individuals and events.

My favorite way of explaining it is that the concept of God as a Trinity makes about as much sense as a triangle existing in one dimension.

Before that time there existed Anglo - saxons and Germans, French and Normans, Italians and Danes: but during the Crusades the new concept of «Western civilisation», a cause common to all European nations alike, was created; and it was the hatred of Islam that stood as godfather behind the new creation... http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shiatalk/message/30296

Recently, while chatting with an old friend who happens to be a professor of New Testament and biblical Studies at a prominent Christian university, I asked him what he thought of the concept of «Christian Privilege» and whether or not he felt as if it existed in practicality.

Inequality will still exist so long as we keep religious / philosophical concepts of marriage alive in our laws.

This is not the place to show that this concept of freedom either exists explicitly in the creed of the Church or is implied by the teaching of Christianity, that free faith justifies, that salvation must be received from God in freedom and that the eternity of salvation is not an indefinite continuation of time but must be understood as the final result of history itself which is produced by freedom.

It can not be said that this particular interpretation of the general Christian philosophical doctrine that all that exists whether material or spiritual, must be brought under the same concept of being and conceived as subject to the same metaphysical norms, is the interpretation favoured by all philosophical schools.

It may be that, as Carl von Weiszaecker (1968) has boldly suggested, since the concept of a particle itself is just the description of a connection which exists between phenomena, there may, if we are prepared to jump into strict metaphysical language, be no reason why what we call «matter» should not in fact be «spirit.»

What IS, is and as much as we covetously cling to our mental concepts, one truth exists and we can not know it until we pass from this realm.

In other words, God as the Unsurpassable One can not fail to exist, or the nonexistence of the Unsurpassable One is a selfcontradictory concept.

Omnipotence and denial of ones exists seems contradictory, as does «fully man and fully god», as does some concepts of «trinity».

Are the facts that the «real» science of aerodynamics, math, and music exists fundamentally as non-sensory, unlimited invisible mental concepts lost upon you?

So im confused as to why the final resolve is always «prove god exists, and ill believe it» when in fact, the very concept of this proof is that it falls apart, and does nt make it true.

For the modern problem really lies in the fact that so many Enlightenment thinkers relied on a concept of «natural» that was anything but a reflection of human nature as it actually exists.

Yet the law does not exist in a vacuum, and the degeneration of legal terminology occurs at the same time as the broader breakdown of concepts in culture.

This vacuum you speak of exists in my mind as a gravimetric concept wherein not unlike a magnet a black hole of the major types pull with such veraciousness all matter within its gravimetric reach.

In this respect, the existence of the world, unlike that of the self, is strictly ultimate; and the concept of «the world,» understood as referring to the necessarily nonempty class of realities other than God, all of whose members exist or occur merely contingently, is strictly correlative with the concept of «God.»

Perhaps the reason we have to stretch to come up with Scriptures that support paying a pastor is because the concept of pastor as we know it did not exist in the first century, and the concept of paying elders was absent.

God exists, as a concept or theory, in the very least.

You also to realize religion is just a concept, as long as people exist there will be violence and destruction.

The persuasiveness of religious programs toward change appear to be greatest when they are viewed by a person who is in a state of attitude imbalance or transition and seeking new forms of gratification for his or her needs; when they are viewed by a person for whom religious faith has always been a viable, if not vital, option; when the options being presented are seen as realistic and leading to a desirable end; when opportunity for demonstration exists in proximate distance to the viewing situation; and when the attitude or behavior is not central to the individual's self - concept and ego - functioning.

If it does exist, a skeptic may, if he wishes, argue that still there is no method whereby we may compare it with our concept of it; this position seems forceful and could, it seems, be met only by a pragmatic theory of knowledge, such as what emerges in Process and Reality (PR 275).

The role of this concept in shaping positive legislation as well as in criticism of existing laws will be immediately apparent.

In searching for a worthy response, Rollins says he is drawn to Christian mystics like Meister Ekhart, «for while they did not embrace total silence, they balked at the presumption of those who would seek to colonize the name «God» with concepts... By speaking with wounded words of their wounded Christ, these mystics helped to develop, not a distinct religious tradition, but rather a way of engaging with and understanding already existing religious traditions: seeing them as a loving response to God rather than a way of defining God.»

As Corporate Executive Chef for The Light Group, Chef Massie's responsibilities include concept development and menu design, hiring and training the staff, and recipe development for both new and existing Light Group restaurants.