With respect to the first question, the Court will generally perform an analysis based on whether an analogous relationship or category
exists as between the parties.
Not exact matches
If regulators recognize (and put out clear guidance) on the distinction
between tokens that have passive income streams associated which rely solely on the work of highly centralized
parties as security tokens and tokens that give holders the right to use an
existing digital service or contribute work to an
existing decentralized organization
as non-security tokens, the democratization of ownership of non-security assets will continue.
n 1797, the United States Senate ratified a treaty with Tripoli that stated in Article 11:
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony
existing between the two countries.
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, —
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen, — and
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countrie
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony
existing between the two countries.
As events at this summer's Republican National Convention in San Diego show, the putative alliance
between the religious right and the Republican
Party offers little solution; and the truth is that grave dangers exist regardless when the independence of a religious mission is married to a particular political party's ag
Party offers little solution; and the truth is that grave dangers
exist regardless when the independence of a religious mission is married to a particular political
party's ag
party's agenda.
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony
existing between the two countries.»
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, — as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, —
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims], — and
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan [Muslim] nation, it is declared by the
parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony
existing between the two countries.»
«
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion;
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and, as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen; and,
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.&raqu
as the said States never entered into any war, or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the
parties, that no pretext arising from religious opinions, shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony
existing between the two countries.»
Ideologically, there had already
existed an affinity
between conservatism and anti-abortionism, but
as Ziegler shows, these social currents strengthened and deepened the bond
between the Republican
party and the pro-life movement.
More additions are expected and so perhaps that will ease any tension that still
exists between the two
parties, but until Conte puts pen to paper, it seems
as though this story will continue to run.
«We continue to stand firmly in that posture
as we seek a coalition under similar terms
as have
existed between the IDC and Senate Republicans, and are willing to enter a coalition consistent with the recent correspondence from state Democratic
party officials.
In 2013, NPR's Allan Greenblatt listed a few: It's effectively a one -
party state, with the Democrats so dominant that there is no political competition and machine politics set the agenda; the elections are expensive, making candidates reliant on donors; many key decisions, such
as the shape of the state budget, are made in backroom deals
between a few power players; the local media is so focused on national events that it ignores what's happening in the state (especially upstate); and there's no anti-corruption movement to challenge the
existing culture.
Someone in an
existing county
party office (typically a county chairperson) would typically be the chief liaison
between the two on the local
party side, with a campaign manager or candidate
as the chief liaison on the candidate side.
In the immediate post-war period, even before the creation of the West - German state, allied military governors used the license system to prevent divisions
between parties and especially encourage the creation of a large Christian - Democrat political
party (
as opposed to the separate catholic and protestant
parties that
existed during the Weimar period).
He also labelled the current government
as a «super-incompetent» regime under which Ghanaians, according to him, are experiencing a level of hard times worse than the living conditions the New Patriotic
Party (NPP) had claimed
existed when he was in charge
as President
between 2012 and 2016.
«We continue to stand firmly in that posture
as we seek a coalition under similar terms
as have
existed between the IDC and Senate Republicans, and are willing to enter a coalition consistent with the recent correspondence from state Democratic
party officials,» she said.
«We continue to stand firmly in that posture
as we seek a coalition under similar terms
as have
existed between the IDC and Senate Republicans, and are willing to enter a coalition consistent with the recent correspondence from state Democratic
party officials,» she stated.
The possibility of combination of
party lists for elections
existed in the Dutch electoral system
between 1973 and June 2017
as a weak form of electoral alliance
between two
parties.
Another heated rivalry
exists between Luigi and Waluigi, with the two sharing bad chemistry in all the games they appear in together, and acting hostile and rude towards each other, such
as Luigi making a gesture at Waluigi to anger him in Mario Tennis, the two scowling at each other in the Mario
Party 3 group picture, and Waluigi's vandalism of Luigi's picture in the opening movie of Mario Power Tennis.
Special education teachers who served
as education evaluators during the 2002 - 2003 school year (or were on leave or sabbatical during that year) will have a preference for this assignment in each year that it
exists, in whatever form that it
exists,
as more fully set forth in the Memorandum of Agreement
between the
parties dated October 28, 2003, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Following months of negotiations
between the TIFIA JPO and the Borrower, the
parties executed two new TIFIA loans on November 6, 2013 which refinanced all of the exiting LA - 1 debt
as follows: (i) issue a $ 78 million TIFIA loan at the rural rate of one - half the 30 - year US Treasury rate to refinance the
existing 2005 TIFIA Loan; (ii) issue an additional $ 44 million TIFIA loan at the full 30 - year US Treasury rate to refinance a portion of the senior debt.
Another heated rivalry
exists between Luigi and Waluigi, with the two sharing bad chemistry in all the games they appear in together, and acting hostile and rude towards each other, such
as Luigi making a gesture at Waluigi to anger him in Mario Tennis, the two scowling at each other in the Mario
Party 3 group picture, and Waluigi's vandalism of Luigi's picture in the opening movie of Mario Power Tennis.
There have been a lot of crazy things written about the shutdown, but what makes this exceptional is that it serves
as a good example of how wide a gap
exists between the two
parties when it comes to certain environmental regulations.
Saarc
as a group had
existed and represented these countries during the three Conference of the
Parties (COP)
between 2010 - 12, but it went into cold storage specifically when India had become more active within another group — BASIC — along with Brazil, South Africa and China virtually at the cost of south Asian group.
As part of Work Stream Two,
Parties are looking for creative ways to make significant progress in reducing the 8 - 13 gigaton gap that
exists between the greenhouse gas emissions that
Parties have pledged to reduce and what is necessary to keep temperatures below a 2.0 °C increase in world temperatures.
Other factual aspects that often help this exercise work more effectively include aspects such
as an
existing relationship
between the
parties and / or a desire to develop or continue a relationship; a situation in which an apology could realistically help a
party come to terms with a harm; a situation in which one or both
parties wish to limit publicity; and a situation where one or both
parties are concerned about litigation costs.113
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents
as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship
between the child and the other parent,
as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's
existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other
party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred
between the parents or
between a parent and another individual or
between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors
as the court considers necessary.
In assessing whether there was a duty of care owed to Livent in relation to the Comfort Letter, the Supreme Court observed that «[t] he mere fact that proximity has been recognized
as existing between an auditor and its client for one purpose is insufficient to conclude that proximity
exists between the same
parties for all purposes.»
The president went so far
as to say that: «We would encourage tribunals to henceforth only make «split awards»
between such respondents (
as regards the same injury or loss) if such an order is positively sought by one of the
parties and if it is clearly demonstrated what proper legal basis (ie something other than CLIA 1978)
exists...»
Decision - Maker The Court may appoint a Decision - maker with binding authority to resolve disputes
between the
parties as to implementation or clarification of
existing orders concerning the
parties» minor or dependent children.
To recap the test for litigation privilege
as set out in Three Rivers District Council and others - v - Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 5)[2003] EWCA Civ 474 by the Court of Appeal, is that communications
between parties or their solicitors and third
parties for the purpose of obtaining information or advice in connection with
existing or contemplated litigation qualify for litigation privilege if, at the time of the communication in question, the following conditions are satisfied:
As confidence in the independence and impartiality of experts plays an important role when evaluating the competing and finely balanced judgements of rival experts, it is scrupulous that any potential or existing conflicts between an expert and the party instructing it are disclosed as early as possibl
As confidence in the independence and impartiality of experts plays an important role when evaluating the competing and finely balanced judgements of rival experts, it is scrupulous that any potential or
existing conflicts
between an expert and the
party instructing it are disclosed
as early as possibl
as early
as possibl
as possible.
He also found considerable privacy and safety differences
existed between being a
party and providing testimony
as a witness in an action.
There is a need to build and strengthen relationships
between parties separate from the particular transaction that first brings them together and to ensure that relationships
exist at an organisational,
as well
as an interpersonal level.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the child; (3) the preferences of each child; (4) the wishes of the parents
as to custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the child with each parent, the child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly affect the best interest of the child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent child relationship
between the child and the other parent,
as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the child; (10) the child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the child's
existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other
party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of custody unless the proposed custodial arrangement is not in the best interest of the child; (13) the child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the child or a sibling of the child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or child abuse or the effect on the child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred
between the parents or
between a parent and another individual or
between the parent and the child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors
as the court considers necessary
A domestic relations decision maker is given binding authority to resolve disputes
between the
parties as to the implementation or clarification of
existing orders regarding the
parties» children, including but not limited to: disputes concerning parenting time; specific decisions regarding a child like medical care or schooling; and child support.
Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact
exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third
party beneficiary of lease agreement
between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification
between the
parties and did not expressly set forth that one
party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable issues of fact
exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the
parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the
parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized
Suburban REALTORS Alliance Position The Alliance is opposed to increases in the current transfer tax for the following reasons: 1)
As the transfer tax is levied only on buyers and sellers of property, the burden per taxpayer is greater than the burden from a more broad - based tax designed to generate the same amount of revenue; 2) Since public transportation is a benefit that is open to all members of society, the charge should not be placed solely on buyers and sellers of property; 3) The transfer tax adds additional burdens on first - time home buyers saving for a down - payment and covering the closing costs and runs contrary to
existing federal, state, and local programs including the mortgage interest deduction, low interest property maintenance loans, and grants to first time homebuyers; 4) A real estate transfer tax is a state and local tax assessed on real property when ownership of the property is exchanged
between parties.