They also show that, even if we just hope to keep the increase below four degrees, then we canâ $ ™ t allow any expansion of the tar sands, and certainly no new pipelines such as Keystone and Northern Gateway to support
any expanded use of fossil fuels.
While older GOPers — Gen X and baby boomers — are unlikely to say that climate change is having an effect on the U.S., and are likely to support
the expanded use of fossil fuels, their younger counterparts largely disagree.
Yet governments and industry are rushing into
expanded use of fossil fuels, including unconventional fossil fuels such as tar sands, tar shale, shale gas extracted by hydrofracking, and methane hydrates.
As the planet has continued to
expand its use of fossil fuel and bring a Western lifestyle to all, the collateral damage has accumulated.
It's pretty clear from the 1940s onwards cooling that pollution from
the expanding use of fossil fuels was temporarily overwhelming the global warming from their use until we started cleaning up the smoke stacks - not that I'm suggesting that a solution to global warming should involve us choking ourselves with a lot of smoke again!
After noting that many countries planned to
expand their use of fossil fuels, the ONA considered likely political responses to global warming.
In fact, he wants to
expand the use of fossil fuel.
The United States is in fact headed in the completely wrong direction on fossil fuels — pledging to revive the coal industry and pursuing multiple strategies to
expand use of fossil fuels at home and abroad.
Not exact matches
«We are working closely with the CleanTech Alliance Fund team to build U.S. infrastructure that will reduce our dependence on
fossil fuels,
expand the
use of renewable energy and recycled materials, and improve the efficiency
of our economy,» said Scott Brown, Managing Partner
of the Fund.
The message: Cuomo is fully on board with those environmentalists who seek to block any project involving any
use or
expanded access to
fossil fuels of any kind, at any time, in any place in New York State.
And it also means that he has to stop supporting the
use of fossil fuels, including his idea to spend perhaps a hundred million dollars to
expand the gas plant that is heating the Empire State Plaza and lock in gas emissions into a low - income people -
of - color community for the next 30 years in the Arbor Hill area.»
In other words, to get away from
fossil fuels requires not just
expanding alternatives but also discouraging the
use of coal, oil and natural gas.
And even as the developed nations
of the world cut back on
fossil fuel use, there will be no justifiable way to prevent the Third World from
expanding its
use of coal and oil.
Quantitative analyses show that the risks associated with the
expanded use of nuclear energy are orders
of magnitude smaller than the risks associated with
fossil fuels.
... [E] ven as the developed nations
of the world cut back on
fossil fuel use, there will be no justifiable way to prevent the Third World from
expanding its
use of coal and oil.
And even as the developed nations
of the world cut back on
fossil fuel use, there will be no justifiable way to prevent the Third World from
expanding its
use of coal and oil.
Justin Gillis has written a news article putting the paper in context with other recent research on Antarctic dynamics and sea level, as well as with policy debates about the current value
of fossil fuels against the momentous costs that could attend greatly
expanded use:
Unfortunately, the only proven routes up from poverty involve an
expanded use of energy and, consequently, a seemingly inevitable increase in
fossil fuel use and thus carbon emissions.
It is rapidly
expanding energy
use, mainly driven by
fossil fuels, that explains why humanity is on the verge
of breaching planetary sustainability boundaries through global warming, biodiversity loss, and disturbance
of the nitrogen - cycle balance and other measures
of the sustainability
of the earth's ecosystem.
It
expanded extraction
using hydrofracturing in tar sands to increase activity in offshore oil drilling all over the world, thereby maximizing its rate
of fossil fuel extraction and processing.
Life on land:
Expanding renewable energies and clean electricity further reduces the
use of fossil fuels.
A taste
of them can be found at Cato's HumanProgress.org website and a compelling case for why we should continue to embrace and
expand fossil fuel use is made by Alex Epstein of the Center for Industrial Progress in his excellent (and very soon forthcoming) book The Moral Case for Fossil
fossil fuel use is made by Alex Epstein
of the Center for Industrial Progress in his excellent (and very soon forthcoming) book The Moral Case for
Fossil Fossil Fuels.
This activity report covers GEF's work in helping developing countries
expand their
use of clean energy and reduce their consumption
of fossil fuel.
But here's what the UNEP says rich and poor countries should focus on: Rich countries should spend their efforts to slash their
use of fossil fuels to avert carbon emissions (rapidly rising nations such as China, India and Brazil should focus on this as well), while poorer nations should spend at least one percent
of GDP on
expanding access to clean water and improving sanitation for the poor.
There Are Better Ways Forward Than Fracked Natural Gas My take on this is fairly simple: There are simply better ways to invest in our energy infrastructure as we transition away from
fossil fuels than
expanding the
use of fracked natural gas.
Even today, they continue to explore for new and increasingly more carbon - polluting sources
of fossil fuels, encouraging the
expanded use of the products that they know to be responsible for disruptive climate change.
By failing to support the goal
of a transition to low emissions he shows he is incapable
of providing any truly compelling reason to greatly
expand the
use of nuclear power and especially for
using it to replace
fossil fuels, ie his arguments look like one part
of a broader anti-environmentalist, anti-renewables agenda, one that will not admit the full and true costs
of the supposedly cheap and 100 % reliable, mostly
fossil fuel based legacy electricity systems.