Sentences with phrase «expectant management»

Once you have a strong understanding of normal physiology, you will dig deeper into the concepts of active and expectant management of labor, and common routine interventions.

One study reported that waiting up to 24 hours, known as expectant management, didn't increase the risk of complications as long as mom and baby didn't have an infection.

The discussion of induction is induction vs. expectant management at whatever gestation you're looking at for whatever reason you're looking at it.

Similarly, in another large cohort, the rate of VBAC was higher among women undergoing induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management (73.8 % versus 61.3 %, P <.001)(104).

A new randomized control trial is underway seeking to evaluate outcomes of induction verses expectant management of pregnancy.

If your baby has low levels of bilirubin treatment is usually just expectant management, or watching your baby.

In addition to greater expectant management of the second stage, two other practices could potentially reduce cesarean deliveries in the second stage: 1) operative vaginal delivery and 2) manual rotation of the fetal occiput for malposition.

The researchers recommend that «Nulliparous [first baby] women should be made aware of this, as well as potential risks of expectant management during counselling.»

In a study presented today at the Society for Maternal - Fetal Medicine's (SMFM) annual meeting, The Pregnancy Meeting ™, researchers unveiled findings that suggest that induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation among healthy, first - time mothers reduces the rate of cesarean birth as compared to expectant management among the same population.

The research presented is part of, «A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management,» more commonly referred to as the ARRIVE Trial, which was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).

In hospital births — where the majority of people give birth in back - lying positions — we see a similar rate (15 %) of people with postpartum blood loss greater than 500 mL when expectant management (defined below) is used in the third stage of labor, and a rate of 5 % when active management is used (Begley et al. 2015).

One observational study comparing induction to expectant management in women with a prior cesarean delivery found that induction of labor was associated with a greater relative risk of uterine rupture, whereas another study did not (104, 105).

If you induce at 41 weeks, the proper comparator is expectant management at 41 weeks or even maybe induction at an earlier gestation, but not spontaneous labor at an earlier gestation because demonstrably that did not happen.

For example, data from retrospective observational cohort studies have shown that, when compared with expectant management, labor induction is associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery at 39 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.71 — 0.91), at 40 weeks of gestation (AOR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.66 — 0.79), and at 41 weeks of gestation (AOR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.62 — 0.79)(109).

Recent research supports this very idea that «women should be given information on the benefits and harms of both [active and expectant management of labour] to support informed choice» (Begley et al., 2011).

Until recently, a Cochrane review on «Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour» suggested that administration of synthetic oxytocin (Syntocinon ® or Syntometrine ®) is preferred to expectant management — or simply allowing the placenta time to peel away from the uterine lining and to be expelled.

This comparison is misleading because the actual clinical alternative to labor induction is not spontaneous labor (which may or may not occur) but expectant management.

590 patients received cervical pessaries while 590 had expectant management.

This too is in line with the natural conception rate reported from other trials, thus suggesting that «expectant management» (wait - and - see) may be a reasonable option in patients with unexplained infertility — though there is no strong evidence in its favour.

The cause of infertility in many couples — in some studies as many as one - third of all cases — can not be diagnosed or explained, and this group of patients still represents a real challenge to fertility clinics, with options ranging from wait - and - see («expectant management») to IVF.

Lower rates of respiratory support among newborns in the induction group (3 %) as compared to the expectant management group (4 %)

In a study with more than 6,100 pregnant women across the country, researchers randomly assigned half of the women to an expectant management group (waiting for labor to begin on its own and intervening only if problems occur) and the other half to a group that would undergo an elective induction (inducing labor without a medical reason) at 39 weeks of gestation.

Lower rates of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in the elective induction group (9 %) as compared to the expectant management group (14 %)

Lower rates of cesarean birth among the elective induction group (19 %) as compared to the expectant management group (22 %)

Abortion, Barrier Methods, Contraception, Emergency Contraception, Expectant Management, Implant, IUD, Manual Vacuum Aspiration, Medication Abortion, Medication Management, Miscarriage, Natural Family Planning, Patch, Permanent Methods, Pills, Progestin Injection, Ring, Uterine Aspiration

Expectant management, repeat misoprostol, or surgical intervention should be appropriately offered within the clinical context.

Abortion, Expectant Management, Manual Vacuum Aspiration, Medication Abortion, Medication Management, Miscarriage, Uterine Aspiration