When the correct adjustments to the data were applied the data matched much more closely the trends
expected by climate models.
The team's results «help us understand why Earth didn't warm as much as
expected by climate models in the past decade or so.»
Not exact matches
They also analyzed data from a
climate model developed
by the Max - Planck Institute for Meteorology in Germany to predict what the correlation between the current and rainfall would be
expected to be during the Little Ice Age.
«They are using this information to test state - of - the - art
climate models under conditions of high atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, similar to those
expected by the end of this century.»
Global
climate models find that rainfall in northeast Brazil is
expected to decrease in the coming decades, and some rivers could see flows reduced
by 60 to 70 percent, he said.
One positive finding of the ecological niche
modelling study is that while the ranges of many species are
expected to contract, much of the remaining suitable habitat for many species will be located within existing protected areas, and that the recent creation of new reserves such as Itombwe and Kabobo in the Democratic Republic of Congo, have greatly increased the protection of some species under threat
by future
climate change.
He and colleagues
expect the new information will propel
climate modelers to refine their
models to better predict what may happen in the future as soils are disturbed
by climate change.
Using
climate models to project into the future, the team found the amount of time increased temperatures are
expected to strip the air of moisture could up to double
by the 2080s.
Climate change
models predict that the Arctic sea ice will continue to shrink in a warming world (as much as 40 % of the ice is
expected to be gone
by midcentury), and the resulting changes — including later formation of ice in the autumn, rain falling on the snow, and decreasing snow depths — will make it increasingly difficult for the seals to construct their snow caves, NOAA says.
The major argument for that is that physically one would
expect that and detailed analysis
by climate models shows it.
Professor of Economics and Research Chair in Energy, Ecology and Prosperity at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy Dr. Ross McKitrick discusses the wide disparities between the
expected results of
climate models and real - life observations, during an in - depth interview for The New Criterion
by Ben Weingarten
«Also, if the atmosphere isn't accumulating heat at the rate forecast
by the
models, then the theoretical positive
climate feedbacks which were
expected to amplify the CO2 effect won't be as large,» McNider said.
The major argument for that is that physically one would
expect that and detailed analysis
by climate models shows it.
Raw
climate model results for a business - as - usual scenario indicate that we can
expect global temperatures to increase anywhere in the range of 5.8 and 10.6 degrees Fahrenheit (3.2 to 5.9 degrees Celsius) over preindustrial levels
by the end of the century — a difference of about a factor of two between the most - and least - severe projections.
Anyhow, not the point, the reason for the hand wringing is that what has happened in the last decade was not predicted, not
expected and todate can not be explained
by the processes and
models that were thought to be indicative of this planet's
climate.
If the
models are unable to predict the forced response of the
climate (i.e. the
climate change caused
by changes in forcings such as CO2) then I don't see how they can be
expected to accurately
model the unforced response (internal
climate variability).
Model projections for precipitation changes are less certain than those for temperature.12, 2 Under a higher emissions scenario (A2), global
climate models (GCMs) project average winter and spring precipitation
by late this century (2071 - 2099) to increase 10 % to 20 % relative to 1971 - 2000, while changes in summer and fall are not
expected to be larger than natural variations.
Actually supposing the
climate is somehow chaotic one perhaps shouldn't
expect a good fit from time - series
models driven
by gaussian noise.
The output of such
model simulations is then used
by the
climate impacts community to investigate what potential future benefits or threats could be
expected.
In this way, we can obtain the
expected range of projected
climate trends using the interannual statistics of the observed NAO record in combination with the
model's radiatively - forced response (given
by the ensemble - mean of the 40 simulations).
We find that the
expected 95 % range of future
climate trends induced
by NAO fluctuations estimated from the observed statistics of the NAO and the
modeled response to increased GHGs is largely similar to that obtained from the CESM - LE directly, attesting to the fidelity of the
model's representation of the NAO and the utility of this approach.
Yet, when scientists examine the empirical temperature measurement datasets, it becomes readily apparent that changes in CO2 levels are not generating the
expected changes in global temperatures, as predicted
by the immensely powerful and sophisticated (and incredibly costly)
climate models.
Hang on... we've been told for years
by apparent top
climate scientists to
expect less snowfalls,
climate models predict warmer winters, ex-politicians claiming ice - free polar caps, hand - wringing news articles of children who would never experience snowfalls, on and on... but now we're
expected to believe exactly the opposite because that's what's happening now.
Not only are these short - term «pauses» just noise in the data, but observations show that they are entirley
expected, and predicted
by climate models (i.e. see Meehl el al. 2011).
Climate models predicted that
by 2041 — 2060, the major part of the Mediterranean will become warmer except the northern Adriatic, which is
expected to become cooler (OPAMED8
model based on the A2 IPCC scenario, Figure 11c).
These methods do not use physical information provided
by climate models regarding the
expected response magnitudes to constrain the estimated responses to the forcings.
A
climate scientist, Yochanan Kushnir, said that the Mediterranean area is
expected by climate change
models to dry in the future.
Potentially severe loss of current summer range
by 2080, as projected
by Audubon's
climate model, may be most acute at high elevations, where meadows and tundra are widely
expected to suffer from
climate change.
Back in the olden days, in the days when they had the sort of «stable»
climate we are all now
expected to aspire to, long before anyone had thunk up global warming or anything, they used to amuse themselves of an evening
by singing about how natural variability is always going to happen whether the
models be right or wrong.
This forecast also suggests global temperatures over the next five years are likely to be well within, or even in the upper half, of the range of warming
expected by the CMIP5
models, as used
by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Although atmosphere — ocean
models have difficulty replicating Pliocene
climate, atmospheric
models forced
by specified surface boundary conditions are
expected to be capable of calculating global surface temperature with reasonable accuracy.
For another,
climate models have been tuned to a monotonic rise that is
expected / predicted
by precisely that empirical
model to be almost precisely what was observed, making it hard to claim that it is either «unprecedented» or «unexpected».
Previously, we could get some idea of future
climates by observing and analysing the patterns of the past but the changes we can
expect in the future will be so much greater than anything we have hitherto experienced, that these methods will not be adequate and we shall need to rely much more on computer
models which take in the full complexity of the
climate system.
Such occurrences are the
expected climate change manifestations from increasing CO2 emissions predicted
by consensus experts and
climate models.
The simple
climate model can be
expected to give results in good agreement to those that would be produced
by the AOGCMs up to 2100.
Ome would
expect that our mathematical
models would
by now be able to faithfully reproduce current average global temperatures, but this is not so — the IPCC
models all exaggerate their predictions, also indicating a lack of understanding and validation of
climate models.
By 2080, this grassland bird is
expected to lose 100 percent of its current summer range and 22 percent of its winter range, according to Audubon's
climate model.
If we were to stabilise CO2 levels at around 400 ppm, we'd
expect over the long - term a further warming of 2 to 3 °C, which is significantly greater than the warming predicted
by climate models.
Regardless,
climate models are made interesting
by the inclusion of «positive feedbacks» (multiplier effects) so that a small temperature increment
expected from increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide invokes large increases in water vapor, which seem to produce exponential rather than logarithmic temperature response in the
models.