Sentences with phrase «expedited procedures»

iii) have expedited procedures to prioritise applications from applicants to the tribunal who are old or sick or those making applications on their behalf.

In making determinations as to whether the expedited procedures should apply to a grant under the Mining Act 1978 (WA) the NNTT has consistently found that once the existence of a significant area or site on the area subject to the proposed grant is established, irrespective of the existence of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA), the expedited procedure should not apply.

In its assessment, the Taskforce has made recommendations to continue to submit exploration and prospecting licence applications to the expedited procedures process.

Institutions have also improved procedures to give arbitrators the tools to speed up certain cases that deal with recalcitrant respondents; for example, fast - track and expedited procedures and even early dismissal of hopeless claims.

Where British and EU authorities have expedited procedures for dealing with intra-EU cases, these procedures may fall away and cases will be dealt with more slowly by all countries concerned.

The answer today, in my opinion, is that we need expedited procedures for bankruptcy to reset the system, getting lenders to compromise with borrowers, and bring down the debt to GDP ratio.

According to IBM, the project will help to simplify and expedite procedures for KBank's Letter of Guarantee process, including strengthening security and reducing costs for both the customer and the bank.

The Watson reference was dealt with pursuant to the expedited procedure provided for in Article 105 (1) of the Court's Rules of Procedure and joined to the Tele2 Sverige reference for oral arguments and judgment.

We have included an express provision that if parties agree to use the SIAC Rules then they would be deemed to have agreed to the expedited procedure, including the sole arbitrator over a say three member tribunal.

The report notes that the International Chamber of Commerce has introduced an expedited procedure and the DIFC - LCIA Arbitration Centre has brought its rules in line with 2014 changes to arbitral rules.

The rule creates an expedited procedure with an effective, efficient, and predictable case management process for lower - value or less - complicated cases.

In accordance with the Rules for Expedited Arbitration, the parties may submit a limited number of petitions and shorter deadlines are applied in the expedited procedure than in the procedure under the Arbitration Rules.

For this reason, the expedited procedure is appropriate for disputes of a simpler nature.

Confidential (2015): representing buyers and managers in relation to a number of significant and complex multi-million dollar shipbuilding disputes with foreign shipyard arising under arbitration clauses providing for an expedited procedure.

The new rules provide an expedited procedure that can be initiated by the court on its own, where a vexatious claim can be dismissed without the involvement of the defendants.

15 By a separate document lodged at the same time as the application, the applicant requested that the case be dealt with under the expedited procedure pursuant to Article 152 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

Of the 62 arbitrations, ten were conducted under the expedited procedure of the Rules.

My people skills assist me in creating and maintaining effective relationships with other universities so that I can expedite the procedures involved and develop core action plans.

[1] Some governments continue such use of the expedited procedure, notwithstanding that the National Native Title Tribunal («Tribunal») has repeatedly ruled, and various parties have agreed, that numerous non «mining lease» tenements can not be granted under the NTA's expedited procedure.

The «expedited procedure» (NTA ss32 and 237) is an exception to the right to negotiate.

I understand this is a reference to the «expedited procedure» under the Native Title Act («NTA») and I find this statement inaccurate for the following reason.

The Report adopts recommendations by the Technical Taskforce in relation to the expedited procedure, specifically noting that Government should continue to use the expedited procedure for all exploration tenements with a heritage arrangement designed to address all Indigenous concerns.

Such as limiting objections to the expedited procedure, and confining the Mining Warden's jurisdiction (see section 5, above).

The Technical Taskforce notes that processing a tenement application through the expedited procedure (where there has been objection) takes around six months (Technical Taskforce Report, p40).

the Report recommends removing or limiting options for Indigenous input into the management and consideration of mineral tenement applications (e.g. confining the Mining Warden's jurisdiction, limiting objections to the expedited procedure);

the Tribunal has over-ruled the government's desire to use the expedited procedure because such use would have damaged «cultural heritage sites».

Contrary to this process, various governments use the expedited procedure in a «blanket» fashion applying it to any mineral tenement other than a mining lease.

National Native Title Tribunal (Tribunal) statistics indicate that, nationally, nearly 70 % of expedited procedure applications are not objected to, allowing the relevant tenements to be granted within six months (Neate G, Native Title and Mining Industries In Australia: Meeting The Challenges And Pursuing The Possibilities, paper delivered at Australian Mining Seminar Australia House London, 7 February 2001, pp23 - 24).

The NNTT has adopted this view despite its reservations about the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA) when considering objections to the expedited procedure under s 32 of the NTA.

Contrary to this process specified in the Act16, some governments use the expedited procedure in relation to any mineral tenement other than mining leases.17 Cases from the National Native Title Tribunal show such a policy is flawed because numerous non-mining lease tenements have been adjudged inappropriate for the expedited procedure.18 What should be occurring is that the Act is followed by considering tenement applications and determining whether the expedited procedure is justified in each case (and such justification is where the tenement only allows activities19 that are not likely to interfere with the relevant community and sites and are not likely to be a major disturbance to the particular land).

The Aboriginal Heritage Act has been considered and explained in Tribunal determinations relating to the expedited procedure.

The other major concern regarding the administrative practices adopted in the issuing of future act notifications is the ambit use of the expedited procedure under Section 32 of the Act for all exploration or prospecting leases.

[67] This process, combined with the NNTT's stated position that it will not hear objections to the application of the expedited procedure unless representative bodies provide comprehensive information when objecting to expedition, adds significantly to the costs incurred by representative bodies in responding to future act notices:

[11] That is, Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), s83 (2A) states that assistance can be granted if it will facilitate negotiation in good faith under s31 (1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) or make it more likely that the Government will consider it an act attracting the expedited procedure for future act approval under s32 (2) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth).

Given that it is an expedited procedure, if you recall the matters that I referred to earlier about how there is often not a tradition of research - although there is some with respect to sites - it is simply impossible with the existing resources to be able to do that in the incredibly short time frames involved.

There is an expedited procedure in this situation.

Western Australia, the Northern Territory and Queensland use the expedited procedure.

The principle of promptness should not operate at the expense of native title parties» right to have their objection to the application of the expedited procedure heard, especially where such a procedure removes a substantial right.

Native title parties are still able to object to the tenement's processing through the expedited procedure, but it is not expected that NTRBs will support the objections.

Consequently, the objection procedure may be the only safeguard that the expedited procedure power is exercised according to statute.

If the Tribunal requires such information before it will consider whether the expedited procedure has been appropriately applied this will prejudice the rights of native title parties.

Refusing to consider an expedited procedure objection at all is not a «speedy» way to determine an objection.

The expedited procedure is a limited exception to this general provision.

Given the discriminatory effect (referred to above) of failing to hear the concerns of Indigenous people about the impact of developments on their land in favour of the proposed development proceeding and the consequent risk that valuable native title rights may be extinguished or impaired, s7 (2)(a) applies to ensure that the Tribunal exercises its powers to hear any objections to the expedited procedure.

It is also relevant that the Federal Court accepts that an expedited procedure determination is to be made as speedily as possible.

The right to object to the expedited procedure is an important check that ensures that the expedited procedure is not applied contrary to the intention of the Act.

The check is all the more important following the Federal Court decision in Holt v Manzie [1], in which Olney J held that the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act does not apply to expedited procedure decisions.

(37) The Conditions, which have the effect of increasing the protection for the native title parties, can be placed on an exploration tenement that the government proposes to grant through the expedited procedure.

This is despite the context of the expedited procedure within the right to negotiate process and the Act as a whole, which can be read as providing greater protection to for native title.

(108) Applicants will be required to sign a «Standard Heritage Agreement» or prove they have signed an «Alternative Heritage Agreement» before the application will be submitted to the expedited procedure process under the NTA.