Sentences with phrase «expenses than the shareholders»

In a nutshell, Fidelity's target - date fund shareholders pay considerably higher expenses than the shareholders in Vanguard's target - date funds.

Not exact matches

ETFs are less expensive than mutual funds as they operate at a much lower Total Expense Ratio (TER), typically 0.5 % — 0.75 % because most ETFs are not actively managed and because ETFs are insulated from the costs incurred by unit trusts of having to buy and sell securities to accommodate shareholder purchases and redemptions.

«In a minority of cases, activist hedge funds may bring some lasting value for shareholders but largely at the expense of workers and bond holders; thus the impact of activist hedge funds appears to take the form of wealth transfer rather than wealth creation.»

«$ 8K Course To Make A Man Commit And Other Expenses Of Online Dating Main Cupid's Major Shareholder More Than Doubles His Stake»

It is beyond the scope of this initial letter to discuss in great detail these issues, such as the sale of Mr. Riggio's own college book business to BKS for more than $ 500 million and the hundreds of millions of dollars that the Company's failing and poorly - conceived Nook business may have cost shareholders, along with the Company's inexplicably high SG&A expense structure and parade of CEOs who have come and gone in the last few years.

If the fund's assets are increasing faster than its costs, you'll enjoy lower expenses as a fund shareholder.

Because NextShares are exchangetraded, their transfer agency expenses — the costs of administering shareholder accounts — are lower than for most mutual funds.

If a fund has more than 50 % of its assets invested in foreign securities, the fund may elect to pass through this foreign tax expense to its shareholders, giving them the opportunity to claim either a foreign tax credit or a deduction.

If the interest expense of the borrowing is greater than the return on the securities bought, the use of leverage will decrease the return to shareholders in the Fund.

This means any mutual fund needs to generate annual returns greater than its expense ratio in order for shareholders to profit.

But the bank charges these fees so that it could have the income necessary to pay for its branches, pay its expenses, pay its employees, make a profit and deliver shareholder value, all while giving you more free services than any for - profit business ever will.

Shareholders will pay higher expenses than they would if they invested directly in the underlying funds.

The Funds» distributor and other entities are paid under the Plans for services provided and the expenses borne by the distributor and others in the distribution of Fund shares, including the payment of commissions for sales of the shares and incentive compensation to and expenses of dealers and others who engage in or support distribution of shares or who service shareholder accounts, including overhead and telephone expenses; printing and distribution of prospectuses and reports used in connection with the offering of the Funds» shares to other than current shareholders; and preparation, printing and distribution of sales literature and advertising materials.

As long as the system requires so much time to be spent on the stages, experts, etc., then there is no possible way that a Walmart - owned firm could make money without charging more than enough to cover the costs of that protracted system and make a profit — a profit that would have to cover not only all the expenses of running the law department and paying the lawyers in it, but also producing a return on investment to the shareholders of Walmart for their foray into legal services.

Boards and shareholders are more likely to see a legal budget as an expense rather than an investment, and like any expense, it will then get carved during budget time.