Sentences with phrase «expensive than a court»

Arbitration is much faster and less expensive than court, which means that middle - class individuals or small or mid-sized (or even large) businesses can have their disputes determined quickly without incurring huge costs in time and money.

ADR may also be less expensive than court because it is less formal and there are fewer procedural steps.

The RTDRS is designed to be faster, more informal and less expensive than the courts.

Divorce mediation can be significantly less expensive than a court divorce, but it still requires payment.

Cooperating behind closed doors during mediation is almost always less expensive than a court battle, which often involves a much longer process and more hours with your attorney.

Divorce mediation can be faster, more private, and significantly less expensive than a court divorce.

Not exact matches

Courting a new customer can be five to 25 percent more expensive than retaining an existing customer.

After all, acing the algorithms to manage your online reputation is a lot less expensive than dragging the situation before the courts.

Another consideration: Although domestic trusts are less expensive than overseas ones, they haven't yet been tested in court.

More than 25 years later, the logic behind Chapter 19 still applies; the U.S. court system remains expensive, slow and unreliable when it comes to objectivity.

Bordeaux Court Deliberates on Fraud Case Involving More Than 1 Million Bottles of Wine: A Bordeaux judicial tribunal is weighing the fates of eight men accused of trying to pass off more than 1 million bottles of cheap plonk as more expensive Bordeaux from top appellationThan 1 Million Bottles of Wine: A Bordeaux judicial tribunal is weighing the fates of eight men accused of trying to pass off more than 1 million bottles of cheap plonk as more expensive Bordeaux from top appellationthan 1 million bottles of cheap plonk as more expensive Bordeaux from top appellations...

Moreover, the Connecticut Attorney General has acknowledged in these same court papers that to fund a system of magnet and charters would be more expensive than providing adequate support to the existing traditional public school system.

While the publishers involved in the case settled out of court but maintain that there was no wrongdoing — citing that the settlement terms were ultimately less expensive than the legal fees to fight the lawsuit — Apple was not offered that opportunity yet has remained smugly confident that it will come out on top.

Rather than the current mode of bringing in attorneys, a small claims court lets individuals take legal action that is typically much faster and far less expensive, although the judgments and settlements tend to be on the small potatoes scale.

While the publishers have all stated rather vehemently that they are not guilty of any wrongdoing in the matter, they opted to settle the case out of court and pay damages in the millions of dollars because it would have been less expensive than going to trial over the allegations.

If the bank believes your complaint may be investigated by the Ombudsman or that you are resolutely going to stick at court action, take up the new arguments and make it send costly barristers — it may offer a full, or more likely part, settlement — as that could be cheaper than incurring the expensive of fighting.

The level of angst in rural communities from disruption to their lives through intrusive noise and wind industry resistance to long - held community concerns has driven more than one expensive court proceedings.

Foxton was counsel to Deutsche Bank in one of the largest and, with costs of # 60m, most expensive cases ever heard by the Commercial Court, running for more than four months and resulting in an 800 - page judgment from Mr Justice Cooke.

Robert routinely advises clients on tax issues in connection with business planning and has represented clients before the IRS and the United States Tax Court; always aiming to resolve tax controversies through negotiation, which is typically less expensive and faster than a trial, thus minimizing the cost of tax disputes and their impact on business operations and productivity.

Arbitration can also be less expensive than having a full trial in the Court because it takes less time and is more informal.

It seemed «closed shop» and snobbish, and more than that, hugely expensive to the client who was compelled to pay two sets of lawyers to go to court.

Often, when a verdict is rendered in lieu of a settlement, the losing party will have to pay out considerably more money than in a settlement — because trials are expensive, and costs for putting on the trial, paying for the judge, the court reporter, the jury members» per diem, the bailiff and others, can mean even more financial pain.

Much more recently, however, the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin held that «a trial is not required if a summary judgment motion can achieve fair and just adjudication... and is a proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result than going to trial».

The process of arbitration can be much quicker, less expensive, and more convenient than going to court over a legal matter.

The start of the Michaelmas term also marks the end of the Long Vacation for the senior courts — the longest summer holiday enjoyed by any institution — longer even than MPs or pupils at the most expensive and exclusive private schools.

Many of us believe the proposed legislation is an affront to privacy, and gives law enforcement overly intrusive rights without court supervision that will in practice be no more than expensive, invasive, privacy offensive security theatre.

Provincial Court deals with claims under $ 25,000 and is less expensive and less complicated than Court of Queen's Bench.

Justice Bale found that the issue was whether the proposed summary judgment motion was likely to provide a «proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result than going to trial», citing the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Hyrniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7.

The problems I encountered were: (1) obfuscation ensured lawyers were the only conduit into the system (the process is now easy to understand with all of the new services and interactive flowcharts); (2) most of my legal fees where for services that did not require a law degree; (3) the most expensive errors were legal errors and there was no reasonable recourse for recovery; (4) the court administration was unable to handle the volume; (5) simple but essential administrative tasks, like filing documents, required either half a day or $ 100 + for every single filing; (6) Security and privacy are completely ignored, unlike every other profession; (7) there is no incentive, nor is there a governing body to ensure the matter is handled in an ethical, humane, timely manner; (8) lawyers have a monopoly and charge more than the market can bear for personal litigation.

It can also be less expensive than having a full trial in the Court.

Furthermore, a mediated divorce is usually much less expensive and takes considerably less time to complete than a traditional divorce settled in court.

«Many collaborative clients are of modest means, looking for a way to ensure they do not end up accumulating significant debt or eating up any retirement savings in a legal battle in or outside court... There are not studies to our knowledge that conclude a collaborative approach is more expensive than traditional adversarial negotiations.»

Inter partes reviews have become less than Congressionally - intended «alternative to expensive court litigation» than the prelude to court action, adding some $ 500,000 per challenge and typically 2.5 years of delay, as suits are routinely stayed for the duration.»

In the end, meeting a support obligation can be less costly than unnecessary and expensive court proceedings that may ultimately be a futile endeavor.

The court process is expensive and insurance companies would rather settle than pay lawyers to defend their side of the case.

The court system is expensive, stressful to everyone involved (including the attorneys), and ultimately assists in tearing families apart rather than helping them to peacefully resolve their divorce.

Why are simple disputes not resolved in simple, cost - effective mediation rather than by elaborate and expensive court proceedings?

The Rules of Arbitration are Not Arbitrary Some people choose to settle legal disputes using arbitration since it is much less expensive and more private than going to court.

Mediation is often more successful, less expensive and less stressful than going to court and that is why we are committed to making sure more people use it.

As most of the new contracts cover more than one court for the first time and some as many as seven, services will probably be more expensive to deliver.

Mediation can be less time - consuming, more flexible, and less expensive than proceeding in court.

Thus, litigation in court might do better at accounting for factor (3) than BMA, it does not deal will with factors (1), (2), and (4)-- it is simply not practical for many consumers to litigate — court procedures make effective pro se representation difficult, time - consuming, and expensive, and the amounts in controversy are too small.

If a litigant fails to recover more than $ 25,000, then its claim ought to have been brought in the Small Claims Court which provides for a more streamlined, less expensive, procedure.

«After six years of operation, the government has undermined this low - cost expeditious forum, it's even longer and more expensive than going through the courts, and very few decisions have been rendered.

It is also worth mentioning that in most cases, even though you will still be required to pay a court fee when you choose defensive driving to take care of your ticket, it is still usually less expensive than paying for the ticket.

Collaborative Divorce can be more cost - effective than traditional divorces, as there are no expensive and time - consuming motions and papers to file before the court.

Collaborative family law cases are substantially less expensive than cases taken to court.

Mediation can lead to a more rapid and less expensive resolution than is possible through the use of the court.

An uncontested divorce will still involve some attorneys» fees and court costs, but it is far less expensive than litigating a case in court.

There are several reasons: (a) it's less adversarial than going to court; (b) it's more private; (c) you retain control of the process — i.e., you are not bound by what the mediator thinks (indeed, most mediators see their role as helping the parties effectuate their goals, not imposing the mediator's ideas); (d) it's usually much less expensive; (e) if there are children involved, the process is less likely to embroil them in a painful conflict; and (f) mediation often gives divorcing couples a better chance of successfully negotiating issues that may come up in the future (such as child support, alimony, or custody and visitation issues).