Sentences with phrase «expensive than going to court»

Divorce mediation is always worth a try since its significantly less expensive than going to court.

Mediation is far less expensive than going to court with attorneys.

Many people find that mediation is quicker, less stressful and less expensive than going to court.

Not exact matches

While the publishers have all stated rather vehemently that they are not guilty of any wrongdoing in the matter, they opted to settle the case out of court and pay damages in the millions of dollars because it would have been less expensive than going to trial over the allegations.

If the bank believes your complaint may be investigated by the Ombudsman or that you are resolutely going to stick at court action, take up the new arguments and make it send costly barristers — it may offer a full, or more likely part, settlement — as that could be cheaper than incurring the expensive of fighting.

It seemed «closed shop» and snobbish, and more than that, hugely expensive to the client who was compelled to pay two sets of lawyers to go to court.

Much more recently, however, the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Hryniak v. Mauldin held that «a trial is not required if a summary judgment motion can achieve fair and just adjudication... and is a proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result than going to trial».

The process of arbitration can be much quicker, less expensive, and more convenient than going to court over a legal matter.

Justice Bale found that the issue was whether the proposed summary judgment motion was likely to provide a «proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result than going to trial», citing the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Hyrniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7.

The Rules of Arbitration are Not Arbitrary Some people choose to settle legal disputes using arbitration since it is much less expensive and more private than going to court.

Mediation is often more successful, less expensive and less stressful than going to court and that is why we are committed to making sure more people use it.

There are several reasons: (a) it's less adversarial than going to court; (b) it's more private; (c) you retain control of the process — i.e., you are not bound by what the mediator thinks (indeed, most mediators see their role as helping the parties effectuate their goals, not imposing the mediator's ideas); (d) it's usually much less expensive; (e) if there are children involved, the process is less likely to embroil them in a painful conflict; and (f) mediation often gives divorcing couples a better chance of successfully negotiating issues that may come up in the future (such as child support, alimony, or custody and visitation issues).

If a dispute can be resolved through mediation, it will be significantly less expensive than having to go to court.

Mediation is usually an advantageous alternative to court because it is less expensive and faster than going through a court trial.

Collaborative divorce can be much less expensive than divorce litigation and may take less time than if your divorce went to court.

It's also often less expensive than traditional divorces that go to court.

It's more expensive than mediation, since you both have attorneys representing you, but less stressful than going to court, so it's a great way to resolve things in a confidential manner.

Mediation is significantly less expensive than Collaborative Divorce or going to court.

Based on the concept that both spouses hire legal representation yet agree to resolve their differences without going to court, Collaborative divorce is generally less expensive and quicker than litigation, gives the couple greater control over the outcome of their divorce, and keeps children out of the controversy.