They have a low price - to - earnings and price - to - book ratios — which is why they're less
expensive than growth stocks.
They have low price - to - earnings and price - to - book ratios — which is why they're less
expensive than growth stocks.
Not exact matches
For example, if company ABC and XYZ are both selling for $ 50 a share, one might be far more
expensive than the other depending upon the underlying profits and
growth rates of each
stock.
In contrast, dividend
growth stocks, primarily from cyclical sectors like technology, tend to be higher quality and less
expensive than those higher yielders.
The average member of this group should grow by about 11 %, far lower
than the most
expensive stocks» 20 %
growth rate, but at less
than half the valuation.
During the tech bubble
growth stocks became more
expensive, pushing the value discount to more
than 70 % at the market peak in 2000.
During the tech bubble
growth stocks became more
expensive, pushing the value discount to more
than 70 % at the market peak in 2000.
In contrast, dividend
growth stocks, primarily from cyclical sectors like technology, tend to be higher quality and less
expensive than those higher yielders.
But with global
growth still sluggish and bond and
stock prices looking
expensive, balancing income and risk is more important (and challenging)
than ever.