Sentences with phrase «expensive than litigation»

In addition to being generally less expensive than litigation, is the collaborative process is also faster than traditional litigation?

The collaborative divorce process allows parties to create an agreement tailored to their family's specific situation and needs, reduces the risk of post-divorce conflict, and is less expensive than litigation.

Peace Talks» collaborative divorce is the preferable way to dissolve your marriage because it is 90 % less expensive than litigation.

While hiring a fully staffed Collaborative team may be expensive, the process may be much less expensive than litigation because the team works together to get to the root of underlying emotional and mental health issues hindering resolution.

It is generally more expensive than mediation, and less expensive than litigation.

It is true that mediation is usually much less expensive than litigation.

On average, both mediation and collaborative law are significantly less expensive than litigation and faster and less devastating from an emotional standpoint.

In general, the Collaborative Process is significantly less expensive than litigation.

While divorce mediation is far less expensive than litigation given that you are not hiring two attorneys and blowing through your valuable time, it is still a valuable service.

Collaborative Practice is not more expensive than litigation.

Mediation provides a less formal and more expeditious way of reaching a resolution, and is always significantly less expensive than litigation.

Is less expensive than litigation and leaves participants with a greater degree of satisfaction.

The arbitration process is generally faster and less expensive than litigation in the case of a dispute.

Not exact matches

Most lenders will accept settlement for less than a debt's full balance, because litigation is expensive and forcing you into bankruptcy would mean they could receive even less.

Third, general comments indicated surprise that the simulation was «more interesting than I expected,» that there are actually alternatives to litigation, and that mediation can be expensive.

Bootstrap Legal chooses arbitration because it is usually less expensive and quicker than litigation and will allow us to resolve our disputes privately.

A poorly drafted agreement increases the likelihood that litigation will occur, and makes litigation vastly more expensive than it should be.

On the positive side, this team approach still is likely to be less expensive than resort to litigation.21 Furthermore, the resulting agreement and more positive relationships may prevent many future problems with unknown but potentially substantial costs.

However, whilst one of the objectives of the Financial List is to reduce the time and cost of litigation through learning from test cases, financial markets disputes will remain extremely expensive, often with costs of more than # 10 million attached.

The problems I encountered were: (1) obfuscation ensured lawyers were the only conduit into the system (the process is now easy to understand with all of the new services and interactive flowcharts); (2) most of my legal fees where for services that did not require a law degree; (3) the most expensive errors were legal errors and there was no reasonable recourse for recovery; (4) the court administration was unable to handle the volume; (5) simple but essential administrative tasks, like filing documents, required either half a day or $ 100 + for every single filing; (6) Security and privacy are completely ignored, unlike every other profession; (7) there is no incentive, nor is there a governing body to ensure the matter is handled in an ethical, humane, timely manner; (8) lawyers have a monopoly and charge more than the market can bear for personal litigation.

In the mainstream, London mid-tier and hybrid firms, failure rates range from 15 - 25 %, which is certainly expensive enough.The most interesting findings of the research this year are that US firms are worse hirers than UK firms, that hires from in - house directly into partnership suffer much greater failure rates than from other law firms, and that hires into transactional areas such as corporate and finance are markedly more likely to fail than those into specialist areas or litigation.

The hope was that arbitration would produce a just result in a more timely and less expensive manner than in litigation.

Inter partes reviews have become less than Congressionally - intended «alternative to expensive court litigation» than the prelude to court action, adding some $ 500,000 per challenge and typically 2.5 years of delay, as suits are routinely stayed for the duration.»

Mediation is usually less expensive than traditional litigation, faster and overall a much more constructive process.

Thus, litigation in court might do better at accounting for factor (3) than BMA, it does not deal will with factors (1), (2), and (4)-- it is simply not practical for many consumers to litigate — court procedures make effective pro se representation difficult, time - consuming, and expensive, and the amounts in controversy are too small.

Arbitration is frequently slower, and frequently more expensive, than litigation.

That could mean litigation becoming more drawn out and, perhaps, being no less expensive than it is now.

Discovery is often very expensive for defendants in patent infringement cases; it's one of several factors that can make patent litigation much more costly for the defendant than for the plaintiff.

Most defendants choose to settle because patent litigation is risky and expensive — and trolls offer settlement amounts that, although still incredibly burdensome, are far cheaper than a lawsuit.

As a neutral third party, Bernie Behrend guides you through the issues to resolve disputes in a less expensive and more efficient manner than litigation.

One of her driving goals is to «educate, educate, educate» everyone about divorce mediation and to make mediation the go - to solution to divorce, rather than the expensive and sometimes traumatic litigation solution.

What's more, collaborative divorce is less stressful, faster and generally less expensive than «traditional divorce» or courtroom litigation.

Mediators can help couples get divorced in a more amicable, private, faster and less expensive way than divorce litigation.

The process is faster and generally less expensive than courtroom litigation.

The mediation process is faster, easier and generally less expensive than courtroom litigation

The popularity of collaborative divorce has seen a dramatic rise in the last few years for several reasons: its goal is to take less time than traditional litigation, it allows for certain levels of creativity when addressing sensitive issues such as alimony and splitting of marital assets, it provides confidentiality to the divorcing couple, and perhaps most important, it can be less expensive than other methods of divorce.

The main reason it can be said that litigation is more expensive than mediation is because solicitors are usually paid by the hour, and those whose arrangements are decided by a court take much longer.

He has been trained in and practices collaborative divorce, a gentler, less expensive, and quicker way to resolve divorces by agreement reached by the parties directly but in the presence of and with the assistance of their attorneys who commit to settlement rather than litigation of each aspect of ending the marital enterprise and beginning life anew on their own.

Collaborative divorce is a gentler, less expensive, and quicker way to resolve divorces by agreement reached by the parties directly but in the presence of and with the assistance of their attorneys who commit to settlement rather than litigation of each aspect of ending the marital enterprise and beginning life anew on their own.

He also has been trained in and practices collaborative divorce, a gentler, less expensive, and quicker way to resolve divorces by agreement reached by the parties directly but in the presence of and with the assistance of their attorneys who commit to settlement rather than litigation of each aspect of ending the marital enterprise and beginning life anew on their own.

It can be far less expensive than the traditional litigation model, especially in divorces.

And, the win - lose litigation game is generally about 10 times more expensive than a mediated agreement.

Don't assume that power imbalances leave participants with no other choice than the prospect of (expensive) litigation where privacy, convenience, and flexibility become a thing of the past.

Collaborative divorce is not the least expensive divorce process option, but it is still cheaper than full - on litigation.

First and foremost, medication is often significantly less expensive and faster than litigation.

Collaborative divorce can be much less expensive than divorce litigation and may take less time than if your divorce went to court.

Mediation, by comparison, is significantly less expensive than either litigation or collaborative process; typical mediation fees are in the $ 2,750 to $ 4,000 range.

Parents should also know that divorce mediation in Arizona is confidential, at least 80 - 90 % less expensive than typical litigation legal fees, and concludes in a matter of only 2 - 4 months on average, compared to a lengthy court experience that can last a year or more.

It is a friendlier and less expensive process than litigation.

Because mediation relies on informal discovery rather than formal and expensive discovery, people actually tend to get more information in mediation than in litigation.