The popularity of collaborative divorce has seen a dramatic rise in the last few years for several reasons: its goal is to take less time than traditional litigation, it allows for certain levels of creativity when addressing sensitive issues such as alimony and splitting of marital assets, it provides confidentiality to the divorcing couple, and perhaps most important, it can be less
expensive than other methods of divorce.
This method is much more
expensive than other methods of addressing climate change that are currently underutilized.
You will usually pay half or less of the original retail price for items at a consignment sale, which makes this a bit more
expensive than other methods of shopping for used kids clothes, but still saves over buying new.
Not exact matches
Some recipes calls for bao flour or Hongkong flour (gives your bao a whiter colour
than normal flour but Hongkong flour is very
expensive if you live overseas), while
others uses a traditional
method which takes 3 days but gives a fluffy outcome.
NAVS maintains that not only is animal testing of any kind inhumane, but it's also more
expensive and less reliable
than other methods which do not rely on inflicting pain and suffering on rabbits and
other furry friends.
This is significantly more
expensive than all the
other methods you could use for paying your rent with a credit card.
Some
methods of family planning are more effective — and more
expensive —
than others.
Most attorneys who practice collaborative divorce claim that it can be substantially less
expensive than other divorce
methods (regular divorce or mediation).
However, my experience is that the collaborative process is usually quicker and less
expensive in most cases, and much less
expensive in complex cases,
than other methods.