What robots can never have, which humans have, argues Bringsjord, is phenomenological consciousness: «the first - hand
experience of conscious thought», as Justin Hart of the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, Canada, puts it.
Not exact matches
Near - death studies are about the best we have and anecdotally I
think that many people do report «
conscious»
experience whether that's due to anoxia or otherwise there is no substantial evidence suggesting the absence
of «consciousness.»
And it is
conscious: that is, it does not stay below the threshold
of consciousness and work there unknown to the soul (as, for instance, infant baptism is
thought by some to do), but comes within the field
of awareness where the man can «know» it as he knows any other fact
of experience.
In particular, the denial that epistemology is wholly prior to ontology; the denial that we can have an absolutely certain starting point; the idea that those elements
of experience thought by most people to be primitive givens are in fact physiologically, personally, and socially constructed; the idea that all
of our descriptions
of our observations involve culturally conditioned interpretations; the idea that our interpretations, and the focus
of our
conscious attention, are conditioned by our purposes; the idea that the so - called scientific method does not guarantee neutral, purely objective, truths; and the idea that most
of our ideas do not correspond to things beyond ourselves in any simple, straightforward way (for example, red as we see it does not exist in the «red brick» itself).
Though it has been done, it is philosophical stupidity to deny either that we
experience spatially extended objects or that we
experience ourselves as active
conscious centers
of feeling,
experience,
thought, intention, attention, volition, desire, emotion, satisfaction, etc..
The stream
of human
conscious experience and creative activity (the human mind or soul) has one vitally important property in process
thought that it does not have in Cartesian metaphysics: it is spatially (as well as temporally) extended.
By psychic phenomena I understand all immediately «given»
conscious experiences, that is to say, sensations, mental images, feelings,
thoughts and processes
of volition.
When we take
conscious experience as our basis for understanding what
experience is, we
think of receiving and responding to stimuli from the body and the environment,
of emotion, purpose, and
thought,
of the significant organization
of data and the influencing
of action.
Basically, his solution takes the form
of distinguishing two different levels
of human
experience, or
of more or less
conscious thinking about
experience, on only the deeper
of which is there an
experience of God that is both direct and universal.
The distinction Hartshorne insists on making here as applied to our present question can be expressed by saying that, whereas mere
experience or feeling
of God can be not only direct but immediate, high - level
thought or cognition
of God, being mediated, as it is, by the
conscious judgment or interpretation
of such feeling, is
of necessity mediate.
Illusion is now
thought to be omnipresent in definite,
conscious perceptual
experience — yet the dichotomy between physical objects and illusions was introduced to express observable differences within the field
of conscious perception.
Nevertheless, despite the wonder
of this prophetic vision, as we read the New Testament we may sometimes be
conscious of a vast and timeless energy confined within the
thought - forms and restricted knowledge
of the first century A.D. Today the
experience, knowledge and responsibility
of every
thinking man is very much greater than that
of most
of the men
of New Testament days.
I explained the phenomena as partly due to explicitly
conscious processes
of thought and will, but as due largely also to the subconscious incubation and maturing
of motives deposited by the
experiences of life.
Thus, when we
think of reality as consisting
of moments
of experience, we are
conscious that reality is always becoming.
If a man in despair is as he
thinks conscious of his despair, does not talk about it meaninglessly as
of something which befell him (pretty much as when a man who suffers from vertigo talks with nervous self - deception about a weight upon his head or about its being like something falling upon him, etc., this weight and this pressure being in fact not something external but an inverse reflection from an inward
experience), and if by himself and by himself only he would abolish the despair, then by all the labor he expends he is only laboring himself deeper into a deeper despair.
A great many
of the responses to Bell assume that there is only one right way to
think about the destiny
of people who do not put their trust in Christ in this life: they will
experience eternal,
conscious punishment in hell.
A
conscious field plus its object as felt or
thought of plus an attitude towards the object plus the sense
of a self to whom the attitude belongs — such a concrete bit
of personal
experience may be a small bit, but it is a solid bit as long as it lasts; not hollow, not a mere abstract element
of experience, such as the «object» is when taken all alone.
«On the contrary, I
think that we need to come to terms with fear because the
conscious feeling
of fear is a key part
of human
experience and an important factor in psychopathology.
The intrusive
thoughts you may
experience throughout the day or before bed illustrate the disconcerting fact that many
of the functions
of the mind are outside
of conscious control.
By giving children the tools that help them tap into their creativity, harness a sense
of personal agency, and in effect, personalize their own
experience, we are teaching resilience, critical
thinking, and helping them to develop a
conscious knowledge
of self that will carry them far.
Psychology is referred to as the science
of behaviour and mind, embracing all aspects
of conscious and unconscious
experiences as well as
thoughts.
However, flexing the muscle
of an affirmation with the
conscious expression
of your own words,
thoughts and
experiences is a transformative thing.
Respecting the need for confidentiality, empathy, honesty and humor, I encourage the exploration
of conscious and unconscious
thoughts / feelings and help to identify how significant past
experiences have influenced the present.
I
think about my clients and their
experiences from a psychodynamic framework; meaning that I believe that the problems clients face are rooted in both current and past relational
experiences as well as in feelings outside
of conscious awareness.
IT WOULD BE MY PRIVILEGE TO HELP YOU TO LEARN: * Get into your heart * Quiet your mind * Organize your
thinking *
Experience «Being Present» * Be real with yourself and others * Get comfortable with discomfort * View challenges as opportunities to grow * Get clear on what is happening inside
of you * Learn to be centered and calm during turmoil * Accept «what is» without resisting, in order to feel peace * Become aware
of your feelings without getting lost in them * Feel more comfortable about facing fears and the unknown * Step out
of your
thoughts and view them from a calm place inside * Learn to take clear,
conscious action steps in life that are guided by your inner wisdom.