What do you think of Matthew's response to the challenge that he is «elevating
his experience over Scripture.»
This led some in Matthew's church (he had come out to a small group) to accuse him of «elevating
his experience over Scripture.»
«At the heart of mysticism is the primacy of
experience over Scripture.
Not exact matches
On the level of authority, the
Scripture is set
over against reason and tradition (understood both ecclesiastically and as the cumulative and collected wisdom of personal
experience).
I know her hard work and service
over at Redeemer Presbyterian Church far exceeds her job description and that many, many people have been blessed by her wisdom,
experience, insight into
Scripture, and grace.
Many works are consciously designed to accommodate «selective» reading, and most readers
over the centuries have
experienced the Bible in just this way (including Jesus, who frequently quoted
Scripture» even as he hung on the cross).
All these
scriptures / Biblical teachings created a problem for me as
over the years when I would
experience psychotic symptoms and psychic phenomena as a result of intense / deep prayer and meditation, I actually thought that God was trying to show me a sign or tell me something or he was leading me in a particular direction.
«Neither Peter in his work to include Gentiles in the church nor the abolitionists in their campaign against slavery argued that their
experience should take precedence
over Scripture,» writes Matthew.