Sentences with phrase «experience with scripture»

It is a six - week online experience with scripture, readings, reflection, spiritual exercises, and a few surprises.

I will argue that my experience with Scripture will certainly come to include theoretical knowledge about Scripture but that this only becomes relevant in the fight of my concrete experience with the truth of Scripture, much of which can never be fully articulated.

Not exact matches

In this engagement with Scripture, Evangelicals and Catholics are learning from one another: Catholics from the Evangelical emphasis on group Bible study and commitment to the majestic and final authority of the written word of God; and Evangelicals from the Catholic emphasis on Scripture in the liturgical and devotional life, informed by the lived experience of Christ's Church through the ages.

(5) All of this is to argue that the very logic of the Wesleyan tradition is basically at odds with the fundamentalist experience and that this extends to the understanding of the nature and function of Scripture.

I'm sorry now that I don't remember where it is found in the bible, but during these times where I had experienced the most hardship with relationships and bullying, a particular scripture kept coming up in my heart about letting Christ be my defender.

Even we can debate according to Scriptures and cross reference with the best manuscript available, the Word of God and Rhema Word of God is still being experienced and intepreted differently and uniquely by all of us though it could similar but not the same.

Rather than insisting that scripture make the doctrine of the Trinity explicit, perhaps we should allow the Trinity to remain implicit and affirm it out of our own experience, our own living with God.

Could it be that you have been experiencing some cognitive dissonance with being a believer and a high view of scripture whilst advocating the pointing finger where the bible here places such action in the same light as oppression.

If you are not experiencing opposition in this life as a Christian than you need to take another look at the truth that the Bible and Christ taught... Jesus was a revolutionary figure who opposed the society and people that he lived with... He was not a person who was sugary sweet... and He didn't tell people what they wanted to hear... as Scripture says, the path to heaven is narrow and Few choose it... the road to hell is wide and most are following that path.

He says at the end of his post that when it comes to our connection with the holy, «God promises us no more» than Scripture as a means to knowing and experiencing his presence.

Now, here's where I suspect Challies and I may agree: Because we believe Scripture to be authoritative in matters of faith and practice and a trustworthy testimony regarding Jesus Christ, we would be right to be highly suspicious of anyone whose claims about their experiences with God run contrary to the teachings of Scripture.

Just as the original text is imbued with Scripture, so Bishop Gilbert's approach in these conferences is full of insights from his own personal experience of lectio divina.

This formulation makes sense, but I find myself compelled by Scripture, reason and experience to disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.

This experience with Christ is ultimately the source of power that is often associated with Scripture (Rom.

The undergirding of the cause of theological learning with endowed chairs and programs, whose chief behest will be an honest respect for the normative character of «the Wesleyan quadrilateral»: Scripture, tradition, reason and «Christian experience.»

The reflection on this scriptural self - witness and our continuing experience with the text lead to our confession of the nature of Scripture.

Therefore, reason and experience, along with Scripture and tradition, deserve to be given formative roles in the church's life.

Of course our doctrine of inspiration does not grow out of our experience with the Bible, but from the teaching of Scripture itself But that truth does not become actual apart from a real interaction between the text and my experience.

I applied this type of thinking all the time to my own life — reverse engineering my experiences to fit with specific scriptures — and it is such a backwards approach, emotionally exhausting and intellectually frustrating.

The process through which experience is positively correlated with scripture is possible only through the hermeneutics of trust.

They are learning what it means to follow Jesus into the world, to experience true community with other believers, to read Scripture in a new light, and to serve others out of love rather than compulsion.

Just as there is a human wisdom that comes with maturity and is the result of the interaction of experience and critical reflection, so there is a theological wisdom that comes with maturity and is the result of the interaction of critical reflection, of experience in the church, of engagement with Scripture, of Christian witness today, and of the testimony of the Holy Spirit.9

What would it mean to go to the scriptures — for example, to the Pauline metaphor of the body and its members — with such contemporary experiences and questions fully present and articulated?

Rather than accepting as authoritative Scripture's total witness, the interpreter uses either his subjective experience with the Christ, or his contemporary sensibility, or the church's traditional understanding of the gospel, or perhaps some combination of these to judge what reasonably the «whole Bible» might be saying.

For our ethical considerations on peace, peace - ministry, conflict resolution, Christians may profit from reading the Old Testament, our Holy Scripture, as a witness to the experience of a people in war and peace with other nations and as a reflection on what peace requires of the community.

There are better ways to understand the cross that fit with who we know Jesus to be in the inward experience of our relationship with God and with the witness of Scripture.

The author finds himself compelled by Scripture, reason and experience to disagree with much of what constitutes traditional doctrine.

And for this reason, the question of whether this view is correct or not shouldn't be argued on the basis of conformity with the church tradition but on the basis of Scripture, reason and experience.

But I am hopeful, because the experience of leaving that job opened my eyes and mind to a whole new way of viewing people, thinking about theology, reading Scripture, interacting with others, and ultimately, living life.

It is humbling to know that all our understanding of God and scripture is subject to our personal experience and journey with him!

Good starts with the human mindâ $ ™ s conclusions based on experience, selected research, and hunches, and then canonizes which scriptures support these conclusions and rejects the rest.

The only way to know God is to experience God and no matter how inspired scripture is, you can't have a relationship with a book.

As Eugene Ulrich and William G. Thompson conclude, «Scripture, which began as experience, was produced through a process of tradition (s) being formulated about that experience and being reformulated by interpreters in dialogue with the experience of their communities and with the larger culture.»

Whatever experiences led to his impressive knowledge of Scripture and human nature are no doubt interesting, but Thomas comes to us as one with a message infinitely more important than his own story.

Paul's own distinctive contributions to Christian thought are to be sharply distinguished from what he received by tradition; and it will be found, when these are segregated, that they point to several sources: (a) his own personal experience, that of an intense spiritual nature with a keen imagination and a desperately sensitive conscience; (b) a peculiar exegesis of the Old Testament, partly rabbinic, partly early Christian, but more probably derived from his own reading and pondering of the Greek version of the Jewish scriptures; (c).

The idea requires much unpacking and explanation, but once understood, I think his definition fits quite well with our experience in life and with what we read in Scripture.

Daphne McLeod's experience -LCB- Faith January / February 2011) shows the practical outcomes of this drift with the young being misled even within the Church by attempts to set aside Judeo - Christian history scripture tradition andteaching.

This only happens occasionally in the book but prevents the reader sharing in the deeper revelation and love of God that is occurring at that point in salvation history, especially in light of the New Testament, and raises the question that if the person in Scripture who is experiencing this unique relationship with God didn't really understand God, then how can we?

Once we come to understand that the salvation word family almost never (if ever) explicitly refers to eternal life but instead refers to some sort of deliverance from the calamities of life such as danger, suffering, sickness, and premature death, or to some sort of negative experience at the Judgment Seat of Christ, we can readily teach along with Scripture that salvation is conditional upon what we believe and how we behave.

Their life would be morally discrete from the life of other men, and there is no saying, in the absence of positive experience of an authentic kind — for there are few active examples in our scriptures, and the Buddhistic examples are legendary, --(As where the future Buddha, incarnated as a hare, jumps into the fire to cook himself for a meal for a beggar — having previously shaken himself three times, so that none of the insects in his fur should perish with him.)

Just as Traherne's experience of the glorious world, focused in scripture, became a communion with God in all saints, so this other dark individual experience is also a communion with others.

My experience with AA included the smoke filled rooms filled with thankful people spouting Scripture for their own means of salvation from their inner demons.

There are two kinds of knowledge: one is the result of the study of the scriptures, but the other is realization or experience of union with the Divine.

Fishon... I think you may have misunderstood my last comment, but upon reading it myself, I'm less clear than I thot.Nevertheless, I agree with you and that was my point, most believers that I know or read about have their initial conversion experience long before they adopt developed doctrines of scripture.

Only ignorant, wet behind the ears, children that have little real experience or exposure to scripture or a relationship to the Lord; would make such statements as «Evangelicals believe he walked around with a Halo».

The illustration suggests that he should study the theological resources of Scripture, history, and doctrine; and study also, with equal seriousness, what he knows of the related meanings from his own authority of both traditional and contemporary experience; and how to recognize the authenticity of the dialogue, both historical and contemporary, be - tween God and man and the dependence of each on the other.

Drawing from the rich imagery of Scripture and speaking transparently from his own experience, Martin offers a series of reflections on surviving loss, failure, and change with your faith and humanity intact.

The Evangelical commitment to the Bible means shaping consciences of people by the doctrines and propositions of Scripture, of course, but also experiencing the world with a sense of one's place in the biblical story.

We must always be re-evaluating our theology, measuring it against Scripture, reason, tradition, experience, and I would add conferring with our brothers and sisters, and listening to the Spirit.

But I also know from Scripture and experience that being a full - time, paid pastor comes with certain expectations about what you will look like, and how your career will advance.