Children who
experienced avoidant attachments with their primary caregiver can go on to develop dismissive attachment styles in adulthood.
Not exact matches
When, in the beginning of their article, the authors spell out their expectations for how their results might turn out, they come up with three possible hypotheses: (1) single people are more
avoidant in their
attachment styles than coupled people are; (2) single people are more anxious in their
attachments than coupled people are, maybe because «they have been rejected by relationship partners who would not accept their anxiety, clinginess, and intrusiveness;» and (3) single and coupled people are similar in their
attachment experiences.
Avoidant Attachment Style — similarly to anxiously attached adults, avoidantly attached adults may have
experienced a lack of attention to their emotional needs as children and now struggle to allow themselves to be vulnerable with others.
The role of oxytocin (OT) and early
experience in shaping an
avoidant attachment in females is also discussed.
This pattern of absent or cruel caregivers is associated with the
avoidant attachment style: 1,2 The lack of love and support that Don
experienced as a child likely taught him that he can't really depend on anyone but himself.
Individual Factors:
Attachment styles (fearful,
avoidant, anxious, and secure), destiny and growth beliefs, and the Big Five personality traits (openness to
experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism).
Nickola Overall and colleagues have investigated how
avoidant attachment affects how people identify and perceive negative emotions that their partners are
experiencing.1 The researchers compared how accurately
avoidant participants, as compared to anxious or secure individuals, could identify anger, sadness, or hurt in their partners.
Insecure, ambivalent,
avoidant, or disorganized early
attachment experiences are real events, which — according to
attachment theory — can substantially and destructively shape a client's emotional and relational development.
«People with
avoidant attachment histories are too closed down to have access to
experience their right - hemisphere processes,» says Daniel Siegel, who's probably done as much as anybody in the field to induce therapists to clasp both
attachment theory and neuroscience to their collective bosom.
Contrary to meta - analytic findings of the earlier literature that focused only on the effects of the amount of care provided without adequately controlling for selection effects, the NICHD Study found that a number of features of child care (the amount of child care, age of entry into care, and the quality and stability of child care) were unrelated to the security of infant — mother
attachments or to an increased likelihood of
avoidant attachments, except when mothers provided less sensitive parenting of their infant.11 For the children who received less sensitive maternal care, extended
experience with child care, lower - quality child care, and more changes in child care arrangements were each associated with an increased likelihood of developing an insecure
attachment with their mothers.
Perhaps four of these maxims, or conditions for therapeutic change, upon which probably most
attachment - oriented therapists would agree are: (1) Insecure, ambivalent,
avoidant, or disorganized early
attachment experiences are real events which can substantially and destructively shape a client's emotional and relational development (the client's adult problems don't originate in childhood - based fantasies).
A child «s score on the RADQ can be used to estimate the severity of his / her
attachment disorder, and may indicate whether the child
experiences an anxious,
avoidant, or ambivalent type of
attachment disorder.
Babies with a «slow to warm up» temperament (those who took a while to get used to new
experiences) are likely to have insecure -
avoidant attachments.
The
Experiences in Close Relationships Scale — Short Version (ECR - S)[68] measures
avoidant and anxious
attachment styles.
Avoidant / ambivalent
attachment style as a mediator between abusive childhood
experiences and adult relationship difficulties.
The impact of specific life events, such as parental divorce, on
attachment orientations in adulthood are important to consider as those who
experience this tend to be less securely attached, report greater relationship problems and are more likely to have an
avoidant - fearful
attachment style [60].
[jounal] Rholes, W. S. / 2006 /
Avoidant attachment and the
experience of parenting / Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (3): 275 ~ 285