Material substance was considered to be an independent reality which produces the aspects directly
experienced by the mind.
Not exact matches
The hope is that projects like Absolut deadmau5 that only require a smartphone and cheap Google (goog) Cardboard headset to operate will help consumers
experience and be captivated
by some form of VR, never
mind that it's not as immersive or breathtaking as the higher - end devices.
Such novel
experiences help unleash your imagination
by forcing the
mind out of its tendency to rely on categories and take shortcuts, according to neuroscientist Gregory Berns.
«SMX London is programmed
by the sharpest
minds and most
experienced team in search marketing.
Because your reality is continually created
by your
mind working in concert with itself, there is simply no reason to believe that your «real» out - of - body
experience was created
by some other process.
It is in his Critique that he posits that a priori knowledge is possible only if the world itself depends on the way the human
mind structures its
experience, through insights Kant found
by examining Copernican astronomy.
The finest hours in the history of this noble country were
experienced when the spiritual fuel generated
by that ethos was internalized within the hearts and
minds of its people.
3 And smaller numbers seek, or are influenced
by,
experiences of clairvoyance, telepathy, precognition, and other extrasensory perceptions that provide clues to their views of the personal as well as the cosmic
mind.4
In that search, the individual and the community are open to inspiration from many quarters, but inspiration that is tested
by the
mind of Christ and the common
experience of the group.
As has been noted, Holloway argues that a proper appreciation of how sex should be used needs to bear in
mind the fact that our present
experience of it is coloured
by concupiscence.
But he has been given powers of body and
mind and qualities of forethought and the ability to profit
by experience.
Our
minds, our worldviews, are molded
by our childhood environments and, perhaps to a lesser degree,
by our
experiences.
Without his putting himself in a religious frame of
mind, creating for himself religious
experiences, awakening within himself a so - called natural consciousness of God, thus without his being compelled to adopt forms of consciousness which he can no longer recapture, he must be encountered in his life, which has become secular,
by the good news from the Lord of the world, who has committed himself in the man Jesus of Nazareth to the world and the secularity of the stable and the gallows («without the camp» of religion, Hebrews 13:13) 15
your understanding of the change process is very simplistic, because your
mind is not open, you specifically believe already in the traditional doctrines, Dogmas as shown in thousands of years of history evolves, and the need for input variables, meaning the diversity of religious belief is necessay because nature through his will is requiring this to happen, we are being educated
by God in the events of history.In the past when there was no humans yet Gods will is directly manifisted in nature, with our coming and education through history, we gradually takes the responsibilty of implementing the will.Your complaint on your perception of abuse is just part of the complex process of educating us through
experience.
There is no evidence for a god, and there is no evidence that people have ever
experienced anything inside their
minds that pointed to something that was objectively true OUTSIDE of their
minds, but which could not be
experienced by others unless they too had a «personal
experience» of it.
And so may you pass from death to life, from the authority of tradition to the
experience of knowing God; thus will you pass from darkness to light, from a racial faith inherited to a personal faith achieved
by actual
experience; and thereby will you progress from a theology of
mind handed down
by your ancestors to a true religion of spirit which shall be built up in your souls as an eternal endowment.
The hope of human brotherhood can only be realized when, and as, the divergent
mind religions of authority become impregnated with, and overshadowed
by, the unifying and ennobling religion of the spirit — the religion of personal spiritual
experience.
Again Hartshorne, having conceded that, relatively speaking, molecules are mindless, denies that they (or their constituents) are totally lacking in
experience and continues: «the panpsychist... further will not admit that the lower degrees of awareness are due to the dilution of
mind by its mixture with increasing doses of another something, matter» (BH 170).
For him, as for Whitehead too, dualism of
mind and matter is replaced
by a gradation of higher and lower degrees of
experience.
Most of us have been strongly influenced
by these since birth and have great difficulty in finding freedom we have not yet
experienced the necessary renewing of
mind.
And Whitehead says that he does not think it is inevitable that the human
mind spatializes, though it often does this, and when it does, one way or another, whether through partiality or something else, it deforms the object of knowledge and of
experience... [But] Bergson believed that, at least to some significant degree, the spatializing tendencies of the human intellect and of human intelligence, can be overcome
by a biology and a physics that is less mechanistic.
These objections are likely to be reinforced in the
minds of those who make them
by the qualifications which Buber sets for the philosophical anthropologist: that he must be an individual to whom man's existence as man has become questionable, that he must have
experienced the tension of solitude, and that he must discover the essence of man not as a scientific observer, removed in so far as possible from the object that he observes, but as a participant who only afterwards gains the distance from his subject matter which will enable him to formulate the insights he has attained.
His College: The Undergraduate
Experience in America (Harper & Row, 328 pp., $ 19.95), a report sponsored
by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, describes the dusky condition of liberal education in recent years, but he writes with the hope of a sunrise in
mind.
A debate in which the thoughts are not expressed in the way in which they existed in the
mind but in the speaking are so pointed that they may strike home in the sharpest way, and moreover without the men that are spoken to being regarded in any way present as persons; a conversation characterized
by the need neither to communicate something, nor to learn something, nor to innuence someone, nor to come into connexion with someone, but solely
by the desire to have one's own self - reliance confirmed
by making the impression that is made, or if it has become unsteady to have it strengthened; a friendly chat in which each regards himself as absolute and legitimate and the other as relativized and questionable; a lovers» talk in which both partners alike enjoy their own glorious soul and their precious
experience — what an underworld of faceless spectres of dialogue!
In his Confessions Augustine redirected reason inward in a fateful focus upon the content and structure of his own
mind and soul, as he now
experienced them — illumined
by grace.
A
mind or soul stretched
by a new
experience, a new idea a new friendship, never returns to its former shape.
I thereafter even came to the conclusion that this
experience was showing me exactly how man was inspired
by god to write the bible, it must have been showing me just how the holy spirit influenced the
mind and thoughts of the men who wrote the bible.
I would accept this stress on the importance of the categories of understanding imposed
by the knower, but I would want to attribute them less to the given structures of the
mind (as in Bohr's neo-Kantian view) than to the limitations of our
experience and imagination.
It seems clear that the human
mind does not possess innate patterns
by which the materials of sense
experience must be formed.
The minimal claim of process thought is that «
by reason of the relativity of all things» each actual entity is preserved everlastingly in the divine
experience.154 «God is immortal,» Hartshorne writes, «and whatever becomes an element in the life of God is therefore imperishable... I think the idea of omniscience implies that we have such an abiding presence in the
mind of God.
There is nothing more painful than the helpless attempt at the interpretation of religious documents or monuments
by one who does not know what «awe» is or to whom these testimonies to man's search for communion with ultimate reality are just the dead records of the
experience of «sick -
minded» or backward people.
Tommy God has already forgiven you for your sin the moment you asked Jesus into your life and confessed him as Lord.From that point he paid for your sin in full past present future.It is not sin that stops us from being with the Lord so you are saved.The problem you are
experiencing is the battle for your life in the here and now satan is out to destroy you and he knows our weaknesses.If you are honest there were already issues in your life that you struggled with and never got the victory over.So where do you go from here as i found myself in the same situation i was a christian but walking according to the flesh.God does nt change his
mind he always loves us but because of our choices we distance ourselves from God.The issue is that we like sin thats our wicked hearts and to be fair we cant change our nature only Christ can do that our old nature must be crucified with Christ.The stumbling block is our pride we have to admit that we cant do it For me that was terribly difficult i was so independent thinking i could do anything but the truth was a made a real mess of things.I sense you are at a crossroads and are feeling desperate and confused.So as a brother in the Lord you need to confess your sin to God and tell him that you are weak -LCB- we all are -RCB- and that you cant do it in your strength -LCB- None of us can -RCB- but ask him to send the holy spirit to help you deal with the temptations and the sin that you struggle with and he will help you to change your life he will empower you as he did me.Rather than look at who you are look to Christ and walk in him and he will make you a new man and sin will not have dominion over you.Jesus came to set us free from bondage.Having once been a slave to sin i know what it is like to have been set free
by the power of God and that is what Christ is offering you today.All it takes is a desire to change or repent and admit we cant do it and trust him to give you the strength to walk in him regards brentnz
Taking the role of an open -
minded skeptic, Berger asks probative questions about religion without being bound
by tradition, church, scripture, or personal
experience.
As his
mind turned increasingly to philosophy, the physicist in him sought to understand the whole of reality and not only man, whilst the aesthete in him interpreted all reality
by extrapolation from human
experience, thus finding aesthetic value in all actuality.
If you abort this process of yelling at God about why this text is so difficult to understand, you will never
experience the joy that comes when God,
by His Holy Spirit, opens your
mind and eyes to the meaning of the text, and without this joy of having God teach the text to you, you will never be able to have true joy in teaching the text to others.
By failing to see the place of
mind in nature as well as nature in
mind, modern philosophy has been unable to put forth an adequate account of the relation between the two, one which would assign to each its due importance as a constitutive element in our
experience and in existence as such.
By developing the
mind, our inner qualities, we can
experience perfect wholeness and contentment.
By approaching the question of
mind and nature in this way Whitehead is able to provide us with an aesthetically rich understanding of nature, which at the same time preserves a necessary role for reason and the search for truth as an indispensable element in the determination of conscious
experience, the enhancement of our aesthetic sensibilities, and the general advancement of civilization as such.
But if, for the reasons outlined earlier in this chapter, the Easter message was already beginning to take shape in the
minds of the disciples, of Peter in particular, the
experience of seeing Jesus in his glorified state would have the effect of authenticating the Easter message and of causing the Easter faith to take possession of whoever heard it, and of those, in turn, who were convinced
by the apostolic testimony.
Just as our physical bodies have evolved to suit the particular conditions on this planet and that of no other known to us, so our
minds and spirits have been shaped
by our
experience to be at home in the particular historical period in which we live.
Some might contend that it is vain to replace a dualism of
mind and matter
by an equally baffling dualism of merely sensitive in contrast to cognitive
experiencing.
Interpretation, the key method of analytical therapies, is rejected as a counterproductive
mind - game
by which therapist and client both avoid
experiencing the «now» fully.
As if
by changing their
mind will somehow change their heart, an
experience, their life.
about our powerlessness to penetrate in this sense beyond the primitive vision shared
by the earliest human
minds; that is to say, the impossibility of our advancing a step towards the direct or indirect perception of all that is hidden behind the veil of tangible
experience!
In many ways these stories were a projection of the conflicts aroused in his own
mind by his confrontation with the world he
experienced.
Even if the Servant figure is consistently or only at times conceived as an individual (on the pattern of a Jeremiah, or perhaps the prophet himself, or a contemporary, or someone yet to appear), the very individualization is obviously shaped in the prophet's
mind, consciously or unconsciously,
by his people's corporate
experience in the days from Nebuchadnezzar to Cyrus.
Suppose that there were two men: a double -
minded man, who believes he has gained faith in a loving Providence, because he had himself
experienced having been helped, even though he had hardheartedly sent away a sufferer whom he could have helped; and another man whose life,
by devoted love, was an instrument in the hand of Providence, so that he helped many suffering ones, although the help he himself had wished continued to be denied him from year to year.
But, although some of the specific
experiences, such as pains, may be (at least virtually) determined
by the brain (at least in what we usually consider «normal,» as distinct from «altered,» states of consciousness), others, such as thoughts and decisions, are not, but are based upon the
mind's self - determination.
Panexperientialists certainly can not affirm this maxim in the sense in which it is intended
by materialists, namely, that any difference in the
mind's
experience would depend upon a difference in the brain but not vice-versa.
The twice - born,
by contrast — the «sick souls» and «morbid -
minded» — are all too aware of the existence of evil, indeed, of the «
experience of evil as something essential.»