(1)(17) We are supposed to be
experiencing significant global warming, so why is the ice growing and not melting?
Do you believe that we will
experience significant global warming during this century?
Not exact matches
Climate models forecast that
global warming will cause climate patterns worldwide to
experience significant changes.
Thus it appears that, provided further satellite cloud data confirms the cosmic ray flux low cloud seeding hypothesis, and no other factors were involved over the past 150 years (e.g., variability of other cloud layers) then there is a potential for solar activity induced changes in cloudiness and irradiance to account for a
significant part of the
global warming experienced during the 20th century, with the possible exception of the last two decades.
Interestingly, the paper «Climate Trends and
Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
Global food production since 1980» (Lobell, Schlenker, Costa - Roberts, in Sciencexpress, 5 May, Science 1204531) confirms my finding of the absence of climate change in the USA: «A notable exception to the [
global] warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
global]
warming pattern is the United States, which produces c. 40 % of
global maize and soybean and experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of significant climate trends&r
global maize and soybean and
experienced a slight cooling over the period... the country with largest overall share of crop production (United States) showed no [adverse] effect due to the lack of
significant climate trends».
For longer time periods appropriate to the assessment of trends, however,
global temperatures have
experienced significant warming for all seasons except winter, when cooling trends exist instead across large stretches of eastern North America and northern Eurasia.
I'm alternately told by «skeptics» (1) it's regional impact that's important, (2) it's
global data that's more important, (3) there is no such thing as «
global temperatures,» (4) «skeptics» are not monolithic, (5) «skeptics» don't doubt that
global temperatures are
warming (and that it is to some extent influenced by AC02), or alternately «we dismiss non-
Global data), (6) all methodologyies used to determine
global temps are unreliable, (7)
global warming has stopped, (8) we're
experiencing global cooling, (9) what matters is long term trends, (10) short - term trends are
significant, (11) what's happening in Arctic isn't important (because it's regional), (12) what's happening in the Antarctic is important (despite it being regional).
The variation in the sun's energy over the course of the 20th century just isn't
significant enough to account for the rapid
global warming we're
experiencing now.
Once this happens, the CO2 effect will tend to become a
significant factor and by the first decade of the next century we may
experience global temperatures
warmer than any in the last 1000 years.