Not exact matches
Dark matter is the dominant form of substance in the universe, which
leads physicists to devise
theories and
experiments to explore its properties and understand how it originated.
It is failure — most often, the failure of a
theory to match up with a new
experiment — that
leads to exciting breakthroughs.
To test this
theory, the research team designed an
experiment to see if increased LPA signaling
led to schizophrenia - like symptoms in animal models.
A tweak to the iconic double - slit
experiment could reveal if quantum mechanics is incomplete, and maybe
lead to a
theory of quantum gravity
«From the atomic physics perspective, the
experiment is beautifully described by existing
theory,» says Stephen Eckel, an atomic physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the
lead author of the new paper.
The team of researchers,
led by Nobel Prize - winning chemist John Polanyi, employed a combination of
experiment and
theory to discover that the position of the molecule on the catalytic surface is a key factor in determining the rate at which particular bonds break.
What
led up to your most famous and most dangerous
experiment, testing your
theory on yourself?
«Part of the excitement of the
experiments is that they're
leading the
theory.
Neuroscience
theories suggest ways to translate
experiments into smarter algorithms that could
lead to a greater understanding of general intelligence.»
Chen is the experimental and intellectual
lead of these studies, which now include national and international collaborators in both
theory and
experiment.
The close collaboration with
experiment is not only teaching us about the efficacy of common approximations in electronic structure
theory, but is also
leading to important insights into the ways we might improve such approximations and consequently our ability to predict and design new materials.»
As he speculates in «Injecting Charter School Best Practices Into Traditional Public Schools: Evidence from Field
Experiments,»» [A]
leading theory posits that reading scores are influenced by the language spoken when students are outside of the classroom... [The researchers] argue that if students speak non-standard English at home and in their communities, increasing reading scores might be especially difficult.
There is however vigorous random mixing of the molecules up and down the ideal gas column at equilibrium in a gravity field
leading to non-zero pressure and non-zero temperature gradients at equilibrium proven by reasonable
experiment and
theory of published physicists.
And so I want to emphasize that, in the present case, all three paths (physical, geometric, and computational)
lead to the same conclusion, which is entirely consistent with
experiments and observation: Gravito - thermal
theories are just plain wrong.
It is our belief that «
theory leads experiment» on climate change because all well - accepted atmospheric models predict a temperature rise.
They were wrong by being internally contradictory, differing essentially from a correct
theory and by
leading to totally wrong predictions in contradiction with
experiments.
Requiring new empirical proofs for everything that has already been proven solidly by a combination of
experiments and
theory does not
lead anywhere.