Sentences with phrase «experiments show warmer»

While theoretical and model experiments show warmer seas drive more intense storms in the future, the total number isn't expected to increase.

Not exact matches

A synthesis of six such experiments with different models shows consistent hemispheric - wide atmospheric warming, strongest in the mid-to-high-latitude lower troposphere; an intensification of the wintertime Aleutian Low and, in most cases, the Siberian High; a weakening of the Icelandic Low; and a reduction in strength and southward shift of the mid-latitude westerly winds in winter.

For the change in annual mean surface air temperature in the various cases, the model experiments show the familiar pattern documented in the SAR with a maximum warming in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and a minimum in the Southern Ocean (due to ocean heat uptake)(2)

can see no other reasonable interpretation of these statements than that the scientists believe their experiments show we're in much more trouble over global warming than previously thought

In laboratory experiments and some field observations, corals showed some ability to adapt to warmer waters, but there doesn't seem to be a similar capacity to adapt to a long - term drop in the pH of shallow layers of seawater.

Global warming experiments with a «20 km grid» (actually spectral) GCM of the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI, of Japan) shows intensification of strong TCs (consistent with the GFDL model study), and increase of the life time of individual TCs (as Emanuel suggests), but also decrease of the total number of tropical storms.

Here we analyze a series of climate model experiments along with observational data to show that the recent warming trend in Atlantic sea surface temperature and the corresponding trans - basin displacements of the main atmospheric pressure centers were key drivers of the observed Walker circulation intensification, eastern Pacific cooling, North American rainfall trends and western Pacific sea - level rise.

In climate change experiments with our LES framework, the Cu regime shows a modest positive shortwave feedback under warming, while the Sc and Sc - over-Cu regimes both show strong but state - dependent positive shortwave feedbacks, with a possible break - up of Sc layers in very warm climates.

By contrast, there is quite a lot of data now telling us that CO2 is not a climate driver: We did the experiment of adding a large slug of CO2 to the air and the temperature stopped rising in 1997, the stratosphere stopped cooling in 1995 and the oceans showed no warming down to 700m when we replaced guesswork with accurate measurement in 2003.

In the case of climatology, I suppose this should have involved an experiment / investigation showing that recent warming can ONLY or MOSTLY be attributed to human forcings (e.g.; CO2 emissions) and not to natural and / or unknown causes.

Global Warming is an area of science where experiments are very hard to perform, but nature has given us 4 repetitions to show us what we might expect.

The climate change or global warming hypothesis is just that... a hypothesis and not a theory, it can never be lifted above a hypothesis because it can't be shown in any type of true lab experiment as repeatable, not once and surely not twice.

Sure, they set up a lot of websites, but if such basic experiments would indeed show that this anthropogenic global warming thing is one big whack job, then you'd think they would have conducted such experiments and published the results to stop all us average joe's being led up the garden path by a bunch of scientists.

If you think AGW is wrong, find that experiment, show that it contradicts a core element of global warming, and work from there.

There are numerous lab experiments which have been conducted which show that CO2 warms surrounding gases when it is irradiated with IR radiation.

But crucially, consensus messaging was shown in an Australian experiment to partially neutralize the biasing influence of ideology with conservatives showing a greater increase in belief in human - caused global warming than liberals (Lewandowsky, Gignac, and Vaughan 2013).

BTW Mosher, can you show us the experiment conducted in a 20 mile column of air that «proves» CO2 warms the planet.

Giaever also disputed the significance of the measured 0.8 °C average global surface warming over the past 130 years, comparing it to a human fever and the temperature at which he had to maintain tissue for cell growth during his own biophysical experiments, also showing the following slide:

Third we have the John Dodds alternate Wobble Theory of Climate Change» at www, scribd.com or at http://earth-climate.com which shows that the Arrhenius claim that more Greenhouse Gases means more warming (ie the Greenhouse Effect) does not work every night when Mother Natures nightly experiment shows that more GHGs actually result in cooling contrary to the Arrhenius / IPCC theory.

Show me an experiment that shows that reducing CO2 back to 280 ppm would stop global warming.

For the change in annual mean surface air temperature in the various cases, the model experiments show the familiar pattern documented in the SAR with a maximum warming in the high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere and a minimum in the Southern Ocean (due to ocean heat uptake) evident in the zonal mean for the CMIP2 models (Figure 9.8) and the geographical patterns for all categories of models (Figure 9.10).