Sentences with phrase «expert evidence in another case»

Temkin recommended that the Benchbook be followed up with education of legal actors and the public, as well as the introduction of expert evidence in some cases where the issues tend to give rise to rape myths that are particularly entrenched.

Not exact matches

Your case should include clear, hard, indisputable research and evidence that a real problem exists in your marketplace that points to only one reasoning: that you (the expert) have the solution.

«There is little or no evidence of cases in which expert judgment does better than intelligently constructed formulas,» Kahneman said.

The IARC evaluates substances suspected of causing cancer in humans, and arrives at its classifications by convening a working group of international experts to review and assess the strength and quality of the evidence — in this case, more than 800 studies.

Furthermore, every case that involved NPS offences would require the suitably qualified medical expert to provide their evidence in court, which would no doubt incur a substantial financial cost in order to secure their services.»

«We've been seeing growing evidence of the association between Zika and congenital central nervous system malformations, not just microcephaly, since the first cases were picked up,» says Wim Van Bortel, senior expert on vector - borne diseases at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control in Solna, Sweden.

This time, I went full blast, and together with another entomologist, an ant expert working in the German Museum of Natural History, insect evidence helped to get the case straight.

In 2006 Larry Brand, an expert on phytoplankton and a colleague of Mash's at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami, started gathering more evidence in the case against BMAIn 2006 Larry Brand, an expert on phytoplankton and a colleague of Mash's at the Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science at the University of Miami, started gathering more evidence in the case against BMAin the case against BMAA.

Experts say similar evidence could be used whenever the source of a fast - mutating virus is at issue, and the case points to the need for an explicit set of rules governing the use of such evidence in the courts.

Our findings stress the need for frequent re-evaluation of practices and policies based on guideline recommendations, particularly in cases where such recommendations rely primarily on expert opinion or limited clinical evidence,» the authors write.

In almost every case, these scrupulous, expert, and judicious researchers are forced to conclude that the evidence is mixed or unclear.

An expert report to Congress stated that «it is clear that proof of the causal connection between exposure and injury is an almost overwhelming barrier to recovery, particularly in smaller cases (regardless of their merit) because the cost of mounting the massive probative effort and the arrays of technical and scientific evidence will be prohibitive.»

In an expository essay, our expert writers not only define the problem or case but also investigate it, evaluate evidences for and against the issue or the case, present and explain the issue or case in detail and then give conclusion in a clear and concise manneIn an expository essay, our expert writers not only define the problem or case but also investigate it, evaluate evidences for and against the issue or the case, present and explain the issue or case in detail and then give conclusion in a clear and concise mannein detail and then give conclusion in a clear and concise mannein a clear and concise manner.

A court - appointed computer forensic expert finds evidence that contradicts testimony in the Zenimax vs. Oculus court case.

In both cases, presenting people with certain pieces of information trims the gap between what the scientific evidence and experts say, and what the public believes.

While those who stand in denial of climate change have failed in the last 15 years to produce a single, peer - reviewed scientific journal article that challenges the theory and evidence of human - induced climate change, mainstream media was, until very recently, covering the story (in more than half the cases, according to the academic researchers Boykoff and Boykoff) by quoting one scientist talking about the risks and one purported expert saying that climate change was not happening — or might actually be a good thing.

In any case, the question remains: If climate change is supposed to unleash waves of horrifying natural disasters as climate experts claim, why aren't we seeing any evidence of it here?

In summary, it's another case of those stubborn facts: the empirical evidence does not lie; but computer models and «experts» do.

The evidence is piling up that «climate change,» formerly known as «global warming,» is losing evidentiary support, despite recent «preliminary findings» by a group of «experts» from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) that a Washington Post editorial suggests may prove, «warming has boosted the chances, in some cases significantly, that certain unwelcome weather or weather - related disasters will occur.»

Their lawyers work with professional investigators, doctors, nurses, and other experts to start protecting your rights and gathering evidence in your case:

The appellate court answered by stating that a party can disclose a new expert, but the trial court has discretion to bar or limit evidence in the refiled case.

This is because in Ireland the size of the market is relatively small but the costs of a full competition case, with the requirement of expert evidence and a great deal of factual information poses significant challenges.

The opportunity to submit testimonial evidence, particularly expert testimony, may be helpful in avoiding institution of review in some cases.

At The Kevin P Landry Law Offices, we'll work tirelessly to build the strongest case possible, by collaborating with seasoned experts and conducting in - depth investigations to fully understand the evidence.

In the Recent BC case of D.M.L. v. D.B.L the court reviewed the statutory and case law as well as hearing expert evidence form Dr Elterman, a well known psychologist who prepares parenting and child assessments and from both the parties themselves.

How an Experienced Birth Injury Lawyer Can Help For a successful case, it is often necessary to hire experts, take depositions and gather evidence in an effort to oppose the lawyers of large insurance firms.

Our commitment to gaining & maintaining extreme knowledge: a. Of Texas substantive product liability law; b. Of Texas & federal expert exclusionary law; c. Of how to destroy adverse experts during deposition & trial cross examination, and through the use of testing, demonstrations, statistical, and other technical evidence presented by a team of highest quality experts; d. Of the overlapping technical issues arising in product liability cases relating to the specific types of technologically advanced products that we defend, which overlapping of issues facilitates our development and maintenance of our extreme knowledge.

In some cases, the attorney will hire an expert in accident reconstruction who will examine all evidence of the collision or defective product in order to render an opinion on what caused the problem in the first placIn some cases, the attorney will hire an expert in accident reconstruction who will examine all evidence of the collision or defective product in order to render an opinion on what caused the problem in the first placin accident reconstruction who will examine all evidence of the collision or defective product in order to render an opinion on what caused the problem in the first placin order to render an opinion on what caused the problem in the first placin the first place.

A Chicago personal injury attorney who has experience in product liability cases will be able to evaluate your situation and determine what kind of evidence and testimony you'll need, and find the necessary experts to support your claim.

An expert Toronto fraud lawyer, I can often spot «holes in the case» or find opportunities to exclude or challenge specific evidence.

Attorneys put up large sums of money on these complex cases in order to hire experts, and investigators, take depositions, gather evidence and oppose the lawyers of large corporations and their insurance firms.

It is for the courts, on a case by case basis, to make a judgment of the individual's qualities and to weigh the expert's evidence in accordance with this judgment.

We work closely with medical experts, highly trained doctors and nursing specialists to build a strong case and have the resources to collect good evidence in support of your claim.

But in this case the SQL queries were just summing or tabulating simple data; Any judge can understand that and it's questionable whether any expert evidence could be admitted (for that purpose).

In the July 2011 issue of Canadian Lawyer, we wrote about «hot tubbing» — the term was coined in Australia to describe the procedure of organizing all experts in a case into a panel and hearing their evidence concurrentlIn the July 2011 issue of Canadian Lawyer, we wrote about «hot tubbing» — the term was coined in Australia to describe the procedure of organizing all experts in a case into a panel and hearing their evidence concurrentlin Australia to describe the procedure of organizing all experts in a case into a panel and hearing their evidence concurrentlin a case into a panel and hearing their evidence concurrently.

Where adjournments are required for further expert or medical evidence to arrive or be obtained, then it should be for the judge to determine what is right, just and equitable in relation to the facts and circumstances of the particular case before them.

(paragraph 9 point 1) The court also noted that there were «no generally acknowledged practices for preserving, documenting or securing electronic evidence», but on review, even the defendant's expert described the plaintiff's practice in this case as «picture perfect.»

It is common experience that it is advantageous to read all the available papers so as to gain an overview of the entire case rather than limit that task to the relatively small area that is truly relevant to the expert's own field for the expert evidence in a particular case must be given in relation to the whole case if the opinion is to be of real value to the court when it comes to decide on the issues before it.

An Ontario trial judge (recently) used expert evidence based on a Bayesian analysis to get the plaintiff's case over the balance of probability threshold in Goodman v. Viljoen, 2011 ONSC 821.

I was surprised to open the Federal Rules of Evidence volume and click on Rule 702, governing testimony by experts, and find only one case, the 8th Circuit opinion in Fox v. Dannenberg, but no reference to the seminal case, Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.

In this particular case, «many of the expert reports offer theories or rely on evidence never previously disclosed as required», and that's the basis on which a number of motions to strike succeeded.

In a medical malpractice case, one of the most valuable types of evidence is that of opinions of experts.

Medical experts reported that breathing in mercury gases could potentially trigger kidney and brain dysfunction, but the defendants in the case argued that there was no evidence that showed how mercury could cause such obscure conditions.

When this is the case, a seasoned Long Island injury attorney can step into the fray, assess the facts, amass crucial evidence and enlist the aid of skilled experts in order build the strongest possible case for an award of financial compensation.

These standards will prevent Wisconsin state courts from being bogged down with cases based on «junk science,» and will discourage cases of questionable merit from being brought in Wisconsin because of weaker expert opinion evidence standards.

Belatedly, after closing their case, the carriers produced an addendum submission from their expert Mr. Crosson, in response to the applicants» concerns that the carriers had failed to produce evidence on the cost of a 1P1F policy.

Establishing legal fault in a product liability case can be quite complex, and often times may require evidence such as an expert testimony.

«Injury cases, and some illness cases, will depend upon expert evidence from specialists in standards in the holiday jurisdiction.

Further, it is almost always the case that independent expert evidence (sometimes in a number of disciplines) is needed.

An expert witness gives hearsay evidence (that is to say, he gives an opinion, not an eye - witness's evidence): necessarily so, because he was not present at the scene of the crime (or, in a civil case, he did not see the events at issue occur).