Sentences with phrase «expert judgment about»

Our estimates of key climate model uncertainties are constrained by observations of the climate system for the period 1906 - 1995, 7 and uncertainty in emissions reflect errors in measurement of current emissions and expert judgment about variables that influence key economic projections.

Given that there is no technically correct set of standards and given that expert judgment about the quality of standards has never been validated by better student outcomes, there is no reason for Arkansas to defer to the small group of national experts who drafted the Common Core standards.

Not exact matches

It is surrounded by larger and deeper value questions that it can not resolve by itself3 The technical expert may make judgments about these more comprehensive issues of good and bad.

And just as Emily, the woman mentioned in the blog post, experienced, rather than getting good guidance from the experts, parents end up insecure about their own capabilities, simply forgetting about the importance of their own judgment or even feeling guilty for having ideas and feelings that don't seem to match their noble motives.

Oppenheimer and his co-authors use a technique known as «structured expert judgment» to put an actual value on the uncertainty that scientists studying climate change have about a particular model's prediction of future events such as sea - level rise.

States will also benefit from supporting Peer Assistance and Review models that identify teachers who are struggling, provide them with intensive, expert assistance from mentor teachers in their content areas, and make a timely judgment about continued employment that is grounded in useful evidence, intensive support, and due process.

Currently, many teachers view observation as the same thing as evaluation when in fact these structures (informal, formal and walkthrough observations) provide a means for gathering what Charlotte Danielson, Dr. Robert Marzano and others experts refer to as a preponderance of evidence in order to make a reasoned judgment about a teacher's overall practice.

Authorized by NAEP legislation and adopted by the National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB), the three achievement levels are determined by cut points based on the collective judgments of experts about what students should know and be able to do.

It may also be asked to support decisions about compensation, as policymakers are increasingly interested in tying compensation to judgments about teacher effectiveness, either by differentiating wages or by linking such judgments to specific responsibilities and salary increments for more expert teachers.

I remember reading this quote in which you refer to Taylor: «I do not believe that «the experts» in any field should be dictating climate policy because there are plenty of important value judgments built in to those policies and experts however defined have no objectively better values than you or I.» I thought about that statement all day.

But if you firmly hold that you have a significant conclusion on this somewhat esoteric topic, the place to have that conclusion tested is in the published scientific literature - that's what peer review is all about, to provide a mechanism for an adjudicated evaluation and judgment of your argument by experts.

In the real world, if someone purports to be an expert, they tell you that they have special knowledge of a subject, that you should rely on their judgment that certain claims are true, and they turn out to have no clue whatsoever about said claims, that person is no longer considered reliable or trustworthy.

It's a rather low - quality scan but worth thinking about in the light of IPCC's use of expert judgment to estimate confidence.

The recent cold, snowy winters are black swans if you listened to the «experts,» like the featherheads at UKMET with their bogus warm - biased models, but if you've the brains and judgment to find the few guys who really know what they're talking about, Bastardi.

In a 44 - page judgment, Justice Sean Dunphy dismissed the libel suit, writing that lawyer Maia Bent's concerns about Dr. Howard Platnick have merit and that there is a «public interest» in not stifling debate about reports from medical experts.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.

But here's the kicker: the plaintiff isn't going to know if they can even get that information about an epidemic, or if the expert report is good enough, until after they've filed the suit and have litigated it to summary judgment, scaring off many lawyers from filing these cases in the first place unless the outbreak has already been disclosed publicly.

The judgment accepts the evidence of experts and others who testified about the ways in which solitary confinement triggers and exacerbates mental health conditions, and increases risks of self - harm and suicide.

Attorneys need to read the guidelines, consult technology experts and form their own judgments about whether cloud - based trust software for attorneys is the best choice for their practice and their clients.

An expert needs to keep at the forefront of their mind that they need to continually ensure that their own bias about how something should be done does not cloud their judgment of what a reasonable surgeon might do.

Parenting experts stressed no one can make a judgment about someone's parenting based on cautiously choreographed scenarios like a televised campaign.