Not exact matches
Dooley, a scientist with the Atmospheric Science and Global Change Division and the Joint Global Change Research Institute, is an international
expert on the role of
carbon capture and
storage in addressing climate change.
Again, I'm not an
expert on this, and I'm not familiar with the ways being considered for
carbon storage.
Karen Street wrote: «If we're going to address climate change, it's going to start with solutions
experts agree
on (efficiency, low - GHG sources such as nuclear,
carbon capture and
storage, wind, geothermal, cellulosic biofuels, and eventually solar)...»
If we're going to address climate change, it's going to start with solutions
experts agree
on (efficiency, low - GHG sources such as nuclear,
carbon capture and
storage, wind, geothermal, cellulosic biofuels, and eventually solar), and processes that
experts agree
on (increasing the cost of GHG emissions, funding more R&D, mandates sometimes).
«He's seriously confused,» said Oliver Phillips, a professor of geography at the University of Leeds in Britain and an
expert on terrestrial
carbon storage.
A lot of climate and energy
experts I've interviewed of late see no prospect of that doing the job without also making an aggressive push for basic research
on the frontiers of solar, energy
storage,
carbon dioxide capture, and more.